Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 191

Requiring drug testing and treatment for eligibility for certain work experience programs; requiring the Department of Health Services to request a waiver to screen and, if indicated, test and provide treatment to FoodShare employment and training participants for illegal use of a controlled substance; and making an appropriation. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on May 13, 2015, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 24, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 62 to 33

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) administers various work experience programs. The Transform Milwaukee Jobs program in Milwaukee County and the Transitional Jobs program outside of Milwaukee County provide work experience for unemployed individuals by providing a subsidy for wages and other employment expenses to employers that employ the individuals. Under the Wisconsin Works (W-2) program, DCF may provide job search assistance, placement in a subsidized job, or a stipend for up to four months to a noncustodial parent who would be eligible for W-2 except that he or she is not a custodial parent, if the noncustodial parent is subject to a child support order and the custodial parent of the noncustodial parent's child is a participant in W-2. Also under current law, DCF may contract with any county, tribal governing body, or W-2 agency to administer a work experience and job training program for noncustodial parents who have failed to pay child support due to unemployment or underemployment. Such individuals may be ordered by a court to register for a work experience and job training program.

This bill requires every individual who applies to participate in the Transform Milwaukee Jobs program or the Transitional Jobs program, who applies for W-2 services and benefits for noncustodial parents, or who applies for or is ordered by a court to register for a work experience and job training program (all four programs collectively, a program), to complete a questionnaire that screens for the abuse of a controlled substance. If, based on the answers to the questionnaire, DCF or the agency with which DCF has contracted to administer a program determines that there is a reasonable suspicion that an individual who is otherwise eligible for a program is abusing a controlled substance, the individual must undergo a test for the use of a controlled substance. If the test results are positive and the individual does not present satisfactory evidence that he or she has a valid prescription for the controlled substance, to remain eligible for a program the individual must participate in substance abuse treatment, the cost of which is paid by DCF. While the individual is undergoing treatment, he or she must submit to random testing for the use of a controlled substance, and the test results must be negative, or positive with evidence of a valid prescription, for the individual to remain eligible for a program. If any test results are positive and the individual does not have a valid prescription, the individual may begin treatment again one time and will remain eligible for a program as long as all test results are negative, or positive with a valid prescription. If the individual completes treatment and tests negative, or positive with a valid prescription, for the use of a controlled substance at the completion of treatment, he or she will have satisfactorily completed the substance abuse screening and testing and treatment requirements for the program.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the federal food stamp program, now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and called FoodShare in this state, assists eligible low-income individuals to purchase food. SNAP benefits are paid entirely with federal moneys. The cost of administration is split between the federal and state governments. The program is administered in this state by the Department of Health Services (DHS). Under current law, DHS may require a recipient of SNAP benefits who is able and who is 18 to 60 years of age to participate in the FoodShare employment and training program (FSET) to be eligible for SNAP benefits, unless the recipient is participating in a Wisconsin Works employment position, is the caretaker of a child under the age of six years, or is enrolled at least half time in school or in a training program or an institution of higher education.

This bill requires DHS to submit to the secretary of the federal Department of Agriculture a request for a waiver that would authorize DHS to screen and, if indicated, test and treat participants in the FSET program who are childless adults for use of a controlled substance without a valid prescription for the controlled substance. The waiver must include certain provisions regarding testing procedures, treatment, and eligibility for continued participation in the FSET program. If the waiver is approved, DHS must submit a plan, consistent with the approved waiver, to the joint committee on finance (JCF) for approval. The plan must also include a cost estimate for state-sponsored treatment. If JCF approves the plan, DHS must then screen and, if indicated, test and treat FSET participants who are childless adults for use of a controlled substance without a valid prescription for the controlled substance. The bill also requires that if the waiver is approved in the 2015-17 fiscal biennium, DHS must address any future fiscal impact resulting from the requirements in its biennial budget request for the 2017-19 fiscal biennium.

Who's behind it

17 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 17 are Republicans.

See all 17 names

Authors (17)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Public Benefit Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 6 · May 7, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 6”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 62 to 33 · May 13, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 14 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 33”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 62 to 33 · May 13, 2015 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (62)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 62, Noes 33”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 62 to 33 · May 13, 2015 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (62)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 33”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 63 to 32 · May 13, 2015 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (63)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 63, Noes 32”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Aug 26, 2015

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  3. Jun 10, 2015

    The Senate received it.

  4. Jun 9, 2015

    “Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)” (the official wording)

  5. May 13, 2015

    The Assembly passed it, 62 to 33.

  6. May 13, 2015

    “Point of order that Assembly Amendment 13 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken” (the official wording)

  7. May 12, 2015

    “Emergency statement attached by Governor pursuant to s. 16.47(2), Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  8. May 7, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. May 7, 2015

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 6.

  10. May 6, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. May 5, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Apr 30, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Apr 24, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Benefit Reform.

  14. Apr 24, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 24, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Rohrkaste, Knodl, Jagler, Gannon, A. Ott, Murphy, R. Brooks, Kerkman, Quinn, T. Larson, Edming, Macco, Petersen, Kleefisch, Kapenga, Ballweg and Kremer

  2. Apr 24, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Benefit Reform

  3. Apr 29, 2015 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  4. Apr 30, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  6. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Goyke, Jorgensen, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  7. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  8. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  9. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representatives Subeck, Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste and Spreitzer

  10. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  11. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 6 offered by Representatives Spreitzer, Goyke, Jorgensen, Kolste and Subeck

  12. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 7 offered by Representatives Kolste, Jorgensen, Goyke, Spreitzer and Subeck

  13. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 8 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  14. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 9 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  15. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 10 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  16. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 11 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  17. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 12 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  18. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  19. May 6, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  20. May 6, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  21. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 6

  22. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  23. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-13-2015 by Committee on Rules

  24. May 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Emergency statement attached by Governor pursuant to s. 16.47(2), Wisconsin Statutes

  25. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  26. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 13 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  27. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly Amendment 13 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  28. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  29. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 62, Noes 33

  30. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 14 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  31. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 14 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 33

  32. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  33. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  34. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 33

  35. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 63, Noes 32

  36. Jun 9, 2015 · Assembly

    Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)

  37. Jun 10, 2015 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  38. Aug 26, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Human Services

  39. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote