Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 560

Regulation of hospitals, granting rule-making authority, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 9, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 5, 2014

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 18, 2014

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 18, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 236

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 9, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Rules and standards that apply to hospitals Under current state law, the Department of Health Services (DHS) must promulgate, adopt, amend, and enforce rules and standards for the construction, maintenance, and operation of hospitals that are deemed necessary to provide safe and adequate care and treatment of the patients in hospitals and to protect the health and safety of hospital patients and employees. On receipt of an application, DHS must issue a certificate of approval to maintain a hospital if the applicant and hospital facilities meet the requirements established by DHS.

Under current federal law, a hospital participating in the federal Medicare program must satisfy certain requirements, including requirements set out in federal regulations promulgated by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the United States Department of Health and Human Services (CMS).

Read the full summary

These federal regulations are known as the federal conditions for Medicare participation for hospitals (COP). Certain hospitals designated as "critical access hospitals" pursuant to federal law operate under a different COP.

This bill generally provides that, effective July 1, 2016:

1. DHS must use and enforce the COPs as the minimum standards that apply to hospitals. DHS must interpret the COPs using guidelines adopted by CMS, unless DHS determines that a different interpretation is reasonably necessary to protect public health and safety.

2. DHS may not, except as described below, enforce certain administrative rules pertaining to hospitals that were promulgated by DHS that are currently in effect, including rules pertaining to management of hospitals, hospital medical staff, and required services in hospitals.

3. DHS must, within the scope of its rulemaking authority, promulgate rules to repeal and recreate its current rules pertaining to hospitals. Upon promulgation of a rule to repeal and recreate its current rules pertaining to hospitals, the prohibition against enforcement of DHS's rules no longer applies.

The bill also eliminates a restriction in current law providing that nothing in DHS's rules or standards for hospitals may pertain to a person licensed to practice medicine and surgery or dentistry.

Other changes to laws regulating hospitals The bill makes other changes to the laws regulating hospitals. Significant changes to current law in the bill include the following:

1. Current law provides that the building codes and construction standards of the Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) apply to all hospitals.

Current law also allows DHS to promulgate and adopt rules and standards for the construction of hospitals, but provides that DHS may adopt additional construction codes and standards for hospitals only if they are not lower than the requirements of DSPS.

The bill retains the provision providing that the building codes and construction standards of DSPS apply to all hospitals, but provides that they apply only to the extent that they are not incompatible with any building codes or construction standards required by the COPs. The bill retains the authority for DHS to promulgate and adopt rules and standards for the construction of hospitals, but eliminates the specific restriction on that authority described above.

2. Under current law, DHS must conduct plan reviews of all capital construction and remodeling projects of hospitals to ensure that the plans comply with building code requirements in the laws administered by DSPS and with physical plant requirements for hospitals. Also under current law, DHS must promulgate rules that establish a fee schedule for its services in conducting the plan reviews described above. The schedule may not, however, set the fees at levels that are higher than certain specified amounts.

This bill retains the requirement that DHS conduct plan reviews of all capital construction and remodeling projects of hospitals and retains the authority of DHS to promulgate rules establishing a fee schedule for the plan reviews, but eliminates the restrictions on amounts in the fee schedule.

3. Current DHS rules require the governing body of a hospital to establish a policy that requires every patient to be under the care of a licensed physician, dentist, or podiatrist. The policy must, under those rules, provide that a person may be admitted to a hospital only on the recommendation of a physician, dentist, or podiatrist, with a physician designated to be responsible for the medical aspects of care.

Also, under current law, a hospital that admits patients for treatment of mental illness may grant to a psychologist who is listed or eligible to be listed in the National Register of Health Services Providers in Psychology or who is certified by the American Board of Professional Psychology an opportunity to obtain hospital staff privileges to admit, treat, and discharge patients. If a hospital grants a psychologist hospital staff privileges, the psychologist or the hospital must, prior to or at the time of hospital admission of a patient, identify an appropriate physician with admitting privileges at the hospital who shall be responsible for the medical evaluation and medical management of the patient for the duration of his or her hospitalization.

The bill provides that a hospital may afford any practitioner the opportunity to be a member of the hospital staff and obtain hospital staff privileges if the membership or privileges are not otherwise prohibited and the membership or privileges are consistent with the practitioner's scope of practice.

The bill repeals the provisions in current law that specifically address the granting of hospital staff privileges to psychologists.

4. Under current law, the secretary of health services or his or her designee (secretary) may grant a variance to a statute affecting hospitals or a rule of DHS affecting hospitals if all of the following apply: 1) the secretary determines that a disaster, as defined under the emergency management law, has occurred; 2) a hospital has requested the variance; and 3) the secretary determines that the variance is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. Such a variance must be for a stated term not to exceed 90 days, except that the secretary may extend the variance upon request by the hospital if the secretary determines that an extension is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare.

This bill makes the following changes with respect to variances affecting hospitals: 1) eliminates the requirement that, in order to grant a variance, the secretary determine that a disaster has occurred; 2) eliminates the requirement that a variance be for a limited term unless extended; 3) also allows a variance to be granted for the purpose of supporting the efficient and economic operation of a hospital; 4) expands the scope of the secretary's authority to any other requirement for hospitals, such as the COP; and 5) allows the secretary to grant a waiver, in addition to granting a variance, from the requirements for hospitals.

5. The bill provides that a hospital accredited by an approved national accrediting organization is exempt from routine inspections and investigations to determine compliance with, and is considered to be in compliance with, the requirements for hospitals. The bill provides, however, that this exemption does not extend to plan reviews conducted by DHS of capital construction and remodeling projects of hospitals, and provides that DHS may inspect an accredited hospital to investigate a complaint or comply with a request by CMS, including a request to validate the findings of the accrediting organization.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

16 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (16)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 14, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 17, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 17, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Feb 18, 2014 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 9, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 9, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 236.

  3. Apr 7, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 18, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Feb 18, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  6. Feb 18, 2014

    “Read” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 18, 2014

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Feb 18, 2014

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.

  9. Feb 18, 2014

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Feb 17, 2014

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 17, 2014

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  12. Feb 14, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  13. Feb 12, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Feb 12, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Feb 7, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Feb 5, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  17. Feb 5, 2014

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 5, 2014 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Vukmir, Grothman and Schultz; cosponsored by Representatives Marklein, LeMahieu, Ballweg, Bewley, Brooks, Jacque, Kapenga, Knodl, Knudson, T. Larson, Nygren, Ringhand, Severson, Doyle and Strachota

  2. Feb 5, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services

  3. Feb 7, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 12, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 12, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 13, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Vukmir

  10. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  18. Feb 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read

  21. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  22. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Wright added as a cosponsor

  27. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Feb 19, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  29. Feb 24, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Apr 7, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014

  31. Apr 9, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 236

  32. Apr 9, 2014 · Senate

    Published 4-9-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote