Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

SB 145

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: authorizing the circuit court to order a person who engages in discrimination in employment, unfair honesty testing, or unfair genetic testing to pay compensatory and punitive damages. (FE)

Circuit court Consumer protection Damage _personal injury_ Discrimination in employment Genetics and genetic testing Lie detector Workforce development, department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current fair employment law, a person alleging discrimination in

employment or unfair honesty or genetic testing may file a complaint with the

Department of Workforce Development (DWD) seeking action that will effectuate

the purpose of the fair employment law, including reinstating the employee,

providing back pay, and paying costs and attorney fees. The fair employment law,

however, does not authorize DWD to award compensatory or punitive damages to a

complainant.

This bill permits DWD or a person who is alleged or was found to have been

discriminated against or subjected to unfair honesty or genetic testing to bring an

action in circuit court to recover compensatory and punitive damages caused by the

act of discrimination or unfair honesty or genetic testing. Those damages are in

addition to any back pay or other amounts awarded in any administrative

proceeding. The bill, however, does not permit an action for damages to be brought

against any local governmental unit or against any employer employing fewer than

15 individuals.

Under the bill, if the circuit court finds that a defendant has committed an act

of discrimination or unfair honesty or genetic testing, the circuit court must order the

defendant to pay to the person discriminated against compensatory and punitive

damages in an amount that the circuit court finds appropriate, subject to the

following limitations:

1. If the defendant employs 100 or fewer employees, $50,000.

2. If the defendant employs more than 100 but fewer than 201 employees,

$100,000.

3. If the defendant employs more than 200 but fewer than 501 employees,

$200,000.

4. If the defendant employs more than 500 employees, $300,000.

The bill requires DWD to annually revise these amounts based upon the change

in the consumer price index in the previous year, if any positive change has occurred.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bewley (D) , C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Harris Dodd (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Lassa (D) , Miller (D) , Ringhand (D) , Risser (D) , Shilling (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)

36 cosponsors

Barca (D) , Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Danou (D) , Doyle (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kessler (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Meyers (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)

Full history

  1. May 1, 2015 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Hansen, Bewley, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Harris Dodd, C. Larson, Lassa, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, Shilling, L. Taylor, Vinehout and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Sinicki, Barca, Shankland, Zamarripa, Mason, Ohnstad, Barnes, Berceau, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Considine, Danou, Doyle, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Kolste, Meyers, Milroy, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Spreitzer, Stuck, Subeck, C. Taylor, Wachs, Young and Zepnick

  2. May 1, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Jun 3, 2015 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1