Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: legislative and congressional redistricting. (FE)
Legislative reference bureau Legislature Redistricting
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, under the state constitution, the legislature is directed to redistrict
legislative districts according to the number of inhabitants at its next session
following each decennial federal census. At the same intervals, the legislature also
reapportions congressional districts in this state pursuant to federal law. Under
current state law, following each decennial federal census, most municipalities are
also required to divide their territory into wards. With limited exceptions, wards are
required to consist of one or more whole, contiguous census blocks (the smallest
geographic units for which census results are available). Traditionally, the
legislature has used municipal wards to construct legislative and congressional
districts, although the legislature may adjust the boundaries of a municipal ward
and use the revised ward boundaries instead. Legislative and congressional
redistricting plans enacted pursuant to this procedure are used to elect members of
the legislature and members of Congress in the fall of the second year following the
year of the census.
This bill creates a new procedure for the preparation of legislative and
congressional redistricting plans. The bill directs the Legislative Reference Bureau
(LRB) to draw redistricting plans based upon standards specified in the bill and
establishes a Redistricting Advisory Commission to perform certain tasks in the
redistricting process. The bill also makes various other changes to the laws
governing redistricting. Significant aspects of the bill include:
Redistricting standards
Under the bill, a redistricting plan drawn by the LRB must satisfy several
criteria, including:
1. The plan must be based on population requirements imposed under the
Wisconsin Constitution and the U.S. Constitution and requirements imposed under
Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act, which, among other things, generally
prohibits redistricting plans from abridging the right to vote on account of race or
color or because a person is a member of a language minority group.
2. The senate and assembly districts established in the plan must satisfy equal
population standards specified in the bill. Among other things, no senate district
may have a population which exceeds that of any other senate district by more than
10 percent and no assembly district may have a population which exceeds that of any
other assembly district by more than 10 percent, unless necessary to maintain
compliance with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Congressional districts
established in the plan must each have a population as nearly equal as practicable
to the ideal population for such districts, while maintaining compliance with Section
2 of the Voting Rights Act.
3. District boundaries under the plan must coincide with municipal ward
boundaries and, to the extent consistent with the Wisconsin Constitution, the U.S.
Constitution, and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, must coincide with the
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Barca (D) , Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Danou (D) , Doyle (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Meyers (D) , Milroy (D) , Novak (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Campaigns and Elections and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 61
Failed 36–61 Feb 9, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 3, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Spreitzer, Considine, Bowen, Brostoff, Meyers, Subeck, Stuck, Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Billings, Danou, Doyle, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kolste, Mason, Milroy, Novak, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, C. Taylor, Wachs, Zamarripa and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Harris Dodd, Bewley, Carpenter, C. Larson, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, L. Taylor, Vinehout and Wirch
- Sep 3, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections
- Sep 30, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 5, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Campaigns and Elections and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 61
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1