Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 92

Penalties for violations related to the motor vehicle liability insurance requirement, proof of financial responsibility, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 12, 2015

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions, a person from operating a motor vehicle on a highway unless the vehicle owner or operator has in effect a motor vehicle liability insurance policy with respect to the motor vehicle. Any person who violates this requirement may be required to forfeit not more than $500. Current law also prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle on a highway unless the person has in his or her immediate possession proof that he or she is in compliance with the insurance requirement. Any person who violates this provision may be required to forfeit $10.

Also under current law, a person may not do any of the following for purposes of creating the appearance of satisfying the insurance requirement:

Read the full summary

1. Forge, falsify, counterfeit, or fraudulently alter an insurance document.

2. Possess any forged, falsified, fictitious, counterfeit, or fraudulently altered insurance document.

3. Represent that an insurance document is valid and in effect, knowing or having reason to believe that the document is not valid or not in effect.

Any person who violates this provision may be required to forfeit not more than $5,000.

This bill alters the penalties for violations of the motor vehicle insurance requirements. Under this bill, a person who violates the requirement that the owner or operator of a motor vehicle be insured is subject to the following penalties:

1. A forfeiture of not less than $1,000 and not more than $5,000 for a first offense.

2. A forfeiture of not less than $2,500 nor more than $7,500 for a second or subsequent offense occurring within three years.

3. If the person, in the course of the violation, causes bodily harm to another or damage to the property of another, a forfeiture of not less than $5,000 nor more than $7,500. If, however, the person committing the violation knows at the time of the violation that he or she is not appropriately insured, the person committing the violation is guilty of a Class I felony, punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed three years and six months, or both.

4. If the person, in the course of the violation, causes the death of another, a forfeiture of not less than $7,500 nor more than $10,000. If, however, the person committing the violation knows at the time of the violation that he or she is not appropriately insured, the person committing the violation is guilty of a Class H felony, punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed six years, or both.

Also under this bill, a person who violates the possession of proof of insurance requirement may be required to forfeit not less than $25 nor more than $125 for a first offense, not less than $150 nor more than $300 for the second offense occurring within three years, and not less than $250 nor more than $500 for the third or subsequent offense occurring within three years.

This bill also provides that a person who violates a prohibition on improperly creating the appearance of satisfying the insurance requirement may be required to forfeit not less than $1,000 nor more than $5,000 for a first offense and not less than $2,500 nor more than $7,500 for a second or subsequent offense occurring within three years.

Also under current law, if the Department of Transportation (DOT) receives a certified copy of a judgment for damages of $500 or more arising out of a motor vehicle accident, DOT must, with certain exceptions, immediately suspend the operating privilege and all registrations of the person against whom the judgment was rendered unless the person can provide proof of financial responsibility. Proof of financial responsibility may be given by filing certification of coverage under a motor vehicle liability insurance policy with minimum limits for any single accident of $25,000 for bodily injury to or death of one person, $50,000 for bodily injury to or death of more than one person, and $10,000 for property damage. Alternatively, proof of financial responsibility may be furnished by depositing with DOT $60,000 in cash or certain securities with a market value of $60,000. DOT must then hold the deposit of cash or securities to satisfy any judgment against the person making the deposit for damages resulting from the ownership, maintenance, use, or operation of a motor vehicle, including damages for bodily injury, death, or property damage.

Under this bill, if DOT receives a record of conviction for operating a motor vehicle on a highway without having in effect a motor vehicle liability insurance policy with respect to the vehicle, DOT must suspend the person's operating privilege and all registrations of the person unless the person can provide proof of financial responsibility. The proof of financial responsibility requirement remains in effect for five years from the date of conviction.

Finally, this bill prohibits a person who violates the requirement that the owner or operator of a motor vehicle be insured from recovering noneconomic damages in an action arising from a motor vehicle accident involving an insured person, regardless of who is at fault in the accident.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

7 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 7 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 4, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  3. Jun 3, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. May 28, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. May 14, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Mar 25, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Mar 20, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Mar 12, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  9. Mar 12, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sanfelippo, Spiros, Weatherston, T. Larson, Kapenga, J. Ott and Brandtjen; cosponsored by Senator Nass

  2. Mar 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Mar 20, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 25, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 26, 2015 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  6. Apr 23, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kulp, Jacque and Sanfelippo

  7. Apr 29, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Horlacher, Jarchow and Sanfelippo

  8. May 11, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Horlacher, Jarchow, Jacque, Kulp and Sanfelippo

  9. May 14, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  10. May 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sanfelippo

  11. May 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Jun 3, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Oct 27, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sanfelippo

  14. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  15. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  16. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  17. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 6 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  18. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 7 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  19. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 8 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  20. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 9 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  21. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 10 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  22. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 11 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  23. Oct 28, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 12 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  24. Nov 4, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor

  25. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate