Senate Bill 584
Requirements for new private schools seeking to participate in a parental choice program and requiring a private school participating in a parental choice program to maintain accreditation. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 9, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 10, 2014
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 33 to 0
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 20, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 237
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 9, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes several changes to the Milwaukee, Racine, and state-wide parental choice programs (PCPs), under which an eligible pupil may attend a participating private school with financial assistance from the state. Among these changes are the following:
Additional requirements for "new private schools" Under current law, a private school may participate in one or more PCPs if it satisfies certain criteria and fulfills specified requirements by specified deadlines.
Read the full summary Show less
For example, the private school must notify the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) by February 1 of its intent to participate in a PCP in the upcoming school year.
Under current law, school year is defined to mean the time commencing with July 1 and ending with the next succeeding June 30. Current law also requires a private school to be accredited by one in a list of approved accrediting organizations. If, prior to its first year of participation in a PCP, the private school is not accredited, the private school must, with limited exceptions, obtain preaccreditation by August 1 of its first school term of participation in a PCP. Current law defines school term to mean the time commencing with the first school day and ending with the last school day that the schools of a school district are in operation for attendance of pupils in a school year, other than for the operation of summer classes. Private schools seeking to participate in — or continue to participate in — a PCP must also provide a minimum number of hours of direct pupil instruction to pupils attending the school and meet all health and safety codes applicable to public schools. A private school that has participated in a PCP in any school year must also submit to DPI by September 1 of the following school year an independent financial audit of the private school and evidence of sound fiscal practices.
This bill imposes additional requirements upon a "new private school"seeking to participate in a PCP and defines a "new private school" as a private school that, with certain exceptions, satisfies either of the following: 1) the private school has been in continuous operation in the state for less than 12 consecutive months, or 2) the private school provides education to fewer than 40 pupils divided into two or fewer grades. A private school that is operated by a governing body that also operates or manages a participating private school is not considered to be a new private school if that governing body has not been barred from participating in a PCP or had any payment withheld by DPI in the three immediately preceding school years. The bill defines "governing body of a private school" and "governing body of a new private school" as a board elected or appointed to govern the private school or, if no board is appointed or elected to govern the school, any other person having direct charge of the private school.
Under the bill, a new private school must comply with the following additional requirements prior to being able to participate in a PCP:
1. By August 1 of the school year preceding the school year in which the private school first intends to participate, the private school must: notify DPI of its intent to participate and pay a nonrefundable fee; submit a complete budget for the first fiscal period of participation in a PCP that shows, among other things, that the private school will have a positive cash flow in each month of the fiscal period and no operating deficit; and provide certain information about the governing body of and policies that will govern the private school.
2. By December 15 of the school year immediately preceding the school year in which the private school first intends to participate, the private school must obtain preaccreditation from an approved preaccrediting entity.
3. By August 1 of the first school year in which the private school intends to participate, the private school must demonstrate to the satisfaction of DPI that the private school has contracted with a third-party payroll service.
The bill requires DPI to notify a new private school whether it has fulfilled specified requirements by December 31 of the school year immediately preceding the school year in which the private school first intends to participate. A new private school that does not fulfill the requirements may not participate in a PCP in the following school year, but may reinitiate the process for participating for the next following school year.
The additional requirements for new private schools first apply to a new private school seeking to participate in a PCP in the 2015-16 school year.
Preaccreditation and accreditation requirements 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 (Act 20, the biennial budget bill) requires a private school participating in a PCP to continuously maintain accreditation with one of a list of approved accrediting organizations for as long as the private school continues to participate in the PCP. Act 20 also requires participating private schools to annually, by January 15, submit evidence to DPI demonstrating that the private school remains accredited for the current school year. Finally, Act 20 requires DPI to bar from the PCP a private school that fails to provide evidence of accreditation, at the end of the school year and until the private school satisfies the accreditation requirement.
This bill creates formal definitions for "accrediting entity" and "preaccrediting entity"; these defined terms replace duplicated lists of approved preaccrediting and accrediting organizations to simplify the statutes. The bill clarifies that each private school that begins participation in a PCP after the effective date of the bill and that is not already accredited by an accrediting entity must obtain preaccreditation from a preaccrediting entity by August 1 before the first school term of participation in the PCP. The bill specifies that each private school that participates in a PCP and that is not already accredited by an accrediting entity must apply for accreditation by December 31 of the first school year in which the private school participates in the PCP, and must obtain accreditation by December 31 of its fourth school year of participation in the PCP. The bill also requires a private school that is accredited to offer instruction in certain specified grades, such as kindergarten through 8th grade or the high school grades, but intends to offer instruction in additional grades to obtain and continuously maintain accreditation for those additional grades in the same manner as it was required to obtain and maintain accreditation in the original grades. Finally, the bill provides that, if a participating private school learns that the organization with which it is accredited is a "disqualified organization," the private school must obtain accreditation from an accrediting entity no later than three years from the date the private school learned the accrediting organization is a disqualified organization. The bill defines "disqualified organization" as an accrediting organization that is not an accrediting entity or a member of or otherwise sanctioned by an accrediting entity.
Who's behind it
2 senators are its . All 2 are Republicans.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 5 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Leah Vukmir · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (3)
- Rob Hutton · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Jessie Rodriguez · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Education vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 20, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 7, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 7, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 33 to 0 · Mar 11, 2014
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (33)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- John Lehman (D, 21)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Nikiya Harris Dodd (D, 6)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Richard Gudex (R, 18)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 9, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 9, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 237.
-
Apr 7, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 20, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 18, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 12, 2014
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 11, 2014
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 11, 2014
The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.
-
Mar 7, 2014
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 7, 2014
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 7, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 20, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Feb 13, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 12, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 10, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.
-
Feb 10, 2014
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 10, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vukmir and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Rodriguez and Hutton
- Feb 10, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 13, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Vinehout
- Feb 20, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 20, 2014 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 7, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 7, 2014 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 7, 2014 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 7, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Senator L. Taylor added as a coauthor
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 26, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 7, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014
- Apr 9, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 237
- Apr 9, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-9-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote