Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 68

John Doe proceedings and providing a penalty. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Oct 20, 2015, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 5, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 20, 2015

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law governing John Doe hearings, if a district attorney requests a judge to convene a proceeding to make a determination of whether a crime has been committed, the judge must convene a proceeding to make the determination. If a person who is not a district attorney complains to a judge that he or she has reason to believe a crime has been committed, the judge must refer the complaint to a district attorney. The district attorney has 90 days to issue charges; if the district attorney does not issue charges, the district attorney must forward to the judge with jurisdiction all law enforcement reports, all records and cases files, and a written explanation for not issuing charges. If that judge determines a proceeding is necessary to determine if a crime has been committed, the judge must convene a proceeding.

Under current law, any conduct that is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both is a crime that may be investigated under a John Doe proceeding. Under this bill, the crimes that may be investigated under a John Doe proceeding are certain felonies under the Criminal Code or any conduct punishable by fine or imprisonment or both that is allegedly committed by an on-duty law enforcement officer, corrections officer, or state probation, parole, or extended supervision officer.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the judge who convenes a John Doe proceeding has discretion as to whether to keep the proceeding secret and may issue a secrecy order that extends to every participant in the proceeding. Under this bill, a judge may enter a secrecy order upon a showing of good cause by the district attorney, but the order may apply only to the judge, the district attorney or other prosecuting attorney, law enforcement personnel, interpreters, and reporters who make or transcribe a record of the proceeding. Any person who violates a secrecy order is subject to a fine of up to $10,000, imprisonment for up to nine months, or both.

This bill imposes a six-month time limit on a John Doe proceeding. This limit may be extended for additional six-month periods if a majority of judicial administrative district chief judges find good cause for each extension. This bill also provides that the same finding is required to add specified crimes to the original complaint. The vote of each judge must be available to the public.

Finally, under this bill, records reflecting the costs of John Doe investigations and proceedings are a matter of public record, temporary or permanent reserve judges are excluded from presiding over John Doe proceedings, and special prosecutors may be appointed to assist the district attorney in a John Doe proceeding only under certain conditions.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

27 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 27 are Republicans.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 36 names

Authors (27)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 11 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Sep 10, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 12 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 13 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 14 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 15 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 16 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 17 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 18 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 60 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 60, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 60 to 36 · Oct 20, 2015 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 60, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 28, 2015

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  3. Oct 22, 2015

    The Senate received it.

  4. Oct 21, 2015

    “Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)” (the official wording)

  5. Oct 20, 2015

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  6. Oct 20, 2015

    The Assembly passed it, 60 to 36.

  7. Oct 20, 2015

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Sep 10, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Sep 10, 2015

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  10. Aug 13, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. May 14, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Mar 31, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Mar 19, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Mar 16, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Mar 5, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  16. Mar 5, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Craig, Horlacher, Brandtjen, R. Brooks, Czaja, Hutton, Gannon, Jagler, Kapenga, Kleefisch, Knodl, Knudson, Kooyenga, Kremer, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Murphy, Neylon, Sanfelippo, Schraa, Skowronski, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Vorpagel, Born, Quinn and Bernier; cosponsored by Senators Tiffany, Farrow, Wanggaard, LeMahieu, Nass, Vukmir and Lazich

  2. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Mar 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 31, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Aug 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative T. Larson added as a coauthor

  8. Aug 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Goyke and Wachs

  9. Aug 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Goyke and Wachs

  10. Aug 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representatives Goyke and Wachs

  11. Aug 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Goyke

  12. Aug 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representatives Goyke and Wachs

  13. Aug 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 6 offered by Representatives Goyke and Wachs

  14. Aug 19, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 7 offered by Representatives Goyke and Wachs

  15. Aug 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  16. Sep 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  17. Sep 10, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  18. Oct 15, 2015 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-20-2015 by Committee on Rules

  19. Oct 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 8 offered by Representative Craig

  20. Oct 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 9 offered by Representative Craig

  21. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 8 adopted

  23. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 9 adopted

  24. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 10 offered by Representative Craig

  25. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 10 adopted

  26. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 11 offered by Representatives Goyke, Wachs, Hebl, Kessler and Barca

  27. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  28. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 12 offered by Representatives Kessler, Hebl, Wachs, Goyke and Barca

  29. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 12 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  30. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 13 offered by Representatives Hebl, Kessler, Wachs, Goyke and Barca

  31. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 13 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  32. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 14 offered by Representatives Wachs, Kessler, Hebl, Goyke and Barca

  33. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 14 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  34. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 15 offered by Representatives C. Taylor, Hebl, Wachs, Kessler, Goyke and Barca

  35. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 15 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  36. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 16 offered by Representatives Goyke, Wachs, Hebl, Kessler and Barca

  37. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 16 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  38. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 17 offered by Representatives Goyke, Wachs, Hebl, Kessler and Barca

  39. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 17 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  40. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 18 offered by Representatives Kessler, Hebl, Goyke, Wachs and Barca

  41. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 18 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  42. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  43. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  44. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 60, Noes 36

  45. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Representatives Jarchow and Tittl added as coauthors

  46. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 60, Noes 36

  47. Oct 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:01 PM on 10-21-2015 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 16

  48. Oct 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)

  49. Oct 22, 2015 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  50. Oct 28, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  51. Oct 28, 2015 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  52. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote