Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 582

Government actions affecting rights to real property; the regulation of shoreland zoning; the substitution of hearing examiners in contested cases; and the property tax treatment of unoccupied property. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 26, 2016. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 7, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 9, 2016

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2016

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 391

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 26, 2016: “Published 4-27-2016”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Introduction This bill makes various changes to the regulation of property rights and shoreland zoning and allows for the substitution of hearing examiners in contested case hearings.

property rights Procedural protections Restrictions on sale, purchase, development, or occupancy of real property This bill does all of the following:

Read the full summary

1. Prohibits a local governmental unit from requiring a person to take certain actions with respect to real property, or pay a related fee, before purchasing, taking title to, or occupying the property.

2. Provides that a local governmental unit may require a real property owner to take certain actions with respect to property that are not related to purchasing or occupying the property.

3. Invalidates any ordinance, resolution, or policy currently in effect that is inconsistent with the prohibitions in the bill.

4. Provides that the prohibitions in the bill, and related prohibitions under current law, do not affect the ability of a local governmental unit to enforce any state or federal requirement.

5. Specifically prohibits a county from enacting a development moratorium.

6. Prohibits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) from prohibiting or unreasonably restricting a real property owner from selling or transferring title to any interest in the real property.

Individual notice requirements This bill requires a political subdivision to provide written notice to a landowner that potential action by the political subdivision may affect the allowable use of the landowner's property. The bill also requires counties and towns to provide such notice if a proposed zoning ordinance will affect the size or density requirements of a landowner's property. In addition, the bill eliminates a political subdivision's authority under current law to impose a fee for providing notice.

Vested rights This bill requires a political subdivision to deny or approve a permit for activity related to a specific and identifiable land development based on regulations and ordinances in effect at the time that the permit application was submitted for approval. Also, if a project requires an approval from a state agency and a political subdivision, the existing requirements applicable at the time of filing the first application, whether filed with the state agency or political subdivision, are applicable to all subsequent approvals required for the project. The bill also provides that any deadline set by the political subdivision for approving a permit application must be extended so that it coincides with the period in which other related applications are being decided on, including the duration of any proceedings contesting the approval of such applications.

Shoreland zoning Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for all shorelands in its unincorporated area and the ordinance must meet shoreland zoning standards established by DNR by rule. Current law defines shorelands to be the area within a certain distance from the OHWM of a navigable water. Current law requires a county to establish a shoreland setback area, which is an area within a certain distance of the OHWM in which the construction or placement of structures is limited or prohibited. Under this bill, if a professional land surveyor, in measuring a setback from an OHWM of a navigable water, relies on a map, plat, or survey that incorporates or approximates the OHWM, the setback measured is the setback with respect to a structure constructed on that property if the map, plat, or survey relied upon is prepared by a professional land surveyor and DNR has not identified the OHWM on its Internet site at the time the setback is measured.

Current law generally prohibits the enactment of a county shoreland zoning ordinance that prohibits or regulates the maintenance, repair, replacement, restoration, rebuilding, or remodeling of all or any part of a nonconforming structure if that activity does not expand the structure's footprint, and a county shoreland zoning ordinance that requires any approval or imposes any fee or mitigation requirement for, or otherwise prohibits or regulates, the vertical expansion of a nonconforming structure. This bill expands these prohibitions to a structure of which any part is legally located in the shoreland setback area only by operation of a variance.

Under the bill, neither DNR nor a county shoreland zoning ordinance may prohibit the owner of a boathouse with a flat roof from using the roof as a deck if the roof has no side walls or screens or from having or installing a railing around the roof that is consistent with Department of Safety and Professional Services standards.

This bill provides that a shoreland zoning standard or ordinance may not prohibit placement of a device or system that retains runoff in a shoreland setback area.

The bill also provides that the construction or maintenance of property or equipment used for the transmission, delivery, or furnishing of natural gas, heat, light, or power and owned by a public utility or cooperative association organized for the purpose of producing or furnishing heat, light, or power to its members only is considered to satisfy shoreland zoning laws and a county's shoreland zoning ordinance if DNR has issued all required navigable water, water and sewage, and pollution discharge permits or approvals authorizing the construction or maintenance or, if no such permits or approvals are required, if the construction and maintenance is conducted in a manner that employs best management practices to infiltrate or otherwise control storm water runoff from that infrastructure.

Resolution of challenge to zoning restrictions This bill requires a court to resolve any ambiguity in a matter involving a zoning ordinance or shoreland zoning ordinance in favor of the free use of private property.

Supermajority vote to down zone a property The bill allows a political subdivision to enact a down zoning ordinance only if the ordinance is approved by at least two-thirds of the members of its governing body. The bill defines a down zoning ordinance as an ordinance that affects an area of land by rezoning it to a usage that is less dense than its previous usage.

Property tax treatment of undeveloped land This bill defines, for property tax purposes, "undeveloped land" to include land that is platted and zoned for residential, commercial, or manufacturing use until such time that a permit is issued for constructing a building or other structure on the land. The bill provides that such land be assessed at its unimproved value. Other undeveloped land under current law is assessed at 50 percent of its full value.

Contested case hearings Under this bill, a person who has applied for a contract, permit, or other approval that is the subject of a contested case hearing for which the Division of Hearings and Appeals in the Department of Administration has assigned a hearing examiner may file one written request per hearing for a substitution of a new hearing examiner. If the request is timely and in proper form, the matter must be transferred to a new hearing examiner.

Who's behind it

8 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 8 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 13 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 8 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 26, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Jan 26, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 63 to 34 · Feb 9, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 63 to 34 · Feb 9, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 56 to 39 · Feb 9, 2016 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (56)

No (39)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 56, Noes 39, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 15, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 19 to 13 · Feb 16, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 19 to 13 · Feb 16, 2016 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 19, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 26, 2016

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 26, 2016

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 391.

  3. Apr 21, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 24, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Feb 18, 2016

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 16, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 16, 2016

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Feb 16, 2016

    The Senate passed it too, 19 to 13.

  9. Feb 16, 2016

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Feb 15, 2016

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 11, 2016

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  12. Feb 10, 2016

    The Senate received it.

  13. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly passed it, 56 to 39.

  14. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly adopted it.

  15. Feb 4, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jan 26, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  17. Jan 26, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  18. Jan 7, 2016

    The committee held a public hearing.

  19. Jan 7, 2016

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  20. Jan 4, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  21. Dec 17, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  22. Dec 7, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate.

  23. Dec 7, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jarchow, Allen, Craig, Czaja, Knodl, Nygren, Petersen and Tauchen; cosponsored by Senators Lasee, LeMahieu and Nass

  2. Dec 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate

  3. Dec 17, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Schraa added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jarchow

  6. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Representative R. Brooks added as a coauthor

  7. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Jarchow

  9. Jan 21, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  11. Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  12. Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 by Committee on Rules

  15. Feb 8, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Jarchow

  16. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  18. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Young

  19. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34

  20. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Young

  21. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34

  22. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  23. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 56, Noes 39, Paired 2

  26. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  28. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  29. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  30. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  31. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  32. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee

  33. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Vinehout, Miller and Risser

  34. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  35. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  36. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 13

  37. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  38. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  39. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 19, Noes 13

  40. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  41. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)

  42. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read and referred to committee on Rules

  43. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:21 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  44. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Senate Amendment 1 concurred in

  45. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  46. Feb 24, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  47. Feb 29, 2016 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-29-2016

  48. Apr 21, 2016 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-21-2016

  49. Apr 26, 2016 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-26-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 391

  50. Apr 26, 2016 · Assembly

    Published 4-27-2016

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote