Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

SB 97

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: prohibiting certain telephone calls using electronically prerecorded messages, rules for requesting a listing in the nonsolicitation directory, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Data processing Telephone

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law regulates "telephone solicitation," which is defined as the

unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation or text message for the purpose of

encouraging the recipient of the telephone call to purchase property, goods, or

services. Generally, under current law, a telephone solicitor may not make a

telephone solicitation to a residential customer if the customer's telephone number

is included in a nonsolicitation directory maintained by the Department of

Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) listing residential customers

who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations. Current law also prohibits a

telephone solicitor from using an electronically prerecorded message in a telephone

solicitation made to any recipient without the recipient's consent. Nonprofit

organizations are not subject to current law regulating telephone solicitations.

This bill prohibits any person from using an electronically prerecorded message

in an unsolicited telephone call to a residential customer whose telephone number

is included in the nonsolicitation directory, subject to the following exceptions: 1) a

call initiated by a school or school district to a student, a parent of a student, or an

employee; 2) a call initiated to a residential customer by a person who has a current

business or personal relationship with the customer; 3) a call initiated by a

governmental unit that is intended to alert a recipient of the call to a danger to the

recipient's health or safety; 4) a call initiated by a college or university to a graduate

of the college or university; and 5) a call initiated by a debt collector for the purpose

of collecting a debt.

Under the bill, DATCP must promulgate rules requiring any person who uses,

or requires an employee or contractor to use, an electronically prerecorded message

in a telephone call to a residential customer in this state, other than a call covered

by one of the exceptions in the bill, to register with and pay a fee to DATCP. A

registration is valid for one year and may be renewed upon payment of a renewal fee

to DATCP. Under the bill, registration and renewal fees for persons who use

electronically prerecorded messages must equal the fees charged for a telephone

solicitor under current law, except that the fees for nonprofit organizations may not

exceed one-tenth of the fee charged for a telephone solicitor.

Current law requires DATCP to promulgate rules establishing requirements

and procedures for a residential customer to request a listing in the nonsolicitation

directory. The rules must require a residential customer who requests a listing in

the directory to biennially notify DATCP if the residential customer wishes to

continue to be included in the directory. If a residential customer fails to make the

biennial notification, DATCP must eliminate the residential customer from the

nonsolicitation directory.

Under the bill, DATCP must promulgate rules establishing requirements and

procedures for a residential customer to request a listing in the nonsolicitation

directory, but the rules may not require a residential customer to periodically renew

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Cowles (R) , Harsdorf (R) , Lehman (D) , Leibham (R) , Olsen (R) , Risser (D) , Schultz (R) , T. Cullen (D)

20 cosponsors

Bernard Schaber (D) , Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Endsley (R) , Hintz (D) , Jacque (R) , Kestell (R) , Kolste (D) , Kooyenga (R) , Marklein (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Nerison (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Petryk (R) , Pope (D) , Ringhand (D) , Sargent (D) , Vruwink (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 May 29, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 May 29, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 22, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Leibham, Carpenter, Cowles, T. Cullen, Lehman, Olsen, Risser and Schultz; cosponsored by Representatives Jacque, Nerison, Hintz, Bernard Schaber, Bernier, Bies, Endsley, Kestell, Kolste, Kooyenga, Marklein, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Ohnstad, Petryk, Pope, Ringhand, Sargent and Vruwink

  2. Mar 22, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform

  3. Apr 10, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 16, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. May 23, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Harsdorf

  6. May 29, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. May 29, 2013 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. May 29, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. May 29, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 8, 2014 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1