Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 266

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: requiring or allowing persons who have committed certain offenses related to drunken driving to acquire an ignition interlock device in order to operate certain motor vehicles and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Drunken driving Implied consent or alcohol concentration Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Equipment Transportation, department of — Vehicles

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, no person may drive or operate a motor vehicle while under

the influence of an intoxicant or drug, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or

with a measurable amount of a controlled substance in his or her blood (OWI). A

person who does so is subject to penalties that increase, in terms of forfeitures or fines

assessed, periods of imprisonment imposed, and periods of time during which the

person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle is suspended or revoked, with each

subsequent offense. Current law allows most OWI offenders, after a waiting period

that increases with each subsequent OWI offense, to apply for an occupational

license that allows the person to operate a motor vehicle for certain limited activities

and within certain limited geographic boundaries.

Under current law, a law enforcement officer who arrests a person for an OWI

offense may request the person to take a chemical test to determine the amount of

alcohol in his or her blood or breath. Under certain other limited circumstances, the

officer may request the person to take the test before he or she is arrested. If the

person refuses to take the test, the officer takes possession of the person's driver's

license and issues the person a notice that the Department of Transportation (DOT)

will revoke the person's driving privilege for a minimum of one year and a maximum

of three years, depending on how many prior OWI offenses the person has committed.

Under current law, refusing to take a chemical test is counted as an OWI offense.

If the person takes the test and the test indicates that the person has committed an

OWI, the officer takes possession of the person's driver's license and DOT

administratively suspends the person's operating privilege for six months.

Under current law, a person whose operating privilege is administratively

suspended or revoked may, within ten days, submit a written request for DOT to

review his or her administrative suspension or revocation. A person whose operating

privilege is administratively suspended for failing a chemical test may apply for an

occupational license immediately. A person whose operating privilege is

administratively revoked for refusing a test may apply for an occupational license

after 30 days for a first OWI offense, after 90 days after a second OWI offense, and

after 120 days after a third or subsequent OWI offense. However, if the person has

committed two or more OWI offenses within the five years, current law requires him

or her to wait 12 months before he or she may apply for an occupational license.

Current law also requires DOT to administratively suspend or revoke a person's

operating privilege when it receives notification that a person has been convicted of

committing certain OWI-related offenses in this state or in another state or on tribal

land. The periods of suspension or revocation and the waiting periods for each

offense vary, but generally increase with the seriousness of the offense and the

number of prior OWI offenses the person has committed.

In addition to the administrative suspension for failing a test and the

administrative revocation for refusing a test, when a person is convicted of an OWI

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Edming (R) , Heaton (R) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Kahl (D) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Kulp (R) , Macco (R) , Quinn (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Sinicki (D) , Spiros (R) , Subeck (D)

9 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Carpenter (D) , Cowles (R) , Harris Dodd (D) , Hintz and Shankland , Kolste, Barca, Stuck, Zepnick, Wachs, Spreitzer, Meyers and Doyle , LeMahieu (R) , Sargent (D) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

Passed 12–1 Feb 12, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 1

Passed 13–1 Feb 12, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Heaton, Jacque, Sanfelippo, Subeck, Sinicki, Horlacher, Kitchens, Krug, Ripp, Rohrkaste, Edming, Ballweg, Quinn, Macco, Spiros, Kahl and Kulp; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Carpenter, Cowles, LeMahieu and Harris Dodd

  2. Jun 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Jun 30, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Allen added as a coauthor

  4. Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jul 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jul 22, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Sargent added as a coauthor

  8. Aug 18, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  9. Jan 28, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Heaton

  10. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  13. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  14. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Representatives Kolste, Barca, Stuck, Zepnick, Wachs, Spreitzer, Meyers and Doyle added as coauthors

  16. Feb 19, 2016 · Assembly

    Representatives Hintz and Shankland added as coauthors

  17. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1