Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 70

Creation of a private retirement security plan and making appropriations. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 5, 2015

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law the Employee Trust Fund Board (ETF board) administers the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) under which public employees who are covered under the WRS and their employers pay contributions to the WRS and the WRS, from those contributions and the earnings on those contributions, provides retirement annuities to those public employees.

This bill creates a Wisconsin Private Retirement Security Board (board) and requires the board to establish a private retirement security plan (plan) to provide retirement benefits for residents of this state who choose to participate in the plan.

Read the full summary

Specifically, the bill requires the board to do all of the following:

1. Conduct a study to determine the feasibility of establishing a plan. The feasibility study must estimate the potential population that is likely to choose to participate in the plan and the potential cost of implementing the plan and must recommend a design and structure for the plan that is most reasonable in light of that potential population and cost.

2. Hold public hearings to receive testimony relating to the feasibility study and the recommended design and structure of the plan. The board must hold not less than five public hearings and must hold those hearings over a period of not more than three months. The board may hold no more than one public hearing in Madison and must ensure that at one least one public hearing is held in each geographic area of the state, including the southeastern part of the state, the western part of the state, the northern part of the state, and the northeastern part of the state.

3. Based on the feasibility study, the recommended design and structure of the plan, and the testimony received at the public hearings, design the plan. The board must design the plan so that, to the greatest extent possible, the design and structure of the plan are reasonably commensurate with the design and structure of the WRS.

In designing the plan, the board must provide for the State of Wisconsin Investment Board to assist the board in managing and investing the assets of the fund and the assets of the accounts of participants in the plan and must provide for the ETF board to assist the board in administering the plan.

4. By no later than the first day of the 18th month beginning after the effective date of the bill, submit a report to the legislature, the governor, and the members of the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) summarizing the conclusions of the feasibility study, the testimony received at the public hearings, and the design of the plan. The report must also include an estimate of the cost of initial establishment and administration of the plan, an estimate of the amount of time necessary to make the plan viable, and a recommendation for any legislation that is necessary to implement the plan. On enactment of that legislation, the board must implement the plan in accordance with that legislation.

In addition, the bill requires the Department of Employee Trust Funds to: 1) provide staff and other resources to assist the board in the performance of the board's duties under the bill; and 2) submit an estimate to JCF for supplemental funds from the general fund to be credited to the general purpose revenue (GPR) appropriation of the board created under the bill. The estimate must include the initial cost of establishing the board, conducting the feasibility study, holding the public hearings, designing the plan, and preparing and submitting the report. JCF must, from its GPR general program supplementation appropriation, supplement the GPR appropriation of the board in an amount equal to the estimate.

Finally, the bill permits the board to charge reasonable fees to participants in the plan to cover the costs of administering the plan, to recover the investment costs of the accounts of those participants, and to repay the general fund for amounts provided to the board for the costs of conducting the feasibility study, holding the public hearings, designing the plan, and preparing and submitting the report and for the costs of the initial establishment and administration of the plan.

Who's behind it

16 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 16 are Democrats.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 26 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Failed, 36 to 60 · Jan 19, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Financial Institutions and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 18, 2016 to Feb 24, 2016

    2 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.

  3. Mar 17, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Mar 16, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Mar 5, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Mar 5, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.

  7. Mar 5, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Genrich, Jorgensen, Sargent, Goyke, Hebl, Subeck, Johnson, Riemer, Young, Ohnstad, Billings, C. Taylor, Bowen, Berceau, Sinicki and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Harris Dodd, Ringhand, Miller, C. Larson, Vinehout and Wirch

  2. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions

  3. Mar 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 17, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Financial Institutions and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 60

  7. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Representatives Barca and Wachs added as coauthors

  8. Feb 24, 2016 · Assembly

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  9. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote