Assembly Bill 937
Racial profiling and other discriminatory policing practices and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 18, 2016
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill addresses racial profiling and other discriminatory policing practices as a violation of an individual's rights and allows for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and an individual to pursue a civil action if an individual's civil rights are violated.
Constitutional rights and civil actions Article I of the Wisconsin Constitution guarantees certain rights, including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; to freedom of speech, assembly, and religion; to petition the government; to a trial by jury; to a remedy for all wrongs; to be treated with fairness, dignity, and respect if a crime victim; to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures; to keep and bear arms; and to fish, hunt, trap, and take game. Article I also guarantees a criminal defendant the rights to counsel, to confront his or her accusers, to a speedy and public trial, to due process of law, to reasonable bail, and to habeas corpus and prohibits double jeopardy, self-incrimination, and cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, Article I prohibits ex post facto laws, laws impairing the obligation of contract, and the taking of property for public use without just compensation (Article I rights).
Read the full summary Show less
This bill permits a person to bring a civil action in circuit court for violation of his or her Article I rights against any person that caused the injury, including the state or any political subdivision of the state, within six years after the alleged Article I rights violation. Under the bill, the circuit court may issue an injunction or restraining order and may order any other relief the court considers appropriate, including compensatory and punitive damages and reasonable costs, expert witness fees, and attorney fees. This civil action remedy is in addition to any other remedy under current law.
The bill also creates a council within DOJ that is charged with investigating claims of racial profiling and other discriminatory policing practices. Under the bill, racial profiling and other discriminatory practices include any action taken by a law enforcement officer, against or toward an individual that relies, to any degree, on the individual's actual or perceived race, color, ethnicity, religion, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, immigration or citizenship status, language spoken, disability or illness, housing status, occupation or employment status, or socioeconomic status. However, it is not racial profiling or a discriminatory policing practice for a law enforcement officer to rely on any of those factors if the factor links the individual to a specific, reliable description of an individual suspected of committing a crime.
Under the bill, if the council finds probable cause that an act of racial profiling or other discriminatory policing practice occurred, it may refer the matter to the law enforcement agency that employs the offending officer for disciplinary action against the officer and may refer the matter to DOJ for civil action as a violation of the individual's Article I rights. The bill authorizes DOJ to bring an action in court to obtain equitable or injunctive relief in order to protect the civil rights of individuals.
data collection Under current law, a law enforcement agency must collect information concerning each person whom the law enforcement agency arrests or takes into custody if the person has committed certain offenses or is a fugitive from justice. The information that the law enforcement agency must collect includes the person's fingerprints, photographs of the person's face and profile, and other available identifying data. The information collected must be forwarded to DOJ, which maintains the information for various law enforcement and reporting purposes.
The bill requires a law enforcement agency to collect the following information concerning motor vehicle stops made on or after January 1, 2017: 1) the name, address, gender, and race of the operator of the motor vehicle, with the officer subjectively determining the person's race as being Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaska Native, or Asian or Pacific Islander; 2) the reason for the motor vehicle stop; 3) the make and year of the motor vehicle; 4) the date, time, and location of the motor vehicle stop; 5) whether or not a law enforcement officer conducted a search of the motor vehicle, the operator, or any passenger and, if so, whether the search was with consent or by other means; 6) the name, address, gender, and race of any person searched; and 7) the name and badge number of the officer making the motor vehicle stop.
The information that is collected under the bill concerning motor vehicle stops is not subject to inspection or copying as a public record. The information, however, must be forwarded to DOJ, which must then compile and analyze it, along with any other relevant information, to determine, both for the state as a whole and for each law enforcement agency, whether the number of stops and searches involving motor vehicles operated or occupied by members of a racial minority are disproportionate compared to the number of stops and searches involving motor vehicles operated or occupied solely by persons who are not members of a racial minority.
The determination of whether the number of stops and searches involving racial minorities is disproportionate must be based on an estimate of the population and characteristics of all persons traveling on state highways, on an estimate of the populations and characteristics of persons traveling on state highways who are violating a law or ordinance, or on some other relevant population estimate.
If DOJ finds that the number of stops and searches involving racial minorities is disproportionate compared to the number of stops and searches involving nonminorities, DOJ must then determine whether that disproportion is the result of racial profiling, racial stereotyping, or other race-based discrimination or selective enforcement. Under the bill, DOJ must prepare an annual report that summarizes the information submitted to it by law enforcement agencies and that describes the methods and conclusions of its analysis of the information.
law enforcement training and standards Under current law, no person may be appointed as a law enforcement officer unless the person has been certified by the Law Enforcement Standards Board (LESB) after completing a training program approved by LESB. Currently, LESB must establish minimum educational and training standards for law enforcement officers and minimum curriculum requirements for law enforcement officer training programs. The bill requires LESB to ensure that its law enforcement training program include instruction designed to prevent the use of race, racial profiling, racial stereotyping, or other race-based discrimination or selection as a basis for detaining, searching, or arresting a person or for otherwise treating a person differently from persons of other races.
Under current law, state and local law enforcement agencies must have a written policy or standard regulating the use of force by law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties. State and local law enforcement agencies must also establish a specific procedure for processing and resolving complaints by any person regarding the conduct of a law enforcement officer employed by the agency.
The bill requires state and local law enforcement agencies also to adopt, by January 1, 2017, a written policy that prohibits a law enforcement officer employed by the agency from stopping, detaining, searching, or arresting a person based solely on any of the following: 1) the person's race; 2) a racial stereotype; 3) a profile of persons who commit or are suspected of committing crimes, or a category of crimes, if the profile is based solely or primarily on the race of those persons; or 4) any other method of racially discriminatory or racially selective enforcement.
Who's behind it
Leon Young, a Democrat, is its .
1 more lawmaker .
See all 2 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What happened
-
Apr 13, 2016
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 18, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.
-
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor