Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: action required to be taken in response to a discharge of hazardous substances, exemption from liability for certain hazardous substance discharges, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Environmental protection Justice, department of Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Waterways and water power
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes changes to the requirements that apply if residual
contamination remains on a property after a hazardous substance cleanup is
completed. The bill also creates requirements for obtaining a liability exemption
relating to contaminated sediment.
Current law generally requires a person who possesses or controls a hazardous
substance that has been discharged or who causes the discharge of a hazardous
substance to restore the environment to the extent practicable and minimize the
harmful effects from the discharge. Generally, the Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) is the agency that administers the laws with respect to discharges of
hazardous substances, although the Department of Agriculture, Trade and
Consumer Protection (DATCP) has authority to require a person who discharges an
agricultural chemical to take necessary corrective action.
Sites with residual contamination after cleanup
This bill makes changes to the requirements that apply if residual
contamination remains on a property after a hazardous substance cleanup is
completed.
Under current law, DNR or DATCP may impose certain requirements as a
condition of approving a cleanup of a hazardous substance discharge or issuing a case
closure letter if residual contamination remains on a property after the conclusion
of a cleanup. Under current law the agency may require 1) maintenance of an
engineering control on the property; 2) investigation and, if necessary, additional
remedial action if a structure is removed that had prevented a complete investigation
or remedial action at the property; and 3) any other limitations or conditions related
to the property to protect public health, safety, and welfare and the environment, and
to promote economic development. An engineering control is an object or action that
is designed to contain contamination or minimize the spread of contamination, such
as a cap or a soil cover. Under the bill, an engineering control does not include a
sediment cover, which is a layer of uncontaminated sand or similar material that is
deposited on top of contaminated sediment. Under current law, the property owner
is responsible for maintaining the engineering control and conducting additional
investigation or remedial action, unless there is an agreement in place for someone
else to do so. Either the property owner or a person who occupies the property is
responsible for complying with any other limitations or conditions that the agency
imposes on the property.
Under this bill, DNR or DATCP may impose additional requirements as a
condition of approving remedial action or of issuing a case closure letter if a person
is required to clean up contaminated sediment or a discharge of a hazardous
substance that resulted in contaminated sediment, and the person uses an
engineering control to address residual contamination remaining on the property.
If the person uses an engineering control, the agency may require that the person
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Environment and Forestry, Ayes 12, Noes 1
Passed 12–1 Feb 4, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Tittl, Genrich, Berceau, Czaja, Jacque, Kahl, Macco, Nygren, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Petryk, Shankland, Sinicki, Steffen, Subeck, Swearingen and Considine; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Lassa, Hansen, Lasee, Petrowski, Tiffany and LeMahieu
- Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Environment and Forestry
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 20, 2016 · Assembly
- Jan 20, 2016 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Environment and Forestry, Ayes 12, Noes 1
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1