Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: town zoning ordinances affecting shorelands.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for all
shorelands in its unincorporated area and the ordinance must meet shoreland
zoning standards established by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) by
rule. Current law defines a shoreland to be an area within a specified distance from
the edge of a navigable water.
Current law also provides that if an existing town ordinance relating to
shorelands is more restrictive than a later enacted county shoreland zoning
ordinance, the town ordinance remains in effect to the extent of the greater
restrictions, but not otherwise.
In
Hegwood v. Town of Eagle Zoning Board of Appeals
, 2013 WI App 118, N.W.
2d 111, the Wisconsin Appellate Court held that a town has no authority to regulate
shorelands unless the town enacted an ordinance before a county shoreland zoning
ordinance was enacted regulating the same shorelands. The court held that in that
case, the town ordinance continues in effect only to the extent that it is more
restrictive than the later enacted county shoreland zoning ordinance.
This bill provides that a town, with certain exceptions, may enact a zoning
ordinance, consistent with its existing zoning authority, that applies in shorelands.
The bill also specifies that a town zoning ordinance may not impose restrictions or
requirements in shorelands with respect to matters regulated by a county shoreland
ordinance affecting the same shorelands. The bill does not change current law which
provides that a town ordinance that is in effect before a county shoreland zoning
ordinance takes effect and that is more restrictive than the county shoreland zoning
ordinance, continues to apply to the extent of the greater restrictions.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Cowles (R) , Gudex (R) , Lasee (R) , Lassa (D) , Olsen (R) , Ringhand (D) , Roth (R) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)
23 cosponsors
Allen (R) , Bernier (R) , Billings (D) , Born (R) , Danou (D) , Doyle (D) , E. Brooks (R) , Jacque (R) , Jarchow (R) , Kahl (D) , Kolste (D) , Krug (R) , Kulp (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Macco (R) , Murphy (R) , Murtha (R) , Novak (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tittl (R)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jun 5, 2015 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 8, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Gudex, Ringhand, Olsen, Lassa, Cowles, Vinehout, Lasee, Roth and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Jacque, Spreitzer, Born, Jarchow, Kahl, E. Brooks, Tittl, Loudenbeck, Ripp, Kolste, Billings, Murphy, Kulp, Rohrkaste, Doyle, Allen, Bernier, Danou, Thiesfeldt, Novak, Krug, Murtha and Macco
- Apr 8, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections and Local Government
- Apr 23, 2015 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jun 3, 2015 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jun 5, 2015 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jun 5, 2015 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1