Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: appeals of denials of kinship care payments based on arrest or conviction record. (FE)
Children and families, department of Court — Procedure Day care
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, monthly kinship care payments may be made to a relative
of a child (kinship care relative) who is providing care and maintenance for the chid
if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the county department
of human services or social services (county department) or, in Milwaukee County,
the Department of Children and Families (DCF) conducts a background
investigation of the kinship care relative, any employee and prospective employee of
the kinship care relative who has or would have regular contact with the child for
whom the payments would be made, and any other adult resident of the kinship care
relative's home to determine if the kinship care relative, employee, prospective
employee, or adult resident has any arrests or convictions that could adversely affect
the child or the kinship care relative's ability to care for the child (arrest or conviction
record). Current law permits a person who is denied kinship care payments based
on arrest or conviction record to request a review of that decision by the director of
the county department (county director) or, in Milwaukee County, by a person
designated by the secretary of children and families to conduct those reviews
(secretary's designee). Under current law, the decision of the county director or
secretary's designee is final and is not subject to further administrative review.
This bill permits a person who is aggrieved by a decision of a county director or
secretary's designee denying kinship care payments based on arrest or conviction
record to petition DCF for a hearing on that decision. Under the bill, DCF must give
the petitioner an opportunity for a fair hearing, and the decision of DCF after the
hearing is final, subject to judicial review or to revocation or modification as altered
conditions may require.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 4, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Vorpagel, Knodl, Krug, Mursau, Quinn, Spreitzer, Subeck and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators LeMahieu, Harris Dodd and Olsen
- Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law
- Sep 16, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 8, 2015 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1