Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: long-term care districts and care management organizations. (FE)
Corporation County — Human services Health services, department of — Supportive living and treatment Insurance — Commissioner, office of Nursing homes and adult care
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows the Department of Health Services to contract with a county or
long-term care district to operate a care management organization outside the
geographic area of that county or long-term care district and specifies a different
disposition of property and assets upon dissolution of a long-term care district. The
bill also allows a long-term care district or a governmental entity that has a contract
to operate a care management organization to create a nonstock, nonprofit
corporation or a service insurance corporation and to assign certain contracts,
permits, and certifications to the corporation with approval of DHS and the Office
of the Commissioner of Insurance.
Currently, a care management organization, under a contract with DHS,
enrolls individuals in the Family Care program and administers the Family Care
benefit, which provides financial assistance for long-term care to a frail elder or a
person with a physical or developmental disability. DHS may contract with a county,
a long-term care district, a governing body of a tribe or band or the Great Lakes
Inter-Tribal Council, a joint association of those entities, or a private organization
to be a care management organization. A county, tribe or band, or a combination of
counties or tribes or bands may create a long-term care district, which is a special
purpose district that is a local unit of government. Currently, the jurisdiction of a
long-term care district is the geographic area of the county or counties that created
the district or the geographic area of the reservation of, or land held in trust for, any
tribe or band that created the district. This bill allows DHS to contract with a county
or long-term care district to operate a care management organization outside the
geographic area of that county or long-term care district. The bill specifies that DHS
may award contracts to one or more certified entities to operate a care management
organization within a county or geographic area. If DHS awards a contract to a
long-term care district to operate a care management organization outside the
geographic area of the counties that created the long-term care district, the bill
allows any county that is newly served by that care management organization to join
the existing long-term care district under certain circumstances at the discretion of
the long-term care district's board. The bill also specifies that upon dissolution of
a long-term care district the property and the assets of the corporation transfer to
DHS instead of the entity that created the long-term care district.
The bill also allows a long-term care district or a governmental entity that has
a contract to operate a care management organization to create a nonstock, nonprofit
corporation or a service insurance corporation. Before creating the corporation that
provides the Family Care benefit, the long-term care district or governmental entity
must submit the proposed articles of incorporation to DHS for review and approval.
With approval of DHS and OCI, the long-term care district or governmental entity
may then assign to the corporation the district's assets and liabilities, a contract with
DHS to operate a care management organization, a permit issued by OCI to operate
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
Passed 16–0 Feb 11, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
Passed 16–0 Feb 11, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Krug, Novak, Bernier, Edming, Knodl, Mursau, A. Ott, Petryk, Quinn, Rohrkaste, Tauchen, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer and Knudson; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Cowles, Lasee, Lassa, Petrowski, Roth, Vukmir and Olsen
- Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Krug
- Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Joint Committee on Finance
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 15, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 15, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 2:06 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1