Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 648

Allowing county and municipal prisoners to be imprisoned in a bordering county within or outside of the state. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 24, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 28, 2014

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 18, 2014

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 376

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 24, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Counties Currently, counties may enter into cooperative agreements with other counties within the state regarding the building, maintenance, and use of the jails and rehabilitation facilities to detain prisoners before, during, and after trial. Counties generally share expenses in accordance with the cooperative agreement, but the county where a prisoner would be detained without the cooperative agreement provides transportation of the prisoner to and from court or as otherwise needed.

Under current law, only jails and rehabilitation facilities approved by the Department of Corrections (DOC) for the detention of prisoners may be used under the agreement.

Read the full summary

Current law also allows DOC to enter into contracts with other states to send prisoners who are in DOC custody to the other states. Under current law, any contract allowing for the transfer of a prisoner to another state must contain certain provisions, including a termination date, provisions regarding the treatment, care, and transfer of prisoners, prisoner participation in employment programs, reporting requirements, and retention of jurisdiction in this state over prisoners transferred.

Under this bill, a county in this state may enter into an agreement with a receiving county outside of the state to pay the receiving county to detain or imprison county prisoners before, during, and after trial if the other county borders the county in which the prisoner would otherwise be detained or imprisoned, and the monthly expenses charged to the county in this state by the receiving county to detain or imprison the prisoner are at least 25 percent less than the monthly expenses charged by the county in this state. The bill sets forth certain provisions that any contract allowing a county to transfer a county prisoner to another state, which generally mirror the requirements for a contract allowing the transfer of a state prisoner to another state. Under the bill, any contract between a county in this state and a receiving county in another state must include a requirement that the Department of Corrections or its equivalent agency or department in the receiving state approve the jail or facility in the receiving county to receive prisoners from the county in this state.

Municipalities Currently, if a person fails to pay a monetary judgment ordered by a municipal court, the court may suspend the person's motor vehicle operating privilege for up to two years under certain conditions, order the assignment of up to 25 percent of the person's earnings or other money due to the person to pay the judgment, order that the person be imprisoned for up to 90 days, with each day resulting in a credit of at least $50 of the unpaid judgment, or a combination of these remedies.

If the court orders that the person be imprisoned, the person is required to be committed to a jail or house of correction in the county in which the cause of action arose. Under this bill, if the court orders that the person be imprisoned, the person may be committed to a jail in a different county within or outside of the state if all of the following requirements are met:

1. The other county borders the county in which the cause of action arose.

2. The monthly expenses charged to the municipality by the other county to imprison the defendant are at least 25 percent less than the monthly expenses charged by the county in which the cause of action arose.

3. The other county agrees to having the defendant committed to a jail in that county.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Republican.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 13, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 24, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 24, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 376.

  3. Apr 22, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Mar 18, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 18, 2014

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 18, 2014

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Mar 18, 2014

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Mar 14, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Mar 13, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Mar 6, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 28, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs.

  13. Feb 28, 2014

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 28, 2014 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf and Vinehout; cosponsored by Representatives Billings, Doyle, Nass, Milroy, Kahl, Berceau, Danou, Ohnstad and Hulsey

  2. Feb 28, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs

  3. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 13, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 13, 2014 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  6. Mar 13, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Mar 17, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Harsdorf and Vinehout

  10. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Erpenbach

  11. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author

  12. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  21. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 26, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. Apr 22, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014

  29. Apr 24, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 376

  30. Apr 24, 2014 · Senate

    Published 4-24-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote