Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 523

Tests administered to newborns for congenital disorders. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 4, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 27, 2014

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 11, 2014

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 13, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 135

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 4, 2014: “Published 3-4-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, blood tests for congenital and metabolic disorders (infant blood tests), as specified in rules promulgated by the Department of Health Services (DHS), must be performed on every infant born in a hospital or maternity home prior to the infant's discharge. If an infant is born elsewhere than in a hospital or maternity home, these infant blood tests must be performed within one week of birth.

Also under current law, DHS may establish a urine testing program to test infants for causes of congenital disorders (infant urine testing program), in which no person is required to participate. DHS must, under current law, contract with the State Laboratory of Hygiene (SLH) to perform any required infant tests and to furnish materials for use in those tests and must, by rule, impose a fee for infant testing to cover various specified costs. Current law imposes confidentiality requirements on information obtained from parents or a legal guardian in connection with infant testing or obtained from infant testing specimens.

Read the full summary

This bill eliminates the provision related to establishing an infant urine testing program and modifies the provision relating to infant blood tests so that the required tests, as specified in rules promulgated by DHS, may be any kind of test. Information obtained from these required infant tests are subject to the same confidentiality requirements as under current law. The bill provides that DHS must contract with the SLH to perform any required infant tests that are laboratory tests and to furnish materials for use in the tests. The bill also provides that DHS may require reporting in connection with any required infant tests for use in statistical data compilation and for evaluation of infant screening programs. The bill does not affect provisions in current law relating to newborn hearing screenings.

Also under current law, the infant blood test and infant urine testing program provisions do not apply if the parents or legal guardian of the child object on the grounds that the test conflicts with their religious tenets and practices. The bill retains this provision with respect to any required infant tests and provides that, in addition, the parents or legal guardian of the child may object on the grounds that a required infant test conflicts with their personal convictions.

Who's behind it

11 senators are its ⁠. 6 are Republicans and 5 are Democrats.

27 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 38 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (27)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 5, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 4, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 4, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 135.

  3. Feb 28, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 14, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Feb 13, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  6. Feb 13, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  7. Feb 11, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Feb 11, 2014

    The Assembly received it.

  9. Feb 11, 2014

    The Senate passed it.

  10. Feb 5, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Feb 3, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Jan 30, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Jan 29, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jan 27, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  15. Jan 27, 2014

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 27, 2014 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Vukmir, Petrowski, L. Taylor, Carpenter, Cowles, Darling, Hansen, Lassa, Lehman, Leibham and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Strachota, Kleefisch, Ballweg, Berceau, Bies, Billings, Brooks, Clark, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Kahl, Krug, Mason, Murphy, Mursau, Nass, A. Ott, Ripp, Rodriguez, Sanfelippo, Spiros, Tittl and Wright

  2. Jan 27, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services

  3. Jan 29, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 30, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 3, 2014 · Senate

    Representative Loudenbeck added as a cosponsor

  6. Feb 4, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 5, 2014 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 5, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 6, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  13. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  16. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  17. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules

  18. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Born added as a cosponsor

  19. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  20. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor

  27. Feb 24, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. Feb 28, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 2-28-2014

  29. Mar 4, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-3-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 135

  30. Mar 4, 2014 · Senate

    Published 3-4-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote