Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: individual and corporate income and franchise taxes; sales and use taxes; administration of tax laws; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)
Corporation — Taxation Franchise — Taxation Income tax Income tax — Credit Revenue, department of Sales tax Taxation
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to Wisconsin tax law related to individual and
corporate income and franchise taxes, sales and use taxes, and the administration
of tax laws.
Under current law, the Department of Revenue (DOR) may impose certain
penalties if a taxpayer fails to produce records and documents requested by DOR to
substantiate amounts or other information required to be shown on a tax return.
This bill provides that those penalties may not be imposed until after DOR has issued
a summons seeking the records and documents, and the taxpayer has failed to
comply with the summons.
Under current law, if a taxpayer engages in a transaction without economic
substance to create a loss, to reduce taxable income, or to increase credits allowed in
determining Wisconsin tax, DOR may disregard the transaction for purposes of
calculating the taxpayer's tax liability. This bill eliminates the factors under current
law that determine whether a transaction has economic substance and replaces
those factors with the factors set forth in federal law.
Under current law, a person may claim an income or franchise tax credit based
on the person's qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing
or agriculture in this state. Qualified production activities income includes certain
direct costs and indirect costs, which are defined to include ordinary and necessary
expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or business that are deductible
under the Internal Revenue Code. This bill changes the definitions of direct costs
and indirect costs to also include a reasonable allowance for the exhaustion and wear
and tear (including a reasonable allowance for obsolescence) of property that is
deductible as depreciation under the Internal Revenue Code.
For income tax purposes, current law provides that any income of a nonresident
individual, estate, or trust may be taxed by the state in which the business, property,
or service from which the income is derived is located. This bill requires DOR to
promulgate rules establishing the criteria to be used in determining whether a
business, property, or service is located in this state for income and franchise tax
purposes. The bill also prohibits DOR from relying on any factors not set forth in the
rules when making the determination.
Under current law, DOR may tax the income of a taxpayer if the taxpayer is
subject to the jurisdiction of this state, and DOR only taxes so much of the taxpayer's
income that is allocated or apportioned to this state under a set of rules set forth in
current law. Current law also provides that, if certain income of a taxpayer is not
taxable by another state because the taxpayer is not subject to the jurisdiction of that
state, DOR may tax that income under the state's throwback law. This bill requires
DOR to promulgate rules establishing the criteria to be used in determining whether
a taxpayer is subject to the jurisdiction of this state or any other state for income and
franchise tax purposes. The bill also prohibits DOR from relying on any factors not
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report of joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 6, Noes 3
Passed 6–3 Feb 1, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 5
Passed 8–5 Feb 5, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 5
Passed 8–5 Feb 5, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 29, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Macco, Kooyenga, Katsma, Jarchow, Novak, Tauchen, Duchow, Knodl, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Jacque and Murphy; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Gudex and Roth
- Dec 29, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means
- Jan 6, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (1)(b)
- Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly
Public hearing held by committee on Ways and Means
- Jan 20, 2016 · Assembly
Representative Kulp added as a coauthor
- Jan 26, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Macco
- Jan 27, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken by joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions
- Feb 1, 2016 · Assembly
Report of joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 6, Noes 3
- Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Riemer
- Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken by committee on Ways and Means
- Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 5
- Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 5
- Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Macco
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 1:23 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives C. Taylor and Barca
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1