Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: lines transporting manure within highway rights-of-way and providing a penalty. (FE)
Fertilizer Road Street Transportation, department of — Roads
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill specifies the process for authorizing pipelines or hoses transmitting
liquid manure within or across a highway right-of-way.
Under current law, no person may excavate, fill, install a culvert in, or
otherwise alter or disturb any highway without a permit (often referred to as a
driveway permit) from the authority maintaining the highway (highway authority).
Current law also requires written consent (often referred to as a utility permit) of the
highway authority before utility lines or pipes, including water pipes, are
constructed within or across the limits of a highway.
Also under current law, upon application, if certain conditions are satisfied, the
governing body of a municipality may grant a "privilege" to place an obstruction or
excavation within a highway in a municipality. A privilege is not required to be
granted for an obstruction or excavation that is in place for less than 90 days and for
which a permit has been granted.
Under this bill, a utility permit, issued by the applicable highway authority, is
required to construct a subterranean pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure
within or across a highway right-of-way. A utility permit, issued by the Department
of Transportation, is also required if the pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure
is not subterranean but crosses or lies within the right-of-way of a state trunk
highway. A utility permit may be obtained, but is not required, for a pipe or pipeline
transmitting liquid manure that is not subterranean and does not cross or lie within
the right-of-way of a state trunk highway; however, if a utility permit is not
obtained, a driveway permit from the local highway authority is required.
Under this bill, for purposes of a driveway permit, a manure hose is defined as
a hose, pipeline, or other conduit, whether temporary or permanent, for the
transmission of liquid manure within or across a highway right-of-way to a
destination for spreading in a farm field or for storage. The bill specifies that a
driveway permit authorizing the permittee to lay out or install any manure hose
within or across a highway right-of-way may also authorize the permittee to
temporarily affix to a bridge under the jurisdiction of the highway authority hooks,
flanges, fasteners, or other devices to or by which a manure hose may be attached or
supported. The highway authority may require the driveway permit applicant to
submit, for approval, a plan specifying how the manure hose would be attached to
or supported by the bridge. The driveway permit may impose reasonable conditions
related to the authorization provided under the permit.
The bill also clarifies that, if a utility permit is issued for a pipe or pipeline
transmitting liquid manure, a driveway permit is not required and, if either a utility
permit or driveway permit is issued, a privilege granted by a municipality is not
required. The bill further specifies that a driveway permit may not be issued for a
subterranean pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure within or across a
highway right-of-way or for a pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure within
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 1
Passed 13–1 Feb 4, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 2
Passed 13–2 Feb 4, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Edming, Tranel, Allen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Czaja, Jacque, Jarchow, Kitchens, Kremer, Krug, Kulp, T. Larson, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Nerison, A. Ott, Petryk, Quinn, Ripp and Tittl; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Gudex, Harsdorf, Lassa, Marklein, Moulton, Stroebel and Vinehout
- Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation
- Dec 3, 2015 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Edming
- Dec 8, 2015 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 20, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 2
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1