Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: local regulation of nonmetallic mining and preservation of marketable nonmetallic mineral deposits. (FE)
Land Mine and mining Mineral rights Minority groups Municipality Ordinance Road — Construction and repair Transportation, department of — Roads
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Zoning
Under current law, a political subdivision (a city, village, town that is
authorized to exercise village powers, or county) is authorized to enact zoning
ordinances that regulate and restrict the height, number of stories, and size of
buildings and other structures, the percentage of lot that may be occupied, the size
of yards and other open spaces, the density of population, the location and use of
buildings, structures, and land for various purposes, and the areas in which
agriculture, industry, mining, and other activities may be conducted. If a county has
a county zoning ordinance, current law requires that before a town that is authorized
to exercise village powers may enact or amend a zoning ordinance, the town must
obtain county board approval. Similar authority to zone may be exercised by towns
that are not authorized to exercise village powers (limited towns) if certain
conditions are met, including a situation under which the town is located in a county
that does not have a county zoning ordinance and the county fails to enact such an
ordinance after the town petitions the county to do so.
Also under current law, a zoning ordinance enacted by a political subdivision
or limited town may not prohibit the continued lawful use of any building, premises,
structure, or fixture for any trade or industry for which the building, premises,
structure, or fixture is used when the ordinance takes effect, although in limited
towns such an ordinance may prohibit the alteration of, or addition to, any existing
building, premises, structure, or fixture that is used to carry on an otherwise
prohibited trade or industry within the area that is subject to the ordinance (district).
In political subdivisions, the alteration of, addition to, or repair in excess of 50
percent of the assessed value of any existing building, premises, structure, or fixture
to carry on any prohibited trade or industry within the district may be prohibited.
Generally, if such a nonconforming use of a building, premises, structure, or fixture
is discontinued for 12 months, any future use of the building, premises, structure,
or fixture must conform to the political subdivision's zoning ordinance. Under county
law, the continued use of a nonconforming temporary structure may be prohibited.
Under a current decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court,
Zwiefelhofer v. Town
of Cooks Valley
, 338 Wis. 2d 488 (2012), the court held that a town ordinance enacted
under its police power, which regulated nonmetallic mining in the town, did not
require county board approval because the ordinance enacted by the town was not
a zoning ordinance. Because the town of Cooks Valley was authorized to exercise
village powers, its zoning ordinances must be approved by the county board. The
court stated that although the exercise of zoning authority is carried out under the
town's police power, not all ordinances enacted under the police power are zoning
ordinances. The court further held that although the town's nonmetallic mining
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 6, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Mar 6, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 26, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Tiffany; cosponsored by Representative Ballweg
- Feb 26, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue
- Mar 3, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 3, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 4, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 4, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany
- Mar 5, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Vinehout
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Vinehout
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 4 offered by Senator Vinehout
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 5 offered by Senator Vinehout
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 6 offered by Senator Vinehout
- Mar 21, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1