Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 166

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the purchase of food by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. (FE)

Food Purchasing, government University of wisconsin — Regents

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law generally authorizes state agencies to purchase materials,

supplies, or equipment under certain circumstances. With some exceptions,

purchases for which the estimated cost exceeds $50,000 require bids to be invited or

sealed proposals to be solicited and the order must be awarded to the lowest

responsible bidder or most competitive sealed proposal. In determining the lowest

responsible bidder the agency must consider the location of the agency, the quantities

of the articles to be supplied, the conformity of the bids with the specifications in the

invitation to bid, and the purpose for which the materials, supplies, or equipment are

required and their delivery date. In determining the most competitive sealed

proposal, the agency must consider factors outlined in the solicitation for competitive

sealed proposals.

This bill creates an exception to these provisions if the Board of Regents of the

University of Wisconsin System (board) is purchasing food. Under this bill, when the

board is considering bids or proposals for the purchase of food, factors other than

price may not comprise more than 50 percent of the total factors used to determine

the lowest bid or most competitive sealed proposal.

Current law also provides that if the estimated cost of a purchase is $25,000 or

less, the department may use simplified procedures for making an award. This bill

allows the department to use simplified procedures if the estimated cost of a

purchase is $50,000 or less.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barca (D) , Danou (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60

Failed 36–60 Jan 19, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 15, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Barca, Danou, Zepnick and Ohnstad

  2. Apr 15, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations

  3. May 11, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60

  5. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1