Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: duties of the Public Service Commission under the broadband expansion grant program and certification of political subdivisions under that program. (FE)
Data processing Industrial development Municipality — Planning Ordinance Public service commission
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill imposes certain duties on the Public Service Commission regarding
broadband infrastructure. Current law requires the PSC to designate areas of the
state that are served by fewer than two broadband service providers as underserved
areas and make grants for constructing broadband infrastructure in those areas in
accordance with specified priorities. The bill requires the PSC to encourage the
development of broadband infrastructure in those areas. The bill also requires the
PSC to provide comprehensive information concerning permits required for
broadband network projects and related business activities in the state. In addition,
the PSC must work with other state and local agencies to encourage timely and
efficient issuance of permits and resolution of related issues, as well as encourage
local and federal government agencies to coordinate activities related to approving
applications and issuing permits related to broadband network projects.
The bill imposes additional priorities on the PSC in making the grants
described above. Under the bill, the PSC must give priority to projects that promote
economic development. Also, the PSC must give priority to projects in a city, village,
town, or county (political subdivision) that the PSC has certified as a Broadband
Forward! community. To be eligible for that certification, a political subdivision must
enact an ordinance for reviewing applications and issuing permits related to
broadband network projects. The ordinance must provide for all of the following: a
single point of contact; specified deadlines on the political subdivision's
consideration of applications; specified requirements on the denial and approval of
applications; filing by electronic or another means authorized by the PSC; and
reasonable fees. The bill allows the PSC to develop a model ordinance that complies
with the bill's requirements. If a political subdivision enacts an ordinance that is
different from a model ordinance, the bill requires the political subdivision, when
applying for certification, to submit a written statement describing the ordinance
and how it differs from the model ordinance.
The bill requires the PSC to prescribe the form and manner for political
subdivisions to apply for certification. The PSC must also prescribe a process for
public notice and comment on applications for a period of at least 30 days, and the
PSC must consider any public comments before making a certification. However, the
process for public notice and comment does not apply to an application by a political
subdivision that enacts a model ordinance developed by the PSC or submits the
written statement described above.
The bill imposes the following prohibitions on a political subdivision that the
PSC certifies as a Broadband Ready! community: requiring designation of a final
contractor to complete a broadband network project; imposing application fees that
exceed $100; imposing unreasonable fees; imposing moratoriums on applications,
permits, or construction related to broadband network projects; discriminating
among public utilities and certain other entities; requiring applicants to provide any
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 15, Noes 0
Passed 15–0 Feb 11, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 10, Noes 5
Passed 10–5 Feb 11, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34
Passed 63–34 Feb 16, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34
Passed 63–34 Feb 16, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 8, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 29, 2016 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Quinn, E. Brooks, Tranel, VanderMeer, Bernier, Kulp, Mursau, Novak, Krug, T. Larson, Nerison, Spiros, Edming, Ripp, Swearingen, Petryk, Czaja, Kitchens, Tauchen, A. Ott and Macco; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Harsdorf, Roth, Gudex and Tiffany
- Jan 29, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Mining and Rural Development
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Quinn
- Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 10, Noes 5
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Barca, Shankland, Jorgensen and Zamarripa
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Billings
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Representative Jarchow added as a coauthor
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 17, 2016 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 17, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs
- Mar 1, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 8, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 8, 2016 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 8, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 14, 2016 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-15-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 15, 2016 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2016 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2016 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2016 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 15, 2016 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 16, 2016 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 21, 2016 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2016
- Mar 23, 2016 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-23-2016
- Mar 24, 2016 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 3-24-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 278
- Mar 24, 2016 · Assembly
Published 3-25-2016