Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Assembly Bill 93

Bonding, spending, and taxation authority and auditing of local professional baseball park districts. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 12, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a professional baseball park district (district) is created in each county with a population of at least 600,000 (presently, only Milwaukee County) and all counties that are contiguous to that county (in relation to Milwaukee County, these counties are Ozaukee County, Racine County, Washington County and Waukesha County). A district is governed by a board that consists of six persons appointed by the governor, two persons appointed by the chief executive officer of the most populous county within the district's jurisdiction, one person appointed by the chief executive officer of each of the other counties in the jurisdiction, and one person appointed by the mayor of the most populous city within the jurisdiction.

A district has a variety of powers. Among these, a district may acquire, construct, equip, maintain, improve, operate, and manage baseball park facilities and may set standards governing the use of, and the conduct within, baseball park facilities. A district is authorized to impose a sales tax and a use tax at a rate of no more than 0.1 percent. Also, a district may issue bonds for the purpose of purchasing, acquiring, leasing, constructing, extending, adding to, improving, conducting, controlling, operating, or managing baseball park facilities. Bonds issued by the district must be secured only by the district's interest in any baseball park facilities, by income from these facilities, and by the sales tax and use tax that the district is authorized to levy. The district may not collect such taxes after the calendar quarter in which the district certifies to the Department of Revenue that the district has retired all of its bonds.

Read the full summary

This bill limits the district's authority to issue bonds and to expend tax moneys.

Under this bill, with an exception, a district may issue bonds only if: 1) the date on which the bonds are payable is not later than the latest date on which outstanding district bonds are payable; and 2) the total amount of principal and interest that must be paid for outstanding bonds is not increased by the issuance of refunding bonds. Also, a district may expend tax moneys only for payments of principal and interest on bonds issued by the district, current operating expenses, or routine maintenance of Miller Park facilities.

This bill also alters the procedure for terminating the sales tax and use tax levied by the district. Under this bill, the authority of the district to levy these taxes ends after the Legislative Fiscal Bureau determines that: 1) the bonds of the district have been retired; and 2) a sufficient fund for routine maintenance has been funded.

This bill also provides that a district may annually spend no more than 4 percent of expected revenues for administrative expenses and must spend not less than 75 percent of expected revenues for bond related purposes.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · May 13, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 1 · May 13, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. May 13, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. May 13, 2015

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 1.

  4. Apr 21, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Apr 13, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Apr 7, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Mar 12, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  8. Mar 12, 2015

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Weatherston, Mason, E. Brooks, Hutton, Knodl, Kremer, Murphy, J. Ott and Sanfelippo; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Wirch and Nass

  2. Mar 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 7, 2015 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Weatherston

  5. Apr 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 21, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. May 5, 2015 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  10. May 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote