Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 45

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: authorizing towns to participate in multijurisdictional tax incremental financing districts. (FE)

Property tax Town

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, any number of cities and villages (municipalities) may

jointly create a multijurisdictional TID (MJTID). Towns, which are limited in their

authority to create TIDs, may not participate in a MJTID. To create a MJTID,

municipalities must enter into an intergovernmental cooperation agreement to

create the MJTID. The agreement must specify a number of things, including the

proposed membership of the joint review board; a binding procedure to resolve

disputes; a procedure to dissolve the MJTID before it would otherwise be required

to terminate; a description of the responsibilities of each municipality's clerk,

treasurer, and assessor; specification of a lead municipality for purposes of

completing and submitting required documents; and procedures that will be followed

to amend the project plan or boundaries of the MJTID. A copy of the agreement must

be sent to DOR.

With regard to an MJTID, the district must be contiguous, its borders must

contain territory in all municipalities that are a party to the agreement, and at least

one parcel in each municipality must touch at least one parcel in at least one of the

other municipalities. The agreement must specify that the MJTID's application to

DOR will be submitted to DOR as one complete application and that the MJTID will

terminate at one time as a single entity. Generally, the current law provisions that

apply to all TIDs apply to MJTIDs.

Under this bill, any town that is authorized to create a TID within the town may

participate in a MJTID.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Jacque (R) , Kremer (R) , Krug (R) , Macco (R) , Murphy (R) , Spiros (R) , Steffen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)

3 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Cowles (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 11, Noes 0

Passed 11–0 Apr 8, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Commerce, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 May 21, 2015 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 17, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Krug, Steffen, Macco, Ballweg, Kremer, Murphy, Spiros and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators Cowles and Wanggaard

  2. Feb 17, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means

  3. Feb 18, 2015 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  4. Feb 24, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 31, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 2, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Allen added as a coauthor

  7. Apr 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  9. Apr 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 9, 2015 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-14-2015 by Committee on Rules

  11. Apr 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Apr 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Apr 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Apr 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Apr 15, 2015 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Apr 23, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Commerce

  18. May 20, 2015 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  19. May 20, 2015 · Senate

    Executive session held

  20. May 21, 2015 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Commerce, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  21. May 21, 2015 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Oct 19, 2015 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-20-2015 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Oct 20, 2015 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Oct 20, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Oct 20, 2015 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Oct 20, 2015 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Oct 20, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  30. Nov 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-3-2015

  31. Nov 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2015

  32. Nov 11, 2015 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-11-2015. 2015 Wisconsin Act 96

  33. Nov 11, 2015 · Assembly

    Published 11-12-2015