Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: bonding, spending, and taxation authority and auditing of local professional baseball park districts. (FE)
Athletics Bonds Legislative fiscal bureau Milwaukee brewers Sales tax
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a professional baseball park district (district) is created in
each county with a population of at least 600,000 (presently, only Milwaukee County)
and all counties that are contiguous to that county (in relation to Milwaukee County,
these counties are Ozaukee County, Racine County, Washington County and
Waukesha County). A district is governed by a board that consists of six persons
appointed by the governor, two persons appointed by the chief executive officer of the
most populous county within the district's jurisdiction, one person appointed by the
chief executive officer of each of the other counties in the jurisdiction, and one person
appointed by the mayor of the most populous city within the jurisdiction.
A district has a variety of powers. Among these, a district may acquire,
construct, equip, maintain, improve, operate, and manage baseball park facilities
and may set standards governing the use of, and the conduct within, baseball park
facilities. A district is authorized to impose a sales tax and a use tax at a rate of no
more than 0.1 percent. Also, a district may issue bonds for the purpose of purchasing,
acquiring, leasing, constructing, extending, adding to, improving, conducting,
controlling, operating, or managing baseball park facilities. Bonds issued by the
district must be secured only by the district's interest in any baseball park facilities,
by income from these facilities, and by the sales tax and use tax that the district is
authorized to levy. The district may not collect such taxes after the calendar quarter
in which the district certifies to the Department of Revenue that the district has
retired all of its bonds.
This bill limits the district's authority to issue bonds and to expend tax moneys.
Under this bill, with an exception, a district may issue bonds only if: 1) the date on
which the bonds are payable is not later than the latest date on which outstanding
district bonds are payable; and 2) the total amount of principal and interest that
must be paid for outstanding bonds is not increased by the issuance of refunding
bonds. Also, a district may expend tax moneys only for payments of principal and
interest on bonds issued by the district, current operating expenses, or routine
maintenance of Miller Park facilities.
This bill also alters the procedure for terminating the sales tax and use tax
levied by the district. Under this bill, the authority of the district to levy these taxes
ends after the Legislative Fiscal Bureau determines that: 1) the bonds of the district
have been retired; and 2) a sufficient fund for routine maintenance has been funded.
This bill also provides that a district may annually spend no more than 4
percent of expected revenues for administrative expenses and must spend not less
than 75 percent of expected revenues for bond related purposes.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 May 13, 2015 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1
Passed 7–1 May 13, 2015 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 12, 2015 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Weatherston, Mason, E. Brooks, Hutton, Knodl, Kremer, Murphy, J. Ott and Sanfelippo; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Wirch and Nass
- Mar 12, 2015 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Apr 7, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 7, 2015 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Weatherston
- Apr 13, 2015 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 21, 2015 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 5, 2015 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 13, 2015 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- May 13, 2015 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- May 13, 2015 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2016 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1