Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: the performance of highway improvement projects by a county and private construction projects by a political subdivision. (FE)
County Municipality Public works Road — Construction and repair Road — County Town Town — Officers Transportation, department of — Roads Village Vital statistics
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, as created in the 2011 Biennial Budget Act (Act 32), a county
is generally prohibited from using its own workforce to perform a highway
improvement project on a highway under the jurisdiction of another county or a
municipality that is located in a different county. A city with a population of 5,000
or more is prohibited from having a highway improvement project performed by a
county workforce unless the project is under, and meets the requirements of, the local
roads improvement program. Also under current law, as created in Act 32, a city,
village, town, or county may not use its own workforce to perform a construction
project for which a private person is financially responsible. This bill eliminates
these prohibitions.
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 21, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vinehout and Harris; cosponsored by Representatives Doyle, Hesselbein, Kolste, Ohnstad, Wright, Bewley and Berceau
- Mar 21, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Representative Doyle withdrawn as a cosponsor
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Representative Wright withdrawn as a cosponsor
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1