Senate Bill 158
Commercial driver licenses. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Dec 18, 2015. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
May 14, 2015
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Nov 6, 2015
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 16, 2015
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2015 Wisconsin Act 123
Latest entry in the official record, Dec 18, 2015: “Published 12-17-2015”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes a number of miscellaneous changes to the statutes related to commercial motor vehicles (CMVs), including the following:
1. Current law prohibits inattentive driving of a motor vehicle, which means that a driver of a motor vehicle may not be so engaged or occupied as to interfere with the safe driving of the vehicle. Current law also specifically prohibits a person who holds a probationary license or instruction permit from driving a motor vehicle while using a cellular or other wireless telephone, except to report an emergency.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill specifically prohibits a person from driving a CMV while using a cellular telephone or other wireless telephone, except to report an emergency.
2. Under current law, a person's operator's license may be cancelled for a variety of reasons. For example, a license may be cancelled if the Department of Transportation (DOT) finds that the application for the license contained a material false statement or if a license has been altered and returned to DOT for cancellation.
This bill specifies that the license of a person who secures, or attempts to secure, a license or endorsement by hiring or permitting another to appear in the person's place to take an examination or otherwise gaining or attempting to gain a passing score in an examination by fraud or otherwise obtain a commercial driver license (CDL) or CDL endorsement by fraud may be cancelled by DOT.
3. Under current law, if DOT has good cause to believe that a licensed operator is not qualified to be licensed, DOT may require the licensee to submit to an examination. After the examination, DOT may take any necessary action, including cancelling the license or permitting the licensee to retain the license subject to restrictions.
Under this bill, if DOT receives credible information that a person holding a CDL committed fraud related to the issuance of the CDL, DOT must require the person to submit to an examination.
4. Under current law, a person licensed to drive a CMV may be disqualified from operating a CMV for several reasons. Among these, a person may be disqualified upon being convicted of certain traffic-related offenses that are classified as "serious traffic violations." A person who is convicted of committing two serious traffic violations within a three-year period is disqualified from operating a CMV for 60 days and a person who is convicted of committing three serious traffic violations within a three-year period is disqualified from operating a CMV for 120 days.
Under this bill, driving a motor vehicle while composing or sending a text message and driving a CMV while using a cellular or other wireless phone are classified as serious traffic violations.
Also under this bill, a person whose CDL is cancelled because the person secured, or attempted to secure, a license or endorsement by hiring or permitting another to appear in the person's place to take an examination or otherwise gained or attempted to gain a passing score in an examination by fraud or otherwise obtain a CDL or CDL endorsement by fraud, is disqualified from operating a CMV for one year.
5. Under current law, a person may be issued a CDL that is subject to certain standard restrictions. Under current law, these standard restrictions are a prohibition from operating a CMV in interstate commerce and a restriction from operating a CMV that is equipped with air brakes.
This bill adds several standard restrictions that may be included on a CDL.
These restrictions indicate that a person is prohibited from one of the following:
operating a CMV equipped with a manual transmission, operating certain large passenger vehicles, operating tractor-trailer CMVs, operating a CMV equipped with full air brakes, or operating any CMV without a medical variance.
This bill also does all of the following:
1. Incorporates certain federal regulations regarding the documentation necessary to receive, and restrictions on, a CDL and requires the labeling of certain CDLs as nondomