Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 70

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: creation of a private retirement security plan and making appropriations. (FE)

Employee trust funds, department of Employment Retirement — Private plans

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law the Employee Trust Fund Board (ETF board) administers

the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) under which public employees who are

covered under the WRS and their employers pay contributions to the WRS and the

WRS, from those contributions and the earnings on those contributions, provides

retirement annuities to those public employees.

This bill creates a Wisconsin Private Retirement Security Board (board) and

requires the board to establish a private retirement security plan (plan) to provide

retirement benefits for residents of this state who choose to participate in the plan.

Specifically, the bill requires the board to do all of the following:

1. Conduct a study to determine the feasibility of establishing a plan. The

feasibility study must estimate the potential population that is likely to choose to

participate in the plan and the potential cost of implementing the plan and must

recommend a design and structure for the plan that is most reasonable in light of that

potential population and cost.

2. Hold public hearings to receive testimony relating to the feasibility study

and the recommended design and structure of the plan. The board must hold not less

than five public hearings and must hold those hearings over a period of not more than

three months. The board may hold no more than one public hearing in Madison and

must ensure that at one least one public hearing is held in each geographic area of

the state, including the southeastern part of the state, the western part of the state,

the northern part of the state, and the northeastern part of the state.

3. Based on the feasibility study, the recommended design and structure of the

plan, and the testimony received at the public hearings, design the plan. The board

must design the plan so that, to the greatest extent possible, the design and structure

of the plan are reasonably commensurate with the design and structure of the WRS.

In designing the plan, the board must provide for the State of Wisconsin Investment

Board to assist the board in managing and investing the assets of the fund and the

assets of the accounts of participants in the plan and must provide for the ETF board

to assist the board in administering the plan.

4. By no later than the first day of the 18th month beginning after the effective

date of the bill, submit a report to the legislature, the governor, and the members of

the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) summarizing the conclusions of the feasibility

study, the testimony received at the public hearings, and the design of the plan. The

report must also include an estimate of the cost of initial establishment and

administration of the plan, an estimate of the amount of time necessary to make the

plan viable, and a recommendation for any legislation that is necessary to implement

the plan. On enactment of that legislation, the board must implement the plan in

accordance with that legislation.

In addition, the bill requires the Department of Employee Trust Funds to: 1)

provide staff and other resources to assist the board in the performance of the board's

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Sinicki (D) , Subeck (D) , Young (D) , Zepnick (D)

10 cosponsors

Barca and Wachs , C. Larson (D) , Hansen (D) , Harris Dodd (D) , Lassa (D) , Miller (D) , Ringhand (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Financial Institutions and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60

Failed 36–60 Jan 19, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Genrich, Jorgensen, Sargent, Goyke, Hebl, Subeck, Johnson, Riemer, Young, Ohnstad, Billings, C. Taylor, Bowen, Berceau, Sinicki and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Harris Dodd, Ringhand, Miller, C. Larson, Vinehout and Wirch

  2. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions

  3. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 17, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Financial Institutions and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60

  7. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Representatives Barca and Wachs added as coauthors

  8. Feb 24, 2016 · Assembly

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  9. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1