Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: physical qualifications for a restricted commercial driver license. (FE)
Disease District attorney Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Transportation projects commission Transportation, department of — Vehicles
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current statutes, an applicant for a commercial driver license (CDL)
must provide to the Department of Transportation (DOT) a certification that he or
she either: 1) meets all of the driver qualifications contained in federal regulations
or in an alternative federally-approved driver qualification program established by
DOT by rule; or 2) meets all of the driver qualifications for drivers in intrastate
commerce as established by DOT by rule and he or she is applying for a CDL valid
only in this state for intrastate operation. DOT may not issue a CDL valid for use
in interstate commerce to an applicant who does not meet federal physical
qualification requirements for drivers, including those under an alternative
federally-approved driver qualification program, but may issue to such an applicant
a CDL restricted to authorizing the operation of commercial motor vehicles only in
intrastate commerce (restricted CDL).
DOT's current rules adopt specified provisions of federal motor carrier safety
regulations and, subject to various exceptions, make them applicable to drivers and
vehicles operating in intrastate commerce in the same manner the federal
regulations apply to interstate operation. These adopted regulations include
regulations relating to physical qualifications of drivers, but there are certain
exceptions and a driver may apply to DOT to be granted an exception relating to
diabetes if the driver is operating only intrastate. Although the federal regulation
requires that a driver have no established medical history or clinical diagnosis of
diabetes mellitus currently requiring insulin for control, an exception in DOT's rules
is available to a driver with diabetes controlled by insulin who obtains statements
from two licensed physicians indicating that the diabetes is not likely to cause loss
of ability to control or operate a motor vehicle. However, a driver is not eligible for
this diabetes exception in DOT's rules if he or she has had any moving violations or
any reportable at-fault accidents while driving any motor vehicle within the
three-year period prior to the date of the application for the exception.
Under this bill, an applicant for a restricted CDL who has diabetes controlled
by insulin is not eligible for a restricted CDL if the applicant had, in the three-year
period prior to the date of the application, any moving violation, or any reportable
at-fault accident, due to diabetes while operating any motor vehicle. DOT may not
establish by rule a more restrictive eligibility standard relating to moving violations
and at-fault accidents for these applicants.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 13, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 28, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Schultz and T. Cullen; cosponsored by Representatives Murphy, Barnes, Hulsey and Bewley
- Feb 28, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Representative Thiesfeldt added as a cosponsor
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 13, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1