Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 364

Reporting, disclosure, and practitioner review requirements under the prescription drug monitoring program; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 17, 2016. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 25, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 12, 2016

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 20, 2016

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 266

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 17, 2016: “Published 3-18-2016”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes a number of changes to the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) administered by the Controlled Substances Board (board).

Under the bill, a pharmacy or practitioner generating a record under the PDMP when a monitored prescription drug is dispensed is required to submit the record to the board no later than 11:59 p.m. of the next business day after the monitored prescription drug is dispensed. Currently, there is no specific time frame required for the submission to the board of a record generated under the PDMP.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the rules promulgated by the board implementing the PDMP must specify the persons to whom a record may be disclosed and the circumstances under which the disclosure may occur, including disclosure to relevant state boards and agencies, relevant agencies of other states, and relevant law enforcement agencies under circumstances indicating suspicious or critically dangerous conduct or practices of a pharmacy, pharmacist, practitioner, or patient.

The bill adds disclosure to relevant prosecutorial units, and the bill specifies that disclosure of a record generated under the PDMP is authorized under the following additional circumstances:

1. The state board or agency, agency of another state, law enforcement agency, or prosecutorial unit makes a written request for the record and is engaged in an active and specific investigation or prosecution of a violation of any state or federal law involving a monitored prescription drug, and the record being requested is reasonably related to that investigation or prosecution.

2. The state board or agency, agency of another state, law enforcement agency, or prosecutorial unit makes a written request for the record and is monitoring the patient as part of a drug court.

The bill further permits disclosure to a practitioner, pharmacist, registered nurse, or substance abuse counselor who is treating or rendering assistance to the patient for whom the record was generated and under other specific circumstances.

Finally, the bill authorizes disclosure of a record generated under the PDMP to a person who medically coordinates, directs, or supervises, or establishes standard operating procedures for, a practitioner, pharmacist, registered nurse, or substance abuse counselor to whom records may otherwise be disclosed, if the person is evaluating the job performance of the practitioner, pharmacist, registered nurse, or substance abuse counselor, or is performing quality assessment and improvement activities, including outcomes evaluation or development of clinical guidelines, and if the disclosure is limited to only those records about the practitioner, pharmacist, registered nurse, or substance abuse counselor.

Who's behind it

33 lawmakers are its ⁠. 26 are Republicans and 7 are Democrats.

16 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 49 names

Authors (33)

Signed on in support (16)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 23, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 23, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 19, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 17, 2016

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 17, 2016

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 266.

  3. Mar 16, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 20, 2016

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Jan 20, 2016

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  6. Jan 19, 2016

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Jan 15, 2016

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  8. Jan 13, 2016

    The Senate received it.

  9. Jan 12, 2016

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Jan 12, 2016

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Oct 29, 2015 to Jan 7, 2016

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  12. Oct 23, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Oct 23, 2015

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  14. Oct 23, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Oct 20, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Oct 14, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Oct 14, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  18. Oct 12, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Oct 7, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  20. Sep 25, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.

  21. Sep 25, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 25, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Nygren, Petryk, Novak, Tauchen, Swearingen, Spiros, Jagler, A. Ott, Ripp, Kolste, Kerkman, Schraa, Ohnstad, Horlacher, Sinicki, Murtha, Edming, Loudenbeck, VanderMeer, Genrich, Meyers, Allen, Barca, Petersen, Kuglitsch, Knodl, Mursau, Macco, Sanfelippo, Born, Skowronski, J. Ott and Subeck; cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf, Gudex, Cowles, Marklein, Olsen, Petrowski, Hansen and Darling

  2. Sep 25, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Oct 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Ballweg added as a coauthor

  4. Oct 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Murphy added as a coauthor

  6. Oct 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Oct 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren

  9. Oct 22, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Oct 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Krug added as a coauthor

  11. Oct 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  12. Oct 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  13. Oct 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Oct 29, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Tranel added as a coauthor

  15. Nov 6, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Shankland added as a coauthor

  16. Jan 6, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Nygren

  17. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a coauthor

  18. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-12-2016 by Committee on Rules

  19. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  21. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  22. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  25. Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Jan 13, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  27. Jan 15, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  28. Jan 15, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  29. Jan 19, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  30. Jan 19, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-20-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  31. Jan 20, 2016 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  32. Jan 20, 2016 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  33. Jan 20, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  34. Jan 20, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  35. Jan 20, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  36. Jan 20, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  37. Jan 20, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  38. Jan 21, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  39. Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 1-26-2016

  40. Mar 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-16-2016

  41. Mar 17, 2016 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-17-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 266

  42. Mar 17, 2016 · Assembly

    Published 3-18-2016

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote