Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

SB 626

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: preemption of city, village, town, or county living wage ordinances with respect to employees who perform work that is funded, in whole or in part, with state funds and preemption of residency requirements for laborers, workers, mechanics, and truck drivers employed on local projects of public works to which the prevailing wage law applies who perform work that is funded with state funds. (FE)

Ordinance Public works Wage — Minimum Wage — Payment

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a city, village, town, or county may not enact and administer

an ordinance establishing a living wage (local living wage ordinance), which is

defined under current law as compensation sufficient to enable an employee to

maintain himself or herself under conditions consistent with his or her welfare.

Current law, however, exempts from that prohibition an ordinance that requires an

employee of a county, city, village, or town, an employee who performs work under

a contract for the provision of services to a county, city, village, or town, or an

employee who performs work that is funded by financial assistance from a county,

city, village, or town to be paid at a minimum wage rate specified in the ordinance.

This bill provides that a local living wage ordinance is preempted with respect

to an employee who performs work that is funded, in whole or in part, with funds of

the state or federal funds passing through the state treasury.

Under current law, no local governmental unit may require, as a condition of

employment, that any employee or prospective employee reside within any

jurisdictional limit.

This bill prohibits a local governmental unit from requiring that any laborer,

worker, mechanic, or truck driver employed on a project of public works to which the

prevailing wage law applies who performs work that is funded, in whole or in part,

with funds of this state or federal funds passing through the state treasury reside

within any jurisdictional limit. Generally, the prevailing wage law applies to any

single-trade project of public works for which the estimated project cost of

completion is $48,000 or more and to any multiple-trade project of public works for

which the estimated project cost of completion is $100,000 or more.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Grothman (R)

1 cosponsors

Kapenga (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Mar 7, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 20, 2014 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Grothman; cosponsored by Representative Kapenga

  2. Feb 20, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Local Government

  3. Feb 24, 2014 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Economic Development and Local Government and rereferred to committee on Judiciary and Labor pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  4. Mar 3, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 5, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Risser

  6. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Mar 7, 2014 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  9. Mar 7, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 8, 2014 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1