Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 352

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: requiring persons accused of violating traffic laws and ordinances related to driving while intoxicated to appear in person in court. (FE)

Circuit court Court — Fee Court — Municipal Court — Procedure Drunken driving Early childhood education Motor vehicle — Regulation Motor vehicle — Regulation — Speed Ordinance Service of process and papers

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, generally, a first violation of operating a vehicle while under

the influence of an intoxicant, with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled

substance in one's blood, or with a prohibited alcohol concentration (OWI-related

violation), is a traffic violation punishable by a civil forfeiture. Current law allows

local units of government to enact ordinances in conformity with the state traffic law

that punishes most first OWI-related offenses as a civil violation.

Under current law, a person who receives a citation for an OWI-related civil

traffic violation or who receives a citation for an ordinance in conformity with the

OWI-related traffic violation may opt to appear in court to plead not guilty to the

violation or may opt to pay the forfeiture associated with the violation and avoid an

appearance in court. Generally, a person who pays the forfeiture associated with the

violation is considered to have pled guilty or no contest to the charge.

Under this bill, a person who receives a citation for an OWI-related civil traffic

violation or who receives a citation for an ordinance in conformity therewith is

required to appear in court to plead guilty, no contest, or not guilty to the charge.

Under the bill, if the person fails to appear in court, the court is required to enter a

default judgment against the person and impose the applicable penalties, except that

the court must withhold imposing a forfeiture until the person appears in person

before the court. Under the bill, the court issues a warrant for the person's arrest so

that the person may appear before the court in order for the court to impose a

forfeiture. Additionally, under the bill, the person is required to pay a $300

surcharge that is retained by the municipal court or the clerk of circuit court to offset

the costs of holding a hearing to impose the forfeiture.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Allen (R) , Berceau (D) , E. Brooks (R) , Edming (R) , Genrich (D) , Horlacher (R) , J. Ott (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kitchens (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Murphy (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Sargent (D) , T. Larson (R)

7 cosponsors

Carpenter (D) , Darling (R) , Jacque (R) , Kremer and Barca , Marklein (R) , Nass (R) , Wachs (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Nov 13, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1

Passed 8–1 Nov 13, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 25, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives J. Ott, Allen, Sanfelippo, Berceau, T. Larson, Rohrkaste, E. Brooks, Horlacher, Murphy, Edming, Kitchens, Genrich, Kerkman, Sargent and Kooyenga; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Nass, Carpenter and Marklein

  2. Sep 25, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Sep 29, 2015 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety and referred to committee on Judiciary pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  4. Sep 29, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Jacque added as a coauthor

  5. Oct 1, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Wachs added as a coauthor

  6. Oct 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 15, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Oct 22, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Oct 27, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative J. Ott

  10. Oct 29, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  12. Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  13. Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 by Committee on Rules

  15. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  16. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  18. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Representatives Kremer and Barca added as coauthors

  22. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Feb 17, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  24. Feb 17, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  25. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1