Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 216

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: community school start-up grants and making an appropriation. (FE)

Public instruction, department of School School — Board

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) to create a

community school start-up grant program, under which DPI awards competitive

grants to school boards to plan and implement community schools. The bill defines

a community school as a public school other than a charter school that focuses on

improving student learning, strengthening families, developing healthier

communities, working with community partners to provide additional services to the

surrounding community and providing wrap-around support services to pupils and

their families.

The bill requires that under the community school start-up grant program DPI

must allocate portions of the program funding to establishing community schools in

rural school districts, to establishing community schools in high-poverty school

districts, and to transforming low-performing schools into community schools. The

bill also requires an applicant for a community school start-up grant to demonstrate

that it has secured matching funds for the grant and to identify a school resource

coordinator who will coordinate school programming. An applicant for a community

school start-up grant must also describe the types of programming the school will

provide to improve student learning, strengthen families, and develop a healthier

community. A community school start-up grant is for five years and may be renewed

for additional five-year terms.

Finally, the bill requires a recipient of a community school start-up grant to

provide an annual report to DPI.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Johnson (D) , Mason (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Young (D)

4 cosponsors

C. Larson (D) , Harris Dodd (D) , Miller (D) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Education and take up, Ayes 35, Noes 61

Failed 35–61 Jan 12, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Barnes, Pope, Genrich, Johnson, Goyke, Mason, Riemer, Ohnstad, Brostoff, Hebl, Subeck, Young, Hesselbein, Spreitzer, Berceau, Sinicki, Sargent, Bowen and Wachs; cosponsored by Senators C. Larson, Wirch, Harris Dodd and Miller

  2. May 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. May 27, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Education and take up, Ayes 35, Noes 61

  5. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1