Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 432

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: revocation of operating privilege for certain offenses related to operating while intoxicated, operating after revocation, and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Drunken driving Early childhood education Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Equipment Transportation, department of — Vehicles

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill provides for permanent revocation of a person's operating privilege if

the person commits certain offenses related to drunken driving or driving under the

influence of an intoxicant or other drug (OWI offenses).

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may revoke or

suspend a person's operating privilege if the person commits certain traffic offenses

or crimes, such as operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The period of revocation

varies based on the reason for the revocation, generally ranging from several months

to a year. Suspensions of operating privileges may also be ordered by a court

adjudicating an underlying criminal or traffic offense. Suspensions by a court also

vary in length based on the underlying criminal or traffic offense, ranging from

several months to several years.

Also under current law, if a person's operating privilege is suspended or

revoked, the person may apply for an occupational license, which restricts when and

where the person is allowed to drive, such as to and from work. In most cases, the

person is eligible for an occupational license 15 days after the date of the suspension

or revocation. In some cases involving serious offenses, the person is not eligible for

an occupational license until one year after the date of the suspension or revocation.

Also under current law, with limited exceptions, DOT may reinstate a person's

revoked operating privilege if all of the following apply: 1) the period of revocation

has expired; 2) the person pays DOT all required fees; 3) the person passes any

examination required by DOT; and 4) with exceptions, the person files proof of

financial responsibility with DOT and maintains it for three years.

This bill requires DOT to permanently revoke the operating privilege of a

person who meets either of the following requirements:

1. The person has committed five or more OWI offenses.

2. The person has committed three or more OWI offenses and has two or more

"qualifying convictions." A qualifying conviction is 1) a conviction for certain

homicides that involve the use of a motor vehicle or 2) a conviction for certain felonies

involving the use of a motor vehicle.

A person whose operating privilege is revoked under this bill is not eligible for

an occupational license. After ten years of the revocation period have elapsed, the

person, however, may apply for reinstatement of his or her operating privilege. DOT

may reinstate the person's operating privilege if the person meets the general

requirements for reinstatement and all of the following apply: 1) the person has not

been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor during the ten-year period immediately

preceding the application for reinstatement; and 2) the person submits to and

complies with an assessment by an approved public treatment facility for

examination of the person's use of alcohol and controlled substances and

development of a driver safety plan for the person.

Current law prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle on a highway

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Allen (R) , Berceau (D) , Bowen (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Genrich (D) , Jacque (R) , Kitchens (R) , Kolste (D) , Loudenbeck (R) , Murphy (R) , Pope (D) , Steffen (R) , Subeck (D) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Wachs (D) , Weatherston (R) , Zepnick (D)

8 cosponsors

Barca and Shankland , C. Larson (D) , Darling (R) , Hintz (D) , Kahl (D) , Moulton (R) , Stuck, Sargent, Ohnstad, Spreitzer and Meyers , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Jan 15, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Jan 15, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Genrich, Jacque, Steffen, Murphy, Kolste, Subeck, Zepnick, Berceau, Kitchens, Bowen, Wachs, Loudenbeck, Thiesfeldt, Pope, Weatherston, Allen and C. Taylor; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Moulton, C. Larson and Darling

  2. Oct 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Nov 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Kahl added as a coauthor

  6. Dec 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Genrich

  7. Dec 17, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 15, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Genrich

  9. Jan 15, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  10. Jan 15, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  11. Jan 15, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 2:16 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  13. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Representatives Stuck, Sargent, Ohnstad, Spreitzer and Meyers added as coauthors

  14. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  17. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Feb 19, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Feb 19, 2016 · Senate

    Representatives Barca and Shankland added as coauthors

  23. Feb 23, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  24. Feb 23, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Feb 24, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Hintz added as a coauthor

  26. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1