Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: animals believed to have been involved in crimes against animals, when a stray or abandoned animal may be considered unclaimed, and a court order relating to an animal taken into or held in custody. (FE)
Animal — Treatment Court — Procedure Municipality
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to the treatment of animals that are believed
to have been used in crimes against animals.
Under current law, a humane officer or law enforcement officer, on behalf of a
city, village, town, or county (local governmental unit), may take custody of an animal
if the officer believes the animal meets certain conditions, including if the animal has
been a participant in an animal fight intentionally instigated by any person or has
been criminally mistreated. This bill allows such an officer to take custody of an
animal if the officer believes the animal has been involved in any of a number of
crimes related to the treatment of animals (crimes against animals).
Under current law, a local governmental unit may withhold, or direct a person
contracting with it to withhold, an animal in custody from an owner who makes an
otherwise adequate claim for the animal on certain grounds, including if there are
reasonable grounds to believe that the owner has criminally mistreated the animal.
Under this bill, an animal may be withheld from an owner if there are reasonable
grounds to believe that the owner has used the animal in any crime against animals.
Under current law, if the owner of an animal that is being held in custody (by
a local governmental unit or other person, such as a humane society, on behalf of a
local governmental unit) is convicted of a crime related to animal fighting and the
animal is one year old or older or shows indication of having participated in fighting,
the animal must be euthanized.
Also under current law, an animal that is taken into custody for certain reasons
may be considered an unclaimed animal, including if the animal is abandoned or a
stray, if it is an untagged dog, if it is not licensed, or if its owner fails to pick it up from
a veterinarian. If an animal is considered unclaimed, the person with custody of the
animal has a number of options regarding treatment of the animal. These options
include releasing the animal to a person other than the owner under certain
circumstances, selling an animal other than a dog or cat at public auction,
euthanizing the animal, or, if the animal is a stray, releasing the animal for scientific
or educational purposes.
Under this bill, if an animal of any age is being held in custody and the owner
of the animal is convicted of a crime against an animal, the animal must be treated
as an unclaimed animal.
Under current law, if an animal has been taken into custody because it is
believed that the animal has been used in, or is evidence of, a crime related to animal
fighting, it must be retained in custody. If the owner claims the right of possession
of the animal, a court must determine whether the animal is needed as evidence or
there is reason to believe that the animal has been used in fighting. If so, the animal
must be retained in custody.
Under this bill, if an animal has been taken into custody because it is believed
that the animal has been used in any crime against animals or that it constitutes
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 0
Passed 13–0 Jan 26, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 0
Passed 13–0 Jan 26, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 9, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Spiros, Bowen, Rohrkaste, Gannon, Jagler, Milroy, A. Ott, Subeck, Kleefisch, Sinicki, Johnson, Allen, Goyke, Ohnstad, R. Brooks, Bernier, Weatherston, C. Taylor, Zamarripa and Brostoff; cosponsored by Senator Petrowski
- Nov 9, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety
- Dec 8, 2015 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Spiros
- Dec 18, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
- Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 14, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 28, 2016 · Assembly
Representative Milroy withdrawn as a coauthor
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 15, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Spiros
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representatives Spreitzer, Genrich, Hebl, C. Taylor, Wachs and Jorgensen
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Representative Riemer added as a coauthor
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1