Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: limiting the security a town or municipality may require as a condition of plat approval.
Municipality — Planning Plats Public works
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a county, town, city, or village (approving authority) has the
right to approve or object to plat. A plat is a map of a subdivision, which is defined
under current law as a division of a unit of land by an owner for the purpose of a sale
or development and the sale or development results in at least five individual parcels
or building sites. Generally, the location of the subdivision determines which
approving authority or authorities have the right to approve or reject the plat.
Under current law, as a condition of approval, an approving authority may
require a subdivider to execute a surety bond or provide other security to ensure that
certain public improvements are made in connection with a project or a phase of a
project. This bill explicitly allows the subdivider to choose whether to satisfy such
a requirement with a performance bond or a letter of credit. Additionally, under the
bill, upon substantial completion of required public improvements, an approving
authority may not require a subdivider to maintain security in an amount that is
more than the total cost to complete any public improvements that are not completed
plus ten percent of the total cost of the completed public improvement and may not
require the subdivider to maintain the security for more than 12 months from the
date the public improvements are substantially completed. The bill defines
substantial completion as when the binder coat is installed on roads to be dedicated
or, in a case where no roads are to be dedicated, when 90 percent of the public
improvements by cost are completed.
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Mar 12, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 26, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Lasee; cosponsored by Representative Steineke
- Feb 26, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications
- Mar 5, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 10, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 12, 2014 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1