Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: video recording of surgical procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and providing penalties. (FE)
Data processing Health services, department of — Health Health services, department of — Supportive living and treatment Hospitals Housing
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill creates a requirement for hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, or
any other places where surgical procedures are performed (surgical facilities) to offer
surgical patients the option to have their surgical procedures videotaped. Surgical
facilities must provide notice of the option and all related procedures and conditions
set forth in the bill. For purposes of this bill, a surgical procedure is one for which
a patient is given a general anesthetic. If a patient makes a request to have a surgical
procedure recorded, this bill requires that the surgical facility, or its designee, record
the surgical procedure with both audio and color video, and record with color video
any entryway to or exit from the surgical suite during the time reserved for the
surgery of the requesting patient, including preparation time. If the surgical patient
is incapacitated, the surgical facility is required to provide a person authorized by
the patient with notice of the option for video recording, and that person may request
that a recording be made. Similarly, if the surgical patient is a minor, the surgical
facility must notify a parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the option for video
recording and allow that person to make a request for a recording on behalf of the
minor. The bill also allows a physician or certain other individual who holds a valid
license or other credential that allows him or her to perform surgical procedures for
which a patient is under general anesthesia (surgical practitioner) and who is
scheduled to perform a surgical patient's surgical procedure to request that a
recording be made, and a surgical facility must comply with the request so long as
certain conditions are met, including that the surgical patient or person authorized
by the patient does not object. Under the bill, in certain limited emergency
circumstances, surgical facilities are not required to provide the option of recording.
In return for exercising the option to have a surgical procedure recorded, under
the bill, the surgical patient or, if applicable, parent, guardian, legal custodian, or
person authorized by the patient may disclose the recording only to limited
authorized individuals unless confidentiality is waived by the surgical practitioner.
Video recordings of surgical procedures created under this bill are otherwise treated
as patient health care records and are subject to the same protections as other
medical records including all criminal and civil penalties for improper disclosure or
destruction. The bill specifies that, once a recording is complete, the surgical facility
or its designee must preserve the recording as part of the patient's health care record
but delete copies of the recording from the recording device and elsewhere. Upon
request, the surgical facility must provide to the patient, person authorized by the
patient, or parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the patient one copy of the
recording free of charge. Recordings under this bill are admissible as evidence in any
civil or criminal action or proceeding related to any alleged act or omission depicted
in the recording.
Under this bill, a surgical patient may complete an advance request for
recording, which permits an individual who is of sound mind and over the age of 18
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Jun 4, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Brostoff, Quinn, Sargent and Subeck
- Jun 4, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health
- Jul 2, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 29, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Brostoff withdrawn as a coauthor
- Nov 2, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Sargent withdrawn as a coauthor
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1