Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 192

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: requiring certain unemployment insurance claimants to submit to drug tests, eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits following a drug test, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Alcohol and other drug abuse Drugs Drugs — Criminal acts and law enforcement Unemployment insurance Workforce development, department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under federal law, a state may require a claimant to submit to a test for the

unlawful use of controlled substances (drug test) as a condition of receiving

unemployment insurance (UI) benefits if the claimant: 1) was terminated from

employment with his or her most recent employer because of the unlawful use of

controlled substances; or 2) is an individual for whom suitable work, as defined under

a state's UI law, is only available in an occupation that regularly conducts drug

testing, as determined in regulations issued by the United States Secretary of Labor

(federal regulations). As of April 20, 2015, final federal regulations have not been

issued.

This bill requires the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) to

establish a program to require claimants who apply for regular UI benefits to submit

to drug tests. The bill requires DWD to determine, when a claimant applies for

regular UI benefits, whether the claimant is an individual for whom suitable work

is only available in an occupation described in the federal regulations. If DWD

determines that the claimant is such an individual, DWD must conduct a screening

on the claimant to determine whether there is a reasonable suspicion that the

claimant has engaged in the unlawful use of controlled substances. If the screening

indicates such a reasonable suspicion, DWD must require the claimant to submit to

a drug test.

The bill provides that, if the claimant declines to submit to such a test, the

claimant is ineligible for UI benefits for 52 weeks or until a subsequent claim for

benefits, whichever is later. If the claimant submits to the drug test, but does not test

positive for any controlled substance without a valid prescription, the claimant may

receive UI benefits if otherwise eligible and may not be required to submit to any

further drug test until a subsequent claim for benefits. If the claimant submits to

the drug test and tests positive for one or more controlled substances without a valid

prescription, the bill provides that the claimant is ineligible for UI benefits for 52

weeks or until a subsequent claim for benefits, whichever is later, except that

following the positive test, the claimant may maintain his or her eligibility for UI

benefits by enrolling in a state-sponsored substance abuse treatment program and

undergoing a state-sponsored job skills assessment. The claimant remains eligible

for benefits for each week the claimant is in full compliance with any requirements

of the substance abuse treatment program and job skills assessment.

The bill also requires DWD to conduct, every ten years, a survey of employers

to identify occupations for which employers require pre-employment, random, or

reasonable suspicion drug testing as a condition of obtaining or continuing

employment. The bill then requires DWD to promulgate rules identifying

occupations for which more than 50 percent of employers so surveyed indicated that

drug testing is required as a condition of obtaining or continuing employment, as well

as additional rules identifying occupations in certain specified categories listed in

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Edming (R) , Gannon (R) , Jagler (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kremer (R) , Macco (R) , Murphy (R) , Petersen (R) , Quinn (R) , R. Brooks (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , T. Larson (R)

1 cosponsors

Olsen (R)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 13 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 13, Noes 0

Passed 13–0 May 7, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 14 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 4

Passed 9–4 May 7, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 6

Passed 8–6 May 7, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly Amendment 16 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 33

Passed 62–33 May 13, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 62, Noes 33

Passed 62–33 May 13, 2015 official source full page

Aye · 62

Not voting · 4

Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 63, Noes 32

Passed 63–32 May 13, 2015 official source full page

Aye · 63

Not voting · 4

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 62, Noes 33

Passed 62–33 May 13, 2015 official source full page

Aye · 62

Not voting · 4

Full history

  1. Apr 24, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Rohrkaste, Knodl, Jagler, Gannon, A. Ott, Murphy, R. Brooks, Kerkman, Quinn, T. Larson, Edming, Macco, Petersen, Kleefisch, Kapenga and Kremer; cosponsored by Senator Olsen

  2. Apr 24, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Benefit Reform

  3. Apr 30, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 7 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  5. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 8 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  6. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 9 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  7. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 10 offered by Representatives Spreitzer, Goyke, Kolste, Jorgensen and Subeck

  8. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 11 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  9. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 12 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  10. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 13 offered by Representative Rohrkaste

  11. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  12. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Goyke, Jorgensen, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  13. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  14. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  15. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representatives Subeck, Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste and Spreitzer

  16. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representatives Spreitzer, Goyke, Jorgensen, Kolste and Subeck

  17. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 6 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  18. May 6, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 14 offered by Representative Rohrkaste

  19. May 6, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  20. May 6, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  21. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 13 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  22. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 14 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 4

  23. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 6

  24. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  25. May 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-13-2015 by Committee on Rules

  26. May 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Emergency statement attached by Governor pursuant to s. 16.47(2), Wisconsin Statutes

  27. May 12, 2015 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  28. May 12, 2015 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 14)

  29. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  30. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 13 adopted

  31. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 14 adopted

  32. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 15 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  33. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly Amendment 15 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  34. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  35. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 62, Noes 33

  36. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 16 offered by Representatives Jorgensen, Goyke, Kolste, Spreitzer and Subeck

  37. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 16 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 33

  38. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  39. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  40. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 63, Noes 32

  41. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 62, Noes 33

  42. Jun 9, 2015 · Assembly

    Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)

  43. Jun 10, 2015 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  44. Jun 12, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs

  45. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1