Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 231

Prohibiting abusive work environments and permitting a person who has been subjected to such an environment to bring a civil action

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 19, 2015

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law.

Under current law, worker's compensation is generally the exclusive remedy of an employee against his or her employer, a coemployee, or the employer's worker's compensation insurer for an injury sustained while performing services growing out of and incidental to employment.

Read the full summary

Civil action for abusive work environment.

This bill provides an exception to that exclusive remedy provision. Under this bill, an employee who alleges that he or she has been injured by being subjected to an abusive work environment or by being subjected to retaliation or a threat of retaliation for opposing an abusive work environment or for initiating, or in any manner participating in, an investigation, action, or proceeding to enforce the right not to be subjected to an abusive work environment (collectively "unlawful employment practice") may bring an action in circuit court against the employer or employee who allegedly engaged in the unlawful employment practice for such relief as the court may consider appropriate.

The aggrieved employee must commence an action within one year after the last act constituting the unlawful employment practice occurred.

Relief.

If the circuit court finds that an employer or employee has engaged in an unlawful employment practice, the court may enjoin the employer or employee from engaging in that practice and may grant such other relief as the court may consider appropriate, including reinstatement of the aggrieved employee, removal from the aggrieved employee's work area of the person who engaged in the abusive conduct, medical expenses, back pay, front pay, compensation for pain and suffering, compensation for emotional distress, punitive damages, and reasonable costs and attorney fees. If the circuit court orders payment of money because of an unlawful employment practice engaged in by an employee, the employer of the employee is liable for that payment. If an employer is found to have engaged in an unlawful employment practice that did not result in an adverse employment action against the aggrieved employee, the employer is not liable for compensation for emotional distress or punitive damages unless the abusive conduct was extreme and outrageous.

Affirmative defenses.

The bill allows an employer or employee against whom an aggrieved employee brings an action for an unlawful employment practice to plead affirmative defenses as follows:

1. If the alleged unlawful employment practice did not result in an adverse employment action against the aggrieved employee, the employer may plead as an affirmative defense that a) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct the abusive conduct that was the basis for the aggrieved employee's cause of action; and b) the aggrieved employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of appropriate preventive or corrective opportunities the employer provided to prevent or correct that abusive conduct.

2. If the alleged unlawful employment practice resulted in an adverse employment action against the aggrieved employee, the employer may plead as an affirmative defense that the aggrieved employee's complaint is based on a) an adverse employment action that was reasonably taken for poor performance, misconduct, or economic necessity; b) an adverse employment action that was taken in response to a reasonable performance evaluation; or c) a reasonable investigation of a potentially illegal or unethical activity.

3. An employee who is alleged to have engaged in an unlawful employment practice may plead as an affirmative defense that the employee engaged in that practice at the direction of the employer under an actual or implied threat of an adverse employment action against the employee for not engaging in that practice.

Double recovery prohibited.

The bill requires the court to reduce the amount awarded for medical expenses, back pay, or front pay in an action for an unlawful employment practice by the amount of medical expenses or disability benefits that the employer's worker's compensation insurer, the employer, if self-insured, or the Department of Workforce Development (DWD), if the employer is uninsured, has paid or is obligated to pay under the worker's compensation law for an injury arising out of the same underlying behavior as the behavior giving rise to the unlawful employment practice and to order the employer to reimburse the insurer or DWD for the amount of the medical expenses or disability benefits that the insurer or DWD has paid or is obligated to pay under the worker's compensation law or for the amount awarded in the action for medical expenses, back pay, or front pay, whichever is less.

Similarly, the bill provides that, if the aggrieved employee recovers medical expenses, back pay, or front pay in an action for an unlawful employment practice arising out of the same underlying behavior as the behavior giving rise to an injury that is compensable under the worker's compensation law, the amount payable for medical expenses or disability benefits under the worker's compensation law for that injury is reduced by the amount recovered for medical expenses, back pay, or front pay under the unlawful employment practice action.

Definitions.

For purposes of the bill:

1. "Abusive work environment" means a work environment in which an employer or one or more of its employees, acting with intent to cause pain or distress to an employee, subjects that employee to abusive conduct that causes physical harm or psychological harm to that employee.

2. "Abusive conduct" means conduct, including acts or omissions, by an employer or employee, that a reasonable person would find to be abusive based on the severity, nature, and frequency of the conduct. "Abusive conduct" includes repeated infliction of verbal abuse such as derogatory remarks, insults, and epithets;

verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct that is threatening, intimidating, or humiliating; sabotage or undermining of an employee's work performance; or, as an aggravating factor, exploitation of an employee's known psychological or physical illness or disability. "Abusive conduct," however, does not include a single act unless that act is especially severe or egregious.

3. "Adverse employment action" means an action taken by an employer with respect to an employee that has the effect of a penalty, including dismissal or suspension from employment, demotion, denial of a promotion, unfavorable transfer or reassignment, reduction in compensation, or denial of increased compensation.

"Adverse employment action" also includes a situation in which an employee resigns from employment because the employee reasonably believes that he or she was subjected to an abusive work environment and, prior to the employee resigning, the employer was aware of the abusive conduct that gave rise to the abusive work environment and the employer failed to stop it.

Who's behind it

13 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 13 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 18 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (5)

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. May 19, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  3. May 19, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pope, Young, Johnson, Subeck, C. Taylor, Sargent, Sinicki, Zamarripa, Berceau, Mason, Kessler, Ohnstad and Considine; cosponsored by Senators Miller, Erpenbach, L. Taylor, C. Larson and Harris Dodd

  2. May 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor