Assembly Bill 582
Government actions affecting rights to real property; the regulation of shoreland zoning; the substitution of hearing examiners in contested cases; and the property tax treatment of unoccupied property. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 26, 2016. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 7, 2015
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 9, 2016
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 16, 2016
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2015 Wisconsin Act 391
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 26, 2016: “Published 4-27-2016”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Introduction This bill makes various changes to the regulation of property rights and shoreland zoning and allows for the substitution of hearing examiners in contested case hearings.
property rights Procedural protections Restrictions on sale, purchase, development, or occupancy of real property This bill does all of the following:
Read the full summary Show less
1. Prohibits a local governmental unit from requiring a person to take certain actions with respect to real property, or pay a related fee, before purchasing, taking title to, or occupying the property.
2. Provides that a local governmental unit may require a real property owner to take certain actions with respect to property that are not related to purchasing or occupying the property.
3. Invalidates any ordinance, resolution, or policy currently in effect that is inconsistent with the prohibitions in the bill.
4. Provides that the prohibitions in the bill, and related prohibitions under current law, do not affect the ability of a local governmental unit to enforce any state or federal requirement.
5. Specifically prohibits a county from enacting a development moratorium.
6. Prohibits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) from prohibiting or unreasonably restricting a real property owner from selling or transferring title to any interest in the real property.
Individual notice requirements This bill requires a political subdivision to provide written notice to a landowner that potential action by the political subdivision may affect the allowable use of the landowner's property. The bill also requires counties and towns to provide such notice if a proposed zoning ordinance will affect the size or density requirements of a landowner's property. In addition, the bill eliminates a political subdivision's authority under current law to impose a fee for providing notice.
Vested rights This bill requires a political subdivision to deny or approve a permit for activity related to a specific and identifiable land development based on regulations and ordinances in effect at the time that the permit application was submitted for approval. Also, if a project requires an approval from a state agency and a political subdivision, the existing requirements applicable at the time of filing the first application, whether filed with the state agency or political subdivision, are applicable to all subsequent approvals required for the project. The bill also provides that any deadline set by the political subdivision for approving a permit application must be extended so that it coincides with the period in which other related applications are being decided on, including the duration of any proceedings contesting the approval of such applications.
Shoreland zoning Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for all shorelands in its unincorporated area and the ordinance must meet shoreland zoning standards established by DNR by rule. Current law defines shorelands to be the area within a certain distance from the OHWM of a navigable water. Current law requires a county to establish a shoreland setback area, which is an area within a certain distance of the OHWM in which the construction or placement of structures is limited or prohibited. Under this bill, if a professional land surveyor, in measuring a setback from an OHWM of a navigable water, relies on a map, plat, or survey that incorporates or approximates the OHWM, the setback measured is the setback with respect to a structure constructed on that property if the map, plat, or survey relied upon is prepared by a professional land surveyor and DNR has not identified the OHWM on its Internet site at the time the setback is measured.
Current law generally prohibits the enactment of a county shoreland zoning ordinance that prohibits or regulates the maintenance, repair, replacement, restoration, rebuilding, or remodeling of all or any part of a nonconforming structure if that activity does not expand the structure's footprint, and a county shoreland zoning ordinance that requires any approval or imposes any fee or mitigation requirement for, or otherwise prohibits or regulates, the vertical expansion of a nonconforming structure. This bill expands these prohibitions to a structure of which any part is legally located in the shoreland setback area only by operation of a variance.
Under the bill, neither DNR nor a county shoreland zoning ordinance may prohibit the owner of a boathouse with a flat roof from using the roof as a deck if the roof has no side walls or screens or from having or installing a railing around the roof that is consistent with Department of Safety and Professional Services standards.
This bill provides that a shoreland zoning standard or ordinance may not prohibit placement of a device or system that retains runoff in a shoreland setback area.
The bill also provides that the construction or maintenance of property or equipment used for the transmission, delivery, or furnishing of natural gas, heat, light, or power and owned by a public utility or cooperative association organized for the purpose of producing or furnishing heat, light, or power to its members only is considered to satisfy shoreland zoning laws and a county's shoreland zoning ordinance if DNR has issued all required navigable water, water and sewage, and pollution discharge permits or approvals authorizing the construction or maintenance or, if no such permits or approvals are required, if the construction and maintenance is conducted in a manner that employs best management practices to infiltrate or otherwise control storm water runoff from that infrastructure.
