Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

SB 547

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: adaptive management plans for reducing discharges of phosphorus and total suspended solids to the waters of the state and a statewide variance to the water quality standard for phosphorus for certain dischargers. (FE)

Administration, department of — Agency and general functions Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Water — Pollution Waterways and water power

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill provides for a variance to limits on the amount of phosphorus allowed

in discharges to water bodies that contain excessive amounts of phosphorus, if

conditions specified in the bill are met. The bill also authorizes the use of adaptive

management, explained below, to comply with water quality standards for

phosphorus and total suspended solids.

Water quality standards and effluent limitations

The federal Clean Water Act allows the federal Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) to delegate responsibilities under the act, including issuing

wastewater discharge permits for point sources (factories and sewage treatment

plants, for example), to a state if the state's laws comply with requirements in the

act. EPA has delegated these responsibilities to this state.

Consistent with the Clean Water Act, current state law requires the

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to promulgate rules setting water quality

standards for the waters of the state. The standards include criteria for specific

pollutants. A criterion may be narrative (describing the characteristics that the

water should have) or numeric (specifying the maximum concentration of a

pollutant).

Under current federal and state law, wastewater discharge permits include

restrictions, called effluent limitations, on the amount of various pollutants that may

be discharged. One type of effluent limitation is applicable without regard to the

quality of the receiving water body and is based on the level of control achieved using

treatment technology that is reasonably available (considering cost, among other

things) for limiting the discharge of a pollutant. If this kind of limitation (called a

technology based effluent limitation) is not sufficient to ensure that a water quality

standard for a pollutant will be met in a particular water body, permits for sources

that discharge into the water body must generally contain effluent limitations for the

pollutant that are more stringent than the technology based effluent limitation and

that are designed to ensure that the water quality standard will be met. This kind

of limitation is called a water quality based effluent limitation.

Current law allows DNR to grant a permittee a variance to a water quality

based effluent limitation if the permittee demonstrates that complying with the

effluent limitation is not feasible for one of several reasons, including that applying

the effluent limitation to the source would cause substantial and widespread adverse

social and economic impacts in the area where the source is located. The term of a

variance may not exceed five years. A variance may be renewed, but only for as long

as it remains infeasible for the source to comply with the water quality based effluent

limitation. Variances are subject to review and approval by EPA.

Phosphorus water quality rules

In 2010, DNR promulgated rules adding a numerical water quality criterion to

the water quality standard for phosphorus. Some water bodies in Wisconsin do not

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cowles (R) , Darling (R) , Farrow (R) , Grothman (R) , Petrowski (R)

14 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Czaja (R) , Kaufert (R) , Klenke (R) , Krug (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Marklein (R) , Spiros (R) , Steineke (R) , Tauchen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Weininger (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 4, Noes 3

Passed 4–3 Feb 13, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 4, Noes 3

Passed 4–3 Feb 13, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 76, Noes 19

Passed 76–19 Feb 20, 2014 official source full page

Aye · 76

Not voting · 4

Full history

  1. Feb 3, 2014 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Cowles, Farrow, Petrowski, Grothman and Darling; cosponsored by Representatives Loudenbeck, Krug, Steineke, Spiros, Bies, Marklein, Czaja, Ballweg, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, LeMahieu, Weininger, Kaufert and Klenke

  2. Feb 3, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications

  3. Feb 4, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 6, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 12, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Farrow

  6. Feb 13, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 13, 2014 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  8. Feb 13, 2014 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  9. Feb 13, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  13. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2014 by Committee on Rules

  20. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 76, Noes 19

  24. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Feb 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  27. Apr 22, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014

  28. Apr 24, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 378

  29. Apr 24, 2014 · Senate

    Published 4-24-2014