Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 709

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: creating an individual income tax deduction for certain income earned by an individual from the practice of psychiatry. (FE)

Income tax — Deduction Legislature — Tax exemptions, joint survey committee on Physician Plants

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill creates an individual income tax subtract modification, or deduction,

for up to $200,000 of income earned in this state by a psychiatrist, in the taxable year

to which the claim relates, from the practice of psychiatry. The deduction may not

be claimed for more than ten years, and must be claimed during the ten-year period

that begins once the claimant first claims the credit. The deduction must be claimed

initially within the first two years that a psychiatrist begins to practice in this state,

or within the first two years that a psychiatrist returns to this state after practicing

in another state for at least one year. If an individual begins to claim the deduction

and is then ineligible to claim the deduction in any year that he or she is a full-year

resident of this state, the individual may again claim the deduction in a future year

if eligible to do so. If an individual begins to claim the deduction but is unable to claim

it for ten consecutive years because he or she leaves the state, the individual must

add to his or her tax that is due for the year in which he or she leaves the state the

sum of all gross tax due, based on a recalculation of taxable income that assumes the

individual did not claim the deduction, for the years in which he or she claimed the

deduction. In addition, an individual who is eligible for and claims the deduction

may not claim the homestead tax credit.

Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be

referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions for a report to be printed

as an appendix to the bill.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Brostoff (D) , Edming (R) , Kremer (R) , Novak (R) , Petryk (R) , Quinn (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Tittl (R) , VanderMeer (R)

2 cosponsors

L. Taylor (D) , Olsen (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 11, Noes 0

Passed 11–0 Feb 12, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 7, Noes 4

Passed 7–4 Feb 12, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tittl, Brostoff, Edming, Kremer, Novak, A. Ott, Petryk, Quinn, Rohrkaste and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senators Olsen and L. Taylor

  2. Jan 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Jan 22, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Tittl

  5. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  8. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 7, Noes 4

  9. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1