Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 628

Suspending, revoking, or refusing to renew cigarette and tobacco products retailer licenses. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 22, 2016. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 4, 2016

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 11, 2016

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2016

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 275

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 22, 2016: “Published 3-23-2016”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows a municipality that has issued a cigarette or tobacco products retailer license to suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the license under certain circumstances, and establishes a procedure for doing so.

Under current law, local municipalities issue licenses to retailers to sell cigarettes or tobacco products. Current law provides that a license is valid for one year unless sooner revoked. Under current law, a retailer's license is terminated upon conviction of its second or subsequent violation of selling cigarettes or tobacco products without a license, if the retailer is found guilty of failing to exercise due care.

Read the full summary

Current law also provides that a court must suspend a retailer's license if the court finds the retailer guilty of two or more violations of certain restrictions relating to sales to minors within a 12-month period.

This bill allows a municipality to suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a cigarette and tobacco products retailer license if the retailer does any of the following: 1) violates certain restrictions relating to the sale of cigarettes and tobacco; 2) keeps premises that are disorderly, riotous, indecent, or improper; 3) has failed to maintain the premises according to sanitation standards; 4) has permitted known criminals or prostitutes to loiter on the premises; 5) has been convicted of manufacturing, distributing, or delivering, or possessing with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, a controlled substance; or 6) knowingly allows another person on the licensed premises to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, or possess with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, a controlled substance.

Under the bill, a resident or authorized employee of the municipality that issued the retailer license may file a sworn complaint with the municipal clerk, alleging one of these grounds for suspension, revocation, or nonrenewal. The person holding the retailer license is then entitled to a hearing before the municipal governing body. The municipal governing body must find the allegations of the complaint to be true and find that there are sufficient grounds for suspension, revocation, or nonrenewal before suspending, revoking, or refusing to renew the license. If a retailer's license is revoked following a hearing, the retailer may not obtain another such license for 12 months. The municipal governing body's decision to suspend, revoke, or not renew a license, or its decision not to act, may be reviewed by the circuit court for the county in which the license was issued.

Under current law, it is a defense to any prosecution for selling cigarettes or tobacco products to a minor if the retailer can show that the purchaser falsely represented that he or she was at least 18 years of age, presented an identification card, and appeared to be at least 18, and that the sale was made in good faith. The bill provides that this is also a defense to a complaint, made under the procedures described in this bill, that alleges the retailer sold cigarettes or tobacco products to a minor.

Who's behind it

17 lawmakers are its ⁠. 12 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (17)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 5, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 1 · Feb 5, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 15, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 22, 2016

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 22, 2016

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 275.

  3. Mar 21, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2016

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Feb 15, 2016

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 12, 2016

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Feb 11, 2016

    The Senate received it.

  8. Feb 11, 2016

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Feb 11, 2016

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Feb 5, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Feb 5, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.

  12. Jan 7, 2016 to Jan 13, 2016

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  13. Jan 7, 2016

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jan 7, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jan 5, 2016 to Jan 6, 2016

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  16. Jan 4, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  17. Jan 4, 2016

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Goyke, J. Ott, Jacque, Skowronski, Macco, Rodriguez, Zepnick, Brostoff, Sinicki, Johnson, Kahl, Ohnstad, Riemer, Wachs, Barnes, Bowen and Young; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Harris Dodd, Carpenter and Kapenga

  2. Jan 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Jan 5, 2016 · Assembly

    Representative Hutton added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 6, 2016 · Assembly

    Representative Allen added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 7, 2016 · Assembly

    Representatives Gannon and Swearingen added as coauthors

  8. Jan 8, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Goyke and J. Ott

  9. Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Representative Genrich added as a coauthor

  10. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  12. Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  13. Feb 5, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2016 by Committee on Rules

  15. Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kerkman

  16. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  17. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  19. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  20. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  23. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  25. Feb 12, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  26. Feb 12, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  28. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  29. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Feb 17, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Feb 25, 2016 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-25-2016

  36. Mar 21, 2016 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-21-2016

  37. Mar 22, 2016 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-22-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 275

  38. Mar 22, 2016 · Assembly

    Published 3-23-2016

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote