Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: the purchase of food by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. (FE)
Food Purchasing, government University of wisconsin — Regents
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law generally authorizes state agencies to purchase materials,
supplies, or equipment under certain circumstances. With some exceptions,
purchases for which the estimated cost exceeds $50,000 require bids to be invited or
sealed proposals to be solicited and the order must be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder or most competitive sealed proposal. In determining the lowest
responsible bidder the agency must consider the location of the agency, the quantities
of the articles to be supplied, the conformity of the bids with the specifications in the
invitation to bid, and the purpose for which the materials, supplies, or equipment are
required and their delivery date. In determining the most competitive sealed
proposal, the agency must consider factors outlined in the solicitation for competitive
sealed proposals.
This bill creates an exception to these provisions if the Board of Regents of the
University of Wisconsin System (board) is purchasing food. Under this bill, when the
board is considering bids or proposals for the purchase of food, factors other than
price may not comprise more than 50 percent of the total factors used to determine
the lowest bid or most competitive sealed proposal.
Current law also provides that if the estimated cost of a purchase is $25,000 or
less, the department may use simplified procedures for making an award. This bill
allows the department to use simplified procedures if the estimated cost of a
purchase is $50,000 or less.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60
Failed 36–60 Jan 19, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 15, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Barca, Danou, Zepnick and Ohnstad
- Apr 15, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations
- May 11, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1