Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: requiring or allowing persons who have committed certain offenses related to drunken driving to acquire an ignition interlock device in order to operate certain motor vehicles and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)
Drunken driving Implied consent or alcohol concentration Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Equipment Transportation, department of — Vehicles
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, no person may drive or operate a motor vehicle while under
the influence of an intoxicant or drug, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or
with a measurable amount of a controlled substance in his or her blood (OWI). A
person who does so is subject to penalties that increase, in terms of forfeitures or fines
assessed, periods of imprisonment imposed, and periods of time during which the
person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle is suspended or revoked, with each
subsequent offense. Current law allows most OWI offenders, after a waiting period
that increases with each subsequent OWI offense, to apply for an occupational
license that allows the person to operate a motor vehicle for certain limited activities
and within certain limited geographic boundaries.
Under current law, a law enforcement officer who arrests a person for an OWI
offense may request the person to take a chemical test to determine the amount of
alcohol in his or her blood or breath. Under certain other limited circumstances, the
officer may request the person to take the test before he or she is arrested. If the
person refuses to take the test, the officer takes possession of the person's driver's
license and issues the person a notice that the Department of Transportation (DOT)
will revoke the person's driving privilege for a minimum of one year and a maximum
of three years, depending on how many prior OWI offenses the person has committed.
Under current law, refusing to take a chemical test is counted as an OWI offense.
If the person takes the test and the test indicates that the person has committed an
OWI, the officer takes possession of the person's driver's license and DOT
administratively suspends the person's operating privilege for six months.
Under current law, a person whose operating privilege is administratively
suspended or revoked may, within ten days, submit a written request for DOT to
review his or her administrative suspension or revocation. A person whose operating
privilege is administratively suspended for failing a chemical test may apply for an
occupational license immediately. A person whose operating privilege is
administratively revoked for refusing a test may apply for an occupational license
after 30 days for a first OWI offense, after 90 days after a second OWI offense, and
after 120 days after a third or subsequent OWI offense. However, if the person has
committed two or more OWI offenses within the five years, current law requires him
or her to wait 12 months before he or she may apply for an occupational license.
Current law also requires DOT to administratively suspend or revoke a person's
operating privilege when it receives notification that a person has been convicted of
committing certain OWI-related offenses in this state or in another state or on tribal
land. The periods of suspension or revocation and the waiting periods for each
offense vary, but generally increase with the seriousness of the offense and the
number of prior OWI offenses the person has committed.
In addition to the administrative suspension for failing a test and the
administrative revocation for refusing a test, when a person is convicted of an OWI
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1
Passed 12–1 Feb 12, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 1
Passed 13–1 Feb 12, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 18, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Heaton, Jacque, Sanfelippo, Subeck, Sinicki, Horlacher, Kitchens, Krug, Ripp, Rohrkaste, Edming, Ballweg, Quinn, Macco, Spiros, Kahl and Kulp; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Carpenter, Cowles, LeMahieu and Harris Dodd
- Jun 18, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation
- Jun 30, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Allen added as a coauthor
- Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 10, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 22, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Sargent added as a coauthor
- Aug 18, 2015 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 28, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Heaton
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1
- Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Representatives Kolste, Barca, Stuck, Zepnick, Wachs, Spreitzer, Meyers and Doyle added as coauthors
- Feb 19, 2016 · Assembly
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1