Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: authorizing the circuit court to order a person who engages in discrimination in employment on the basis of military service to pay compensatory and punitive damages. (FE)
Circuit court Damage _personal injury_ Discrimination in employment Military personnel Military service Workforce development, department of
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill permits the Department of Workforce Development or a person who
has been discriminated against on the basis of military service to bring an action in
circuit court to recover compensatory and punitive damages caused by the act of
discrimination, plus reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in the action, after
the completion of all administrative proceedings before DWD and the Labor and
Industry Review Commission concerning the violation. Those damages are in
addition to any back pay or other amounts awarded in the administrative
proceeding. The bill, however, does not permit an action for damages to be brought
against any local governmental unit or against any employer employing fewer than
15 individuals.
Under the bill, if the circuit court finds that a defendant has discriminated on
the basis of military service, the circuit court must order the defendant to pay to the
person discriminated against compensatory and punitive damages in an amount
that the circuit court finds appropriate, subject to the following limitations:
1. If the defendant employs 100 or fewer employees, $50,000.
2. If the defendant employs more than 100 but fewer than 201 employees,
$100,000.
3. If the defendant employs more than 200 but fewer than 501 employees,
$200,000.
4. If the defendant employs more than 500 employees, $300,000.
Under current law, employment discrimination on the basis of military service
includes discriminating against an individual because the individual is or applies to
be a member of the U.S. armed forces, the state defense force, the national guard of
any state, or any reserve component of the U.S. armed forces or because the
individual performs, has performed, applies to perform, or has an obligation to
perform military service. Employment discrimination on the basis of military
service, however, does not include refusing to hire, employ, or license an individual
or barring or terminating an individual from employment or licensure because the
individual has been less than honorably discharged from military service and the
circumstances of the discharge substantially relate to the circumstances of the
particular job or licensed activity.
Under current law, a person alleging discrimination in employment on the basis
of military service may file a complaint with DWD seeking action that will effectuate
the purpose of the employment discrimination law, including reinstating the
complainant, providing back pay, and paying costs and attorney fees. Current law,
however, does not authorize DWD to award compensatory or punitive damages to a
complainant.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Mason (D) , Meyers (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Riemer (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Young (D)
Full history
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Hesselbein, Milroy, Riemer, Goyke, Jorgensen, Ohnstad, Subeck, Mason, Johnson, Shankland, Berceau, Barnes, Spreitzer, Meyers, Young, Brostoff, Bowen, Billings, Stuck, Hebl and C. Taylor; cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Lassa, Hansen, L. Taylor, Wirch, C. Larson, Erpenbach and Harris Dodd
- Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs
- Mar 21, 2016 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1