Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 820

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: duties of the Public Service Commission under the broadband expansion grant program and certification of political subdivisions under that program. (FE)

Data processing Industrial development Municipality — Planning Ordinance Public service commission

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill imposes certain duties on the Public Service Commission regarding

broadband infrastructure. Current law requires the PSC to designate areas of the

state that are served by fewer than two broadband service providers as underserved

areas and make grants for constructing broadband infrastructure in those areas in

accordance with specified priorities. The bill requires the PSC to encourage the

development of broadband infrastructure in those areas. The bill also requires the

PSC to provide comprehensive information concerning permits required for

broadband network projects and related business activities in the state. In addition,

the PSC must work with other state and local agencies to encourage timely and

efficient issuance of permits and resolution of related issues, as well as encourage

local and federal government agencies to coordinate activities related to approving

applications and issuing permits related to broadband network projects.

The bill imposes additional priorities on the PSC in making the grants

described above. Under the bill, the PSC must give priority to projects that promote

economic development. Also, the PSC must give priority to projects in a city, village,

town, or county (political subdivision) that the PSC has certified as a Broadband

Forward! community. To be eligible for that certification, a political subdivision must

enact an ordinance for reviewing applications and issuing permits related to

broadband network projects. The ordinance must provide for all of the following: a

single point of contact; specified deadlines on the political subdivision's

consideration of applications; specified requirements on the denial and approval of

applications; filing by electronic or another means authorized by the PSC; and

reasonable fees. The bill allows the PSC to develop a model ordinance that complies

with the bill's requirements. If a political subdivision enacts an ordinance that is

different from a model ordinance, the bill requires the political subdivision, when

applying for certification, to submit a written statement describing the ordinance

and how it differs from the model ordinance.

The bill requires the PSC to prescribe the form and manner for political

subdivisions to apply for certification. The PSC must also prescribe a process for

public notice and comment on applications for a period of at least 30 days, and the

PSC must consider any public comments before making a certification. However, the

process for public notice and comment does not apply to an application by a political

subdivision that enacts a model ordinance developed by the PSC or submits the

written statement described above.

The bill imposes the following prohibitions on a political subdivision that the

PSC certifies as a Broadband Ready! community: requiring designation of a final

contractor to complete a broadband network project; imposing application fees that

exceed $100; imposing unreasonable fees; imposing moratoriums on applications,

permits, or construction related to broadband network projects; discriminating

among public utilities and certain other entities; requiring applicants to provide any

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bernier (R) , Czaja (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Edming (R) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Kulp (R) , Macco (R) , Mursau (R) , Nerison (R) , Novak (R) , Petryk (R) , Quinn (R) , Ripp (R) , Spiros (R) , Swearingen (R) , T. Larson (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tranel (R) , VanderMeer (R)

6 cosponsors

Gudex (R) , Harsdorf (R) , Jarchow (R) , Marklein (R) , Roth (R) , Tiffany (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 15, Noes 0

Passed 15–0 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 10, Noes 5

Passed 10–5 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34

Passed 63–34 Feb 16, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34

Passed 63–34 Feb 16, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 8, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 29, 2016 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Quinn, E. Brooks, Tranel, VanderMeer, Bernier, Kulp, Mursau, Novak, Krug, T. Larson, Nerison, Spiros, Edming, Ripp, Swearingen, Petryk, Czaja, Kitchens, Tauchen, A. Ott and Macco; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Harsdorf, Roth, Gudex and Tiffany

  2. Jan 29, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Mining and Rural Development

  3. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Quinn

  6. Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  8. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Mining and Rural Development, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  9. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 by Committee on Rules

  11. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Barca, Shankland, Jorgensen and Zamarripa

  13. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34

  14. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Billings

  16. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 34

  17. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Representative Jarchow added as a coauthor

  21. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Feb 17, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Feb 17, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs

  24. Mar 1, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  25. Mar 8, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  26. Mar 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  27. Mar 8, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  28. Mar 14, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-15-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  29. Mar 15, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Mar 15, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 15, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 15, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 15, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Mar 21, 2016 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2016

  36. Mar 23, 2016 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-23-2016

  37. Mar 24, 2016 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-24-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 278

  38. Mar 24, 2016 · Assembly

    Published 3-25-2016