Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 209

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: commercial driver licenses. (FE)

Bus and truck Fraud Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Regulation Telephone

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes a number of miscellaneous changes to the statutes related to

commercial motor vehicles (CMVs), including the following:

1. Current law prohibits inattentive driving of a motor vehicle, which means

that a driver of a motor vehicle may not be so engaged or occupied as to interfere with

the safe driving of the vehicle. Current law also specifically prohibits a person who

holds a probationary license or instruction permit from driving a motor vehicle while

using a cellular or other wireless telephone, except to report an emergency.

This bill specifically prohibits a person from driving a CMV while using a

cellular telephone or other wireless telephone, except to report an emergency.

2. Under current law, a person's operator's license may be cancelled for a

variety of reasons. For example, a license may be cancelled if the Department of

Transportation (DOT) finds that the application for the license contained a material

false statement or if a license has been altered and returned to DOT for cancellation.

This bill specifies that the license of a person who secures, or attempts to secure,

a license or endorsement by hiring or permitting another to appear in the person's

place to take an examination or otherwise gaining or attempting to gain a passing

score in an examination by fraud or otherwise obtain a commercial driver license

(CDL) or CDL endorsement by fraud may be cancelled by DOT.

3. Under current law, if DOT has good cause to believe that a licensed operator

is not qualified to be licensed, DOT may require the licensee to submit to an

examination. After the examination, DOT may take any necessary action, including

cancelling the license or permitting the licensee to retain the license subject to

restrictions.

Under this bill, if DOT receives credible information that a person holding a

CDL committed fraud related to the issuance of the CDL, DOT must require the

person to submit to an examination.

4. Under current law, a person licensed to drive a CMV may be disqualified from

operating a CMV for several reasons. Among these, a person may be disqualified

upon being convicted of certain traffic-related offenses that are classified as "serious

traffic violations." A person who is convicted of committing two serious traffic

violations within a three-year period is disqualified from operating a CMV for 60

days and a person who is convicted of committing three serious traffic violations

within a three-year period is disqualified from operating a CMV for 120 days.

Under this bill, driving a motor vehicle while composing or sending a text

message and driving a CMV while using a cellular or other wireless phone are

classified as serious traffic violations.

Also under this bill, a person whose CDL is cancelled because the person

secured, or attempted to secure, a license or endorsement by hiring or permitting

another to appear in the person's place to take an examination or otherwise gained

or attempted to gain a passing score in an examination by fraud or otherwise obtain

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ripp (R) , Spiros (R)

1 cosponsors

Petrowski (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0

Passed 14–0 Sep 18, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0

Passed 14–0 Sep 18, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0

Passed 14–0 Sep 18, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Spiros, Ripp and A. Ott; cosponsored by Senator Petrowski

  2. May 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. May 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jun 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Spiros

  6. Aug 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Spiros

  7. Aug 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Sep 15, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Sep 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  10. Sep 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Sep 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  12. Sep 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  13. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1