Resolution of challenge to zoning restrictions This bill requires a court to resolve any ambiguity in a matter involving a zoning ordinance or shoreland zoning ordinance in favor of the free use of private property.
Supermajority vote to down zone a property The bill allows a political subdivision to enact a down zoning ordinance only if the ordinance is approved by at least two-thirds of the members of its governing body. The bill defines a down zoning ordinance as an ordinance that affects an area of land by rezoning it to a usage that is less dense than its previous usage.
Property tax treatment of undeveloped land This bill defines, for property tax purposes, "undeveloped land" to include land that is platted and zoned for residential, commercial, or manufacturing use until such time that a permit is issued for constructing a building or other structure on the land. The bill provides that such land be assessed at its unimproved value. Other undeveloped land under current law is assessed at 50 percent of its full value.
Contested case hearings Under this bill, a person who has applied for a contract, permit, or other approval that is the subject of a contested case hearing for which the Division of Hearings and Appeals in the Department of Administration has assigned a hearing examiner may file one written request per hearing for a substitution of a new hearing examiner. If the request is timely and in proper form, the matter must be transferred to a new hearing examiner.
Who's behind it
8 lawmakers are its . All 8 are Republicans.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 13 names Hide the names
Authors (8)
- Scott Allen · Republican, Assembly
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- Adam Jarchow · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (5)
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Devin LeMahieu · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 8 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 26, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 2 · Jan 26, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 63 to 34 · Feb 9, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 63 to 34 · Feb 9, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 56 to 39 · Feb 9, 2016 · 2 didn't vote
See how each of the 97 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (56)
- Adam Jarchow (R, 28)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bob Kulp (R, 69)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Cody Horlacher (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- David Heaton (R, 85)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- James Edming (R, 87)
- Janel Brandtjen (R, 22)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Sanfelippo (R, 15)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- John Macco (R, 88)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Mary Czaja (R, 35)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Mike Rohrkaste (R, 55)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Terry Katsma (R, 26)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Weatherston (R, 62)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Tyler Vorpagel (R, 27)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (39)
- Amanda Stuck (D, 57)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Beth Meyers (D, 74)
- Bob Gannon (R, 58)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Dave Considine (D, 81)
- David Bowen (D, 10)
- Debra Kolste (D, 44)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Eric Genrich (D, 90)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Jesse Kremer (R, 59)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Jonathan Brostoff (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Mandela Barnes (D, 11)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Melissa Sargent (D, 48)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
Didn't vote (2)
- Dana Wachs (D, 91)
- Ken Skowronski (R, 82)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 56, Noes 39, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 15, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 19 to 13 · Feb 16, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 19 to 13 · Feb 16, 2016 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (19)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Richard Gudex (R, 18)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (13)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Didn't vote (1)
- Nikiya Harris Dodd (D, 6)
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 19, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 26, 2016
The new law was published.
-
Apr 26, 2016
The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 391.
-
Apr 21, 2016
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 24, 2016
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 18, 2016
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Feb 16, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 16, 2016
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 16, 2016
The Senate passed it too, 19 to 13.
-
Feb 16, 2016
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 15, 2016
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Feb 11, 2016
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 10, 2016
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 9, 2016
The Assembly passed it, 56 to 39.
-
Feb 9, 2016
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 4, 2016
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 26, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 26, 2016
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.
-
Jan 7, 2016
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 7, 2016
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jan 4, 2016
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 17, 2015
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Dec 7, 2015
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate.
-
Dec 7, 2015
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 7, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jarchow, Allen, Craig, Czaja, Knodl, Nygren, Petersen and Tauchen; cosponsored by Senators Lasee, LeMahieu and Nass
- Dec 7, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate
- Dec 17, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Schraa added as a coauthor
- Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jarchow
- Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly
Representative R. Brooks added as a coauthor
- Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Jarchow
- Jan 21, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 5, Noes 2
- Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 8, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Jarchow
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Young
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Young
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 56, Noes 39, Paired 2
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 10, 2016 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 11, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 11, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 15, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 15, 2016 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Vinehout, Miller and Risser
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 13
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 19, Noes 13
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Read and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 1:21 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Senate Amendment 1 concurred in
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 24, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 29, 2016 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 2-29-2016
- Apr 21, 2016 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-21-2016
- Apr 26, 2016 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-26-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 391
- Apr 26, 2016 · Assembly
Published 4-27-2016
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote