Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: fraud in parental choice programs, Medicaid expansion, eligibility for BadgerCare Plus and BadgerCare Plus Core, and providing a criminal penalty.
District attorney Divorce Federal aid Fraud Health services, department of — Health Insurance — Health Justice, department of Legislature — Finance, joint committee on Medical assistance Milwaukee — School Milwaukee bucks School — Attendance
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill subjects certain acts and omissions related to a Parental Choice
Program (PCP) to criminal penalties and changes the family income eligibility level
to up to 133 percent of the federal poverty line (FPL) for parents and caretaker
relatives under BadgerCare Plus (BC+) and for childless adults under BadgerCare
Plus Core (BC+ Core).
Under the bill, intentionally making a false statement or representation in an
application to participate in a PCP is a Class A misdemeanor. The bill makes
concealing or failing to disclose an event with an intent to fraudulently participate
in a PCP or using a payment received under a PCP for an unauthorized purpose
either a Class G or Class H felony, depending on the payment a person received under
the PCP. Additionally, under the bill, a statement in a written application for a PCP
is considered to be an admission of the existence, correctness, or validity of the
statement. This bill authorizes the Department of Justice or a district attorney to
prosecute violations of criminal laws affecting a PCP, including laws affecting the
health, safety, and welfare of pupils attending a private school participating in a PCP.
Currently, the Department of Health Services (DHS) administers the Medical
Assistance (MA) program, which is a joint federal and state program that provides
health services to individuals who have limited financial resources. Some services
are provided through programs that operate under a waiver of federal Medicaid laws,
including services provided through the BC+ and BC+ Core programs. Certain
parents and caretaker relatives with incomes of not more than 100 percent of the
FPL, before a 5 percent income disregard is applied, are eligible for BC+ benefits.
Adults who are under age 65, who have family incomes that do not exceed 100 percent
of the FPL, before a 5 percent income disregard is applied, and who are not otherwise
eligible for MA, including BC+ (childless adults), are eligible for benefits under BC+
Core.
The federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allows a state to receive
an enhanced federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) payment for providing
benefits to certain individuals through a state's MA program. The bill expands the
income eligibility level for parents and caretaker relatives under BC+ and for
childless adults under BC+ Core. The bill requires DHS to comply with all federal
requirements and to submit any amendment to the state MA plan, request for a
waiver of Medicaid law, or other federal approval necessary to qualify for the highest
available enhanced FMAP for parents and caretaker relatives and childless adults
eligible for BC+ Core (collectively nonpregnant, nonelderly adults). If DHS does not
qualify for the enhanced FMAP or if the FMAP is reduced, DHS is required to submit
to the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) a fiscal analysis comparing the cost of
covering nonpregnant, nonelderly adults under the MA program at up to 133 percent
of the FPL to the cost of limiting income eligibility to those adults to up to 100 percent
of the FPL. DHS may reduce income eligibility levels for nonpregnant, nonelderly
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 35, Noes 62
Failed 35–62 Feb 9, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly
- Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 35, Noes 62
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1