Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 563

Authorizing towns located in populous counties to withdraw from county zoning; requiring certain towns to enact a zoning ordinance and a comprehensive plan; removing plat and certified survey map approval authority from a county if the town in which the subdivision or land is located has withdrawn from county zoning; farmland preservation ordinances of towns that withdraw from county zoning and eligibility in those towns for the farmland preservation tax credit; and prohibiting restrictions on land that is not shoreland or that is not within a floodplain. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 1, 2016. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 4, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 9, 2016

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 19 to 13

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 178

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 1, 2016: “Published 3-1-2016”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if a town board has been granted the authority to exercise village powers, the town board may enact zoning ordinances using the zoning statutes that are used by cities and villages, subject to a number of conditions. If the county in which the town is located has enacted a county zoning ordinance, town zoning ordinances may not take effect until such ordinances are approved either by a town meeting or by a referendum vote of the electors of the town and are approved by the county board. In addition, in counties having a zoning ordinance, no town zoning ordinance, or amendment of a zoning ordinance, may be adopted by the town unless approved by the county board; the bill repeals this provision, except as it applies to Waukesha County.

Also under current law, a county zoning ordinance may not take effect in a town unless it has been approved by the town board. Once a town board has approved a county zoning ordinance, the town may not withdraw its approval.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, a town board that is located in a county with a population of at least 485,000 may enact an ordinance withdrawing from coverage of a county zoning ordinance and a county development plan. A town board may enact the ordinance during 2017, or during the one-year period every three years after January 1, 2017.

Such an ordinance may not take effect unless the town notifies the county clerk and one or more officials of the other towns in the county of the proposed ordinance and the town enacts, and sends copies to the county clerk, a town zoning ordinance, a comprehensive plan, and an official map. The zoning ordinance that the town must enact must be either essentially identical to the county zoning ordinance that is in effect when the town begins its efforts to withdraw from county zoning, or it must be a model ordinance that is developed and recommended by a group of towns in a county that have all begun an effort to withdraw from county zoning. In addition, the ordinance must preserve nonconforming uses. A town that enacts an ordinance based on the county ordinance may amend it, and the model ordinance may be amended by a vote of the majority of the towns that have enacted the model ordinance. With regard to the type of zoning ordinance that applies in a town, the town may switch back and forth between having the ordinance that is essentially identical to the county zoning ordinance apply and having the model ordinance apply. County board approval of a town zoning ordinance is not required if the town has withdrawn from county zoning.

If a county clerk receives notice from a town before July 1 that the town intends to withdraw from county zoning, the bill authorizes a county board to enact an ordinance, before October 1, to repeal all of its zoning ordinances, other than shoreland and floodplain zoning ordinances. The county must notify all of the towns that are subject to its zoning ordinances that it intends to enact an ordinance to repeal those ordinances. The county ordinance to repeal its zoning ordinances must have a delayed effective date of one year. If a town is so notified, it must enact a zoning ordinance, comprehensive plan, and official map to take effect on the effective date of the county's repeal of its zoning ordinance.

Under current law, one of the eligibility requirements for the farmland preservation tax credit is that the claimant's farmland is either covered by a farmland preservation agreement or is in a farmland preservation zoning district under a farmland preservation zoning ordinance certified by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP). This bill provides that if a town that withdraws from county zoning adopts a farmland preservation zoning ordinance before it withdraws, the town's farmland preservation zoning ordinance is considered to be certified by DATCP until DATCP certifies, or denies certification of, the ordinance, but not for more than 18 months.

Current law specifies whether a city, village, town, or county has the right to approve or object to a plat (the map of a subdivision) or certified survey map.

Generally, the location of the subdivision or land determines which local governmental unit or units have the right to approve the plat or certified survey map.

The bill provides that if a subdivision or land is located in a town that has enacted an ordinance withdrawing from coverage of a county zoning ordinance, the county in which the subdivision or land is located has no authority to approve or object to a plat relating to the subdivision or to a certified survey map relating to the land, but may object to any portion of the subdivision or land that is shoreland, or that is in a 100-year floodplain, in the county.

Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for all shorelands in its unincorporated area. Current law defines a shoreland to be an area within a specified distance from the edge of a navigable water. Current law also requires a county, city, or village to adopt floodplain zoning ordinances within one year after certain hydraulic and engineering data becomes available. If no ordinance is adopted, the Department of Natural Resources, upon its own petition or upon the petition of an interested state agency or municipality, must adopt a floodplain zoning ordinance applicable to the county, city, or village.

This bill specifies that the law that requires a county to enact a shoreland zoning ordinance does not authorize the county to impose a requirement, condition, or restriction on land that is not shoreland within the county. The bill also provides that the law requiring a county to adopt a floodplain zoning ordinance does not authorize a county to impose a requirement, condition, or restriction on land that is not within any floodplain in the county.

Who's behind it

11 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 11 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 14 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 2 · Feb 3, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 2 · Feb 3, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 3, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 62 to 35 · Feb 9, 2016

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (62)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 35, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 15, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 19 to 13 · Feb 16, 2016 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 19, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 1, 2016

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 1, 2016

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 178.

  3. Feb 25, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2016

    The Senate passed it too, 19 to 13.

  5. Feb 15, 2016

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 15, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Feb 11, 2016

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  8. Feb 10, 2016

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly passed it, 62 to 35.

  10. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Feb 3, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 3, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.

  13. Jan 4, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Dec 23, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Dec 10, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Dec 4, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate.

  17. Dec 4, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 4, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Ripp, Kleefisch, Jagler, Ballweg, Duchow, Hutton, Jacque, Jarchow, T. Larson, Sanfelippo and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators S. Fitzgerald, Olsen and Nass

  2. Dec 4, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate

  3. Dec 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Dec 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Ripp

  6. Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 14, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Ripp

  9. Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Allen

  10. Jan 20, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Allen

  11. Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representative Allen

  13. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  14. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  15. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  16. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  17. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 by Committee on Rules

  18. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  19. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  20. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 adopted

  21. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 adopted

  22. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 35, Paired 2

  25. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  27. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  28. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  29. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  30. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  31. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  32. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  33. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  34. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  35. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 19, Noes 13

  36. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  37. Feb 17, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  38. Feb 25, 2016 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-25-2016

  39. Feb 25, 2016 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 2-25-2016

  40. Mar 1, 2016 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 2-29-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 178

  41. Mar 1, 2016 · Assembly

    Published 3-1-2016

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote