Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 344

Lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number One in the village of Weston. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 11, 2015. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 23, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 3, 2015

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 32 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 75

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 11, 2015: “Published 11-12-2015”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development under certain conditions. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.

Read the full summary

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village (the 12 percent test), subject to one general exception. Under the exception, a city or village may simultaneously create a new TID and subtract territory from an existing TID without adopting a resolution containing the 12 percent test if the city or village demonstrates to DOR that the value of the territory that is subtracted at least equals the amount that DOR believes is necessary to ensure that, when the new TID is created, the 12 percent test is met. The city or village must also certify to DOR that no other district created under this exception currently exists in the city or village.

Under this bill, with regard to TID Number One in the village of Weston, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 28 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 33 years after the TID's creation, the maximum life of the TID is extended for ten years, and the 12 percent test does not apply, on a one-time basis, if the limit is exceeded because of the amendment of the project plan of that TID.

Who's behind it

John Spiros, a Republican, is its ⁠.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 3 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 21, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Nov 5, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Nov 5, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Nov 5, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Nov 6, 2015 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 11, 2015

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 11, 2015

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 75.

  3. Nov 10, 2015

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 6, 2015

    The Senate passed it too, 32 to 0.

  5. Nov 5, 2015

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Nov 5, 2015

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Nov 5, 2015

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Nov 5, 2015

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Nov 3, 2015

    The Senate received it.

  10. Nov 3, 2015

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Oct 21, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Oct 21, 2015

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  13. Oct 15, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. Oct 15, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Oct 2, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Sep 23, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  17. Sep 23, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Spiros; cosponsored by Senator Petrowski

  2. Sep 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Oct 2, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 15, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 15, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor

  6. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  8. Oct 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-3-2015 by Committee on Rules

  10. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  11. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Nov 3, 2015 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  18. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  20. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  21. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  22. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-6-2015 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  27. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Nov 9, 2015 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Nov 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-10-2015

  30. Nov 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2015

  31. Nov 11, 2015 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-11-2015. 2015 Wisconsin Act 75

  32. Nov 11, 2015 · Assembly

    Published 11-12-2015

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote