Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

AB 856

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: long-term care districts and care management organizations. (FE)

Corporation County — Human services Health services, department of — Supportive living and treatment Insurance — Commissioner, office of Nursing homes and adult care

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill allows the Department of Health Services to contract with a county or

long-term care district to operate a care management organization outside the

geographic area of that county or long-term care district and specifies a different

disposition of property and assets upon dissolution of a long-term care district. The

bill also allows a long-term care district or a governmental entity that has a contract

to operate a care management organization to create a nonstock, nonprofit

corporation or a service insurance corporation and to assign certain contracts,

permits, and certifications to the corporation with approval of DHS and the Office

of the Commissioner of Insurance.

Currently, a care management organization, under a contract with DHS,

enrolls individuals in the Family Care program and administers the Family Care

benefit, which provides financial assistance for long-term care to a frail elder or a

person with a physical or developmental disability. DHS may contract with a county,

a long-term care district, a governing body of a tribe or band or the Great Lakes

Inter-Tribal Council, a joint association of those entities, or a private organization

to be a care management organization. A county, tribe or band, or a combination of

counties or tribes or bands may create a long-term care district, which is a special

purpose district that is a local unit of government. Currently, the jurisdiction of a

long-term care district is the geographic area of the county or counties that created

the district or the geographic area of the reservation of, or land held in trust for, any

tribe or band that created the district. This bill allows DHS to contract with a county

or long-term care district to operate a care management organization outside the

geographic area of that county or long-term care district. The bill specifies that DHS

may award contracts to one or more certified entities to operate a care management

organization within a county or geographic area. If DHS awards a contract to a

long-term care district to operate a care management organization outside the

geographic area of the counties that created the long-term care district, the bill

allows any county that is newly served by that care management organization to join

the existing long-term care district under certain circumstances at the discretion of

the long-term care district's board. The bill also specifies that upon dissolution of

a long-term care district the property and the assets of the corporation transfer to

DHS instead of the entity that created the long-term care district.

The bill also allows a long-term care district or a governmental entity that has

a contract to operate a care management organization to create a nonstock, nonprofit

corporation or a service insurance corporation. Before creating the corporation that

provides the Family Care benefit, the long-term care district or governmental entity

must submit the proposed articles of incorporation to DHS for review and approval.

With approval of DHS and OCI, the long-term care district or governmental entity

may then assign to the corporation the district's assets and liabilities, a contract with

DHS to operate a care management organization, a permit issued by OCI to operate

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bernier (R) , Edming (R) , Knodl (R) , Knudson (R) , Krug (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Petryk (R) , Quinn (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tittl (R) , Tranel (R) , VanderMeer (R)

8 cosponsors

Cowles (R) , Lasee (R) , Lassa (D) , Marklein (R) , Olsen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Roth (R) , Vukmir (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

Passed 16–0 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

Passed 16–0 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krug, Novak, Bernier, Edming, Knodl, Mursau, A. Ott, Petryk, Quinn, Rohrkaste, Tauchen, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer and Knudson; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Cowles, Lasee, Lassa, Petrowski, Roth, Vukmir and Olsen

  2. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  3. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Krug

  4. Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 10, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Joint Committee on Finance

  7. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  8. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  9. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 15, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Feb 15, 2016 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 2:06 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  13. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  14. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1