Assembly Bill 628
Suspending, revoking, or refusing to renew cigarette and tobacco products retailer licenses. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 22, 2016. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 4, 2016
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 11, 2016
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 16, 2016
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2015 Wisconsin Act 275
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 22, 2016: “Published 3-23-2016”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill allows a municipality that has issued a cigarette or tobacco products retailer license to suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the license under certain circumstances, and establishes a procedure for doing so.
Under current law, local municipalities issue licenses to retailers to sell cigarettes or tobacco products. Current law provides that a license is valid for one year unless sooner revoked. Under current law, a retailer's license is terminated upon conviction of its second or subsequent violation of selling cigarettes or tobacco products without a license, if the retailer is found guilty of failing to exercise due care.
Read the full summary Show less
Current law also provides that a court must suspend a retailer's license if the court finds the retailer guilty of two or more violations of certain restrictions relating to sales to minors within a 12-month period.
This bill allows a municipality to suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a cigarette and tobacco products retailer license if the retailer does any of the following: 1) violates certain restrictions relating to the sale of cigarettes and tobacco; 2) keeps premises that are disorderly, riotous, indecent, or improper; 3) has failed to maintain the premises according to sanitation standards; 4) has permitted known criminals or prostitutes to loiter on the premises; 5) has been convicted of manufacturing, distributing, or delivering, or possessing with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, a controlled substance; or 6) knowingly allows another person on the licensed premises to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, or possess with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, a controlled substance.
Under the bill, a resident or authorized employee of the municipality that issued the retailer license may file a sworn complaint with the municipal clerk, alleging one of these grounds for suspension, revocation, or nonrenewal. The person holding the retailer license is then entitled to a hearing before the municipal governing body. The municipal governing body must find the allegations of the complaint to be true and find that there are sufficient grounds for suspension, revocation, or nonrenewal before suspending, revoking, or refusing to renew the license. If a retailer's license is revoked following a hearing, the retailer may not obtain another such license for 12 months. The municipal governing body's decision to suspend, revoke, or not renew a license, or its decision not to act, may be reviewed by the circuit court for the county in which the license was issued.
Under current law, it is a defense to any prosecution for selling cigarettes or tobacco products to a minor if the retailer can show that the purchaser falsely represented that he or she was at least 18 years of age, presented an identification card, and appeared to be at least 18, and that the sale was made in good faith. The bill provides that this is also a defense to a complaint, made under the procedures described in this bill, that alleges the retailer sold cigarettes or tobacco products to a minor.
Who's behind it
17 lawmakers are its . 12 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.
8 more lawmakers .
See all 25 names Hide the names
Authors (17)
- Mandela Barnes · Democrat, Assembly
- David Bowen · Democrat, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Evan Goyke · Democrat, Assembly
- Jim Ott · Republican, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Robb Kahl · Democrat, Assembly
- John Macco · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Daniel Riemer · Democrat, Assembly
- Jessie Rodriguez · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Dana Wachs · Democrat, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (8)
- Scott Allen · Republican, Assembly
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Gannon and Swearingen
- Eric Genrich · Democrat, Assembly
- Nikiya Harris Dodd · Democrat, Senate
- Rob Hutton · Republican, Senate
- Chris Kapenga · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment
Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 5, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 1 · Feb 5, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 15, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 22, 2016
The new law was published.
-
Mar 22, 2016
The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 275.
-
Mar 21, 2016
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 16, 2016
The Senate passed it too.
-
Feb 15, 2016
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Feb 12, 2016
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 11, 2016
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 11, 2016
The Assembly passed it.
-
Feb 11, 2016
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 5, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 5, 2016
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.
-
Jan 7, 2016 to Jan 13, 2016
3 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Jan 7, 2016
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 7, 2016
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 5, 2016 to Jan 6, 2016
2 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Jan 4, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.
-
Jan 4, 2016
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Goyke, J. Ott, Jacque, Skowronski, Macco, Rodriguez, Zepnick, Brostoff, Sinicki, Johnson, Kahl, Ohnstad, Riemer, Wachs, Barnes, Bowen and Young; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Harris Dodd, Carpenter and Kapenga
- Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jan 5, 2016 · Assembly
Representative Hutton added as a coauthor
- Jan 6, 2016 · Assembly
Representative Allen added as a coauthor
- Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly
Representatives Gannon and Swearingen added as coauthors
- Jan 8, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Goyke and J. Ott
- Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly
Representative Genrich added as a coauthor
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-11-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kerkman
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 11, 2016 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 12, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 12, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 15, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 15, 2016 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 16, 2016 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 17, 2016 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Feb 25, 2016 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 2-25-2016
- Mar 21, 2016 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-21-2016
- Mar 22, 2016 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 3-22-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 275
- Mar 22, 2016 · Assembly
Published 3-23-2016
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote