Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: regulating use of telephone automatic dialing-announcing devices and providing a penalty. (FE)
Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Telephone
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law prohibits certain telephone solicitors and their employees and
contractors from using an electronically prerecorded message in a telephone
solicitation without the consent of the recipient of the telephone call. The prohibition
applies to messages that encourage the recipient to purchase property, goods, or
services. The prohibition does not apply to nonprofit organizations, which are
excluded from the definition of "telephone solicitor."
This bill repeals the foregoing prohibition and instead prohibits any caller from
using an automatic dialing-announcing device to disseminate a prerecorded or
synthesized voice message unless an exception applies. The bill defines "automatic
dialing-announcing device" as a device that selects and dials telephone numbers and
that, working alone or in conjunction with other equipment, disseminates such a
message. The bill defines "caller" as any person who uses a telephone or telephone
line to contact or attempt to contact a telephone service subscriber or any person
living or residing with such a subscriber. Unlike current law, the bill is not limited
to telephone solicitors. Also unlike current law, nonprofit organizations are subject
to the prohibition. In addition, the bill applies to any type of message, and, unlike
current law, is not limited to messages encouraging the purchase of property, goods,
or services. In addition, the bill applies to any interstate or intrastate message that
is received by a person in this state.
The bill includes exceptions that allow a caller to use an automatic
dialing-announcing device under specified circumstances. First, a caller may use
such a device to contact or attempt to contact a telephone service subscriber who has
knowingly and voluntarily requested, consented to, permitted, or authorized receipt
of the message disseminated by the device. Another exception allows a caller to use
such a device if the disseminated message is immediately preceded by a live operator
who obtains the telephone service subscriber's consent before the message is
delivered. Also, the prohibition does not apply to messages from public school boards,
governing bodies of certain private schools, or charter school operators to their
students, parents, or employees. The prohibition also does not apply to messages
advising employees of work schedules.
Under current law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer
Protection (DATCP) enforces certain requirements regarding telephone solicitors.
The bill requires DATCP to also investigate violations of the bill and bring
enforcement actions for violations. The bill also creates a civil forfeiture of no more
than $100 for each violation of the bill, which is the same amount as the civil
forfeiture under current law for violating the telephone solicitor requirements.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Feb 6, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Risser, Cullen and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Ringhand, Hebl, Sinicki and Pope
- Feb 6, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications
- Feb 25, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1