Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 801

Substitution of judges in criminal matters. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 25, 2016

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill eliminates the right of a defendant to substitute a judge in a criminal proceeding without explanation or reason. Current law generally allows a defendant one such substitution.

The bill requires a defendant who wishes to substitute a judge in a criminal proceeding to indicate in writing his or her reasons for the substitution request.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, the reasons for requesting a substitution must be one or more of the following:

1. The judge was engaged as counsel in the action prior to being appointed or elected as a judge;

2. The judge is otherwise interested in the action;

3. The judge is related to either party to the action;

4. The judge is a material witness in the action; or 5. The defendant has reason to believe that he or she cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial on account of the judge's bias, prejudice, or interest of the judge.

Who's behind it

4 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 4 are Republicans.

See all 4 names

Authors (4)

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 25, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  3. Jan 25, 2016

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 25, 2016 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Gannon, Horlacher and Steffen

  2. Jan 25, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor