Senate Bill 582
Own risk and solvency assessments, supervisory colleges, consolidated hearings for mergers of insurance companies, proxy voting by mutual policyholders, a presumption and exceptions with respect to the disclosure of insurance-related information, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 17, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 7, 2014
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 18, 2014
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 18, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 279
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes various miscellaneous changes to the insurance laws, including the following:
1. The bill requires every insurer, or insurance holding company system of which the insurer is a member, to: a) maintain a risk management framework to assist the insurer or insurance holding company system in identifying and managing its material and relevant risks; and b) whenever there are significant changes to the insurer's or insurance holding company system's risk profile, but at least annually, conduct an "own risk and solvency assessment" (ORSA) consistent with the ORSA Guidance Manual (guidance manual) developed and adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The bill defines an insurance holding company system as two or more persons that are affiliates, at least one of which is an insurer, and an ORSA as a confidential internal assessment of the insurer's or insurance holding company system's material and relevant risks associated with the insurer's or insurance holding company system's current business plan and of the sufficiency of the capital resources to support those risks. Under the bill, the insurer must file with the commissioner of insurance (commissioner) a report that is prepared consistently with the guidance manual summarizing the insurer's ORSA (summary report). In general, the report must be filed with the commissioner within 45 days after the insurer submits the summary report to its board of directors but no more than once per year or within 45 days after the insurer submits the summary report to the commissioner of the insurer's lead state.
Read the full summary Show less
An insurer is exempt from the requirements of maintaining a risk management framework, conducting an ORSA, and filing a summary report if the insurer's annual direct written premium and assumed premium from unaffiliated insurers is less than $500,000,000 and, if the insurer is a member of an insurance holding company system, the insurance holding company system of which the insurer is a member has annual direct written premium and assumed premium from unaffiliated insurers of less than $1,000,000,000. If the insurer's premium qualifies the insurer for exemption but the premium of the insurance holding company system of which the insurer is a member does not qualify the insurance holding company system for exemption, the summary report must include every insurer in the insurance holding company system. If the insurer does not qualify for exemption but the insurance holding company system of which it is a member qualifies for exemption, only the summary report applicable to the insurer is required.
The bill sets out detailed confidentiality requirements with respect to documents, materials, and other information, including summary reports, that are obtained or created by, or disclosed to, the commissioner as a result of the new risk assessment requirements. Generally, the documents, materials, and other information, including summary reports, are confidential and privileged and are not subject to inspection, copying, subpoena, or discovery and are not admissible in evidence in any private civil action. The bill sets out the circumstances under which and to whom the documents, materials, and other information, including summary reports, may be disclosed, as well as procedures that must be used for the disclosure.
2. Under current law, the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) may refuse to disclose testimony, reports, records, and information obtained, produced, or created in the course of examinations, investigations, and other inquiries with respect to persons regulated under the insurance statutes. The statutes specify how this privilege of nondisclosure may be waived. The bill creates a rebuttable presumption that documents and information provided to OCI by an insurer in response to an OCI request or in the course of an examination of the affairs or condition of the insurer are proprietary and confidential and that the potential for harm and competitive disadvantage to the insurer outweighs the public interest in the disclosure of the documents and information. The presumption may be rebutted by presenting clear and convincing evidence to a court that the public interest in the disclosure substantially outweighs the potential for harm or competitive disadvantage to the insurer. The bill also excludes from the statute related to nondisclosure of insurance information certain types of information or reports, including ORSA reports and information, enterprise risk filing and related information, and reports of internal control over financial reporting and related information, and provides that the information or reports are subject to confidentiality provisions that are specific to that information or those reports.
3. The bill authorizes the commissioner to participate in a supervisory college for any domestic insurer that is part of an insurance holding company system with international operations. A supervisory college is defined in the bill as a forum for communication and cooperation between regulators charged with the supervision of an insurer that is part of an insurance holding company system with international operations. The purpose for the commissioner's participation is to assess the business strategy, financial position, legal and regulatory position, risk exposure, risk management, and governance processes of the domestic insurer. The commissioner's participation may include initiating the establishment of a supervisory college, coordinating the ongoing activities of the supervisory college, establishing a crisis management plan, and entering into agreements for keeping information confidential. The commissioner may impose a regular assessment on affected insurers to pay the reasonable expenses of the commissioner's participation.
4. Under current law, the proxy voting provisions that apply to members of general nonstock corporations apply to policyholders of mutual insurance corporations (mutuals). The bill removes that applicability and sets out proxy voting rights that are specific to the policyholders of mutuals. Under the bill, a policyholder or the policyholder's authorized officer, director, employee, agent, or attorney-in-fact may appoint a proxy to vote or otherwise act for the policyholder at a meeting of policyholders or to consent or dissent in writing to any corporate action without a meeting. The appointment may be accomplished by affixing the policyholder's signature to an appointment form by any reasonable means or by transmitting an electric transmission, including by Internet, telephone, electronic mail, telegram, cablegram, or datagram, of the appointment to the person who will be appointed as proxy. An appointment of a proxy is effective when a signed appointment form or electronic transmission of the appointment is received by the officer or agent of the mutual authorized to tabulate votes and lasts 11 months unless a different period is expressly provided in the appointment. Unless the appointment form or electronic transmission states otherwise, appointment of a proxy may be revoked, which occurs if the policyholder appointing the proxy: a) attends a meeting and votes; or b) signs and delivers to the officer or agent of the mutual authorized to tabulate votes either a written statement that the proxy appointment is revoked or a subsequent proxy appointment form. The death or incapacity of the policyholder appointing the proxy does not affect the right of the mutual to accept the proxy's authority unless the officer or agent of the mutual authorized to tabulate votes receives notice of the death or incapacity before the proxy exercises his or her authority under the appointment.
5. Under current law, a plan of merger or for acquisition of control of a domestic stock insurance corporation, or a plan of merger between two or more mutuals, may not be executed unless it is approved by the commissioner after a hearing. Such plans are approved unless the commissioner finds that they would violate the law or be contrary to the interests of the insureds of a participating insurance corporation or mutual. The bill provides that, if a plan requires the approval of more than one commissioner because the insurance corporations involved are domiciled in different states, the hearing for approval may be held on a consolidated basis, if so requested by the person filing the plan, although the commissioner may opt out of a consolidated hearing. Any consolidated hearing must be public and held within the United States before the commissioners of the states in which the insurers involved in the merger or other acquisition of control are domiciled. The commissioners may hear and receive evidence and may attend the consolidated hearing in person or by telecommunication.
6. The bill requires the commissioner to promulgate rules requiring insurers to report their enterprise risk, including the form of the report and the manner and process for filing. Enterprise risk is defined in the bill as any activity, circumstance, or event involving one or more affiliates of the insurer that, if not remedied, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or liquidity of the insurer or its insurance holding company system.
Who's behind it
Frank G. Lasee, a Republican, is its .
2 more lawmakers .
See all 3 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (2)
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Wright, Smith, Vruwink and Barca
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 14, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 17, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 17, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 279.
-
Apr 16, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 18, 2014
4 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Feb 18, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 18, 2014
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Feb 18, 2014
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 18, 2014
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 17, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 14, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 12, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 7, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.
-
Feb 7, 2014
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 7, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Lasee; cosponsored by Representative Petersen
- Feb 7, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance and Housing
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Representatives Wright, Smith, Vruwink and Barca added as cosponsors
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 19, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 24, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 16, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014
- Apr 17, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 279
- Apr 17, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-17-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote