Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: requiring persons accused of violating traffic laws and ordinances related to driving while intoxicated to appear in person in court. (FE)
Circuit court Court — Fee Court — Municipal Court — Procedure Drunken driving Early childhood education Motor vehicle — Regulation Motor vehicle — Regulation — Speed Ordinance Service of process and papers
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, generally, a first violation of operating a vehicle while under
the influence of an intoxicant, with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled
substance in one's blood, or with a prohibited alcohol concentration (OWI-related
violation), is a traffic violation punishable by a civil forfeiture. Current law allows
local units of government to enact ordinances in conformity with the state traffic law
that punishes most first OWI-related offenses as a civil violation.
Under current law, a person who receives a citation for an OWI-related civil
traffic violation or who receives a citation for an ordinance in conformity with the
OWI-related traffic violation may opt to appear in court to plead not guilty to the
violation or may opt to pay the forfeiture associated with the violation and avoid an
appearance in court. Generally, a person who pays the forfeiture associated with the
violation is considered to have pled guilty or no contest to the charge.
Under this bill, a person who receives a citation for an OWI-related civil traffic
violation or who receives a citation for an ordinance in conformity therewith is
required to appear in court to plead guilty, no contest, or not guilty to the charge.
Under the bill, if the person fails to appear in court, the court is required to enter a
default judgment against the person and impose the applicable penalties, except that
the court must withhold imposing a forfeiture until the person appears in person
before the court. Under the bill, the court issues a warrant for the person's arrest so
that the person may appear before the court in order for the court to impose a
forfeiture. Additionally, under the bill, the person is required to pay a $300
surcharge that is retained by the municipal court or the clerk of circuit court to offset
the costs of holding a hearing to impose the forfeiture.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Nov 13, 2015 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1
Passed 8–1 Nov 13, 2015 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 25, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives J. Ott, Allen, Sanfelippo, Berceau, T. Larson, Rohrkaste, E. Brooks, Horlacher, Murphy, Edming, Kitchens, Genrich, Kerkman, Sargent and Kooyenga; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Nass, Carpenter and Marklein
- Sep 25, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety
- Sep 29, 2015 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety and referred to committee on Judiciary pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
- Sep 29, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Jacque added as a coauthor
- Oct 1, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Wachs added as a coauthor
- Oct 7, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 15, 2015 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 22, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 27, 2015 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative J. Ott
- Oct 29, 2015 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 17, 2016 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 17, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1