Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 282

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: appeals of denials of kinship care payments based on arrest or conviction record. (FE)

Children and families, department of Court — Procedure Day care

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, monthly kinship care payments may be made to a relative

of a child (kinship care relative) who is providing care and maintenance for the chid

if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the county department

of human services or social services (county department) or, in Milwaukee County,

the Department of Children and Families (DCF) conducts a background

investigation of the kinship care relative, any employee and prospective employee of

the kinship care relative who has or would have regular contact with the child for

whom the payments would be made, and any other adult resident of the kinship care

relative's home to determine if the kinship care relative, employee, prospective

employee, or adult resident has any arrests or convictions that could adversely affect

the child or the kinship care relative's ability to care for the child (arrest or conviction

record). Current law permits a person who is denied kinship care payments based

on arrest or conviction record to request a review of that decision by the director of

the county department (county director) or, in Milwaukee County, by a person

designated by the secretary of children and families to conduct those reviews

(secretary's designee). Under current law, the decision of the county director or

secretary's designee is final and is not subject to further administrative review.

This bill permits a person who is aggrieved by a decision of a county director or

secretary's designee denying kinship care payments based on arrest or conviction

record to petition DCF for a hearing on that decision. Under the bill, DCF must give

the petitioner an opportunity for a fair hearing, and the decision of DCF after the

hearing is final, subject to judicial review or to revocation or modification as altered

conditions may require.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Mursau (R) , Quinn (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Vorpagel (R)

3 cosponsors

Harris Dodd (D) , LeMahieu (R) , Olsen (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Feb 4, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vorpagel, Knodl, Krug, Mursau, Quinn, Spreitzer, Subeck and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators LeMahieu, Harris Dodd and Olsen

  2. Jul 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Sep 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1