Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 597

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: alcohol and other drug assessments in counties and correctional institutions and making an appropriation. (FE)

Alcohol and other drug abuse Corrections, department of County — Human services Health services, department of — Supportive living and treatment Indians and tribal issues Jail Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Prison

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill allows persons who are inmates in a correctional facility to obtain

certain alcohol and other drug assessments at a treatment center operated by the

Department of Corrections (DOC). Under current law, a person who is convicted of

certain offenses related to operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant

(OWI-related offense) is generally required to submit to and comply with an

assessment by an approved public treatment facility for examination of the person's

use of alcohol, controlled substances, or controlled substance analogs and for

development of a driver safety plan for the person. Approved public treatment

facilities are facilities that meet standards established by the Department of Health

Services (DHS).

Under the bill, DOC may establish and operate a treatment facility for the

purposes of providing court-ordered assessments and developing driver safety plans

for persons who are inmates of a correctional facility. The bill requires DOC to

comply with the standards and rules established by DHS for treatment facilities and

to obtain DHS approval of the treatment facility. The bill also requires a county,

tribal, or DOC treatment facility to accept and enforce compliance with a driver

safety plan that is established by another county, tribal, or DOC treatment facility.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Hutton (R) , Krug (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)

1 cosponsors

Darling (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Corrections, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Feb 5, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krug, Hutton, E. Brooks, Thiesfeldt, Murtha, Mursau and Ballweg; cosponsored by Senator Darling

  2. Dec 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Corrections

  3. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 14, 2016 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 20, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Corrections, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  8. Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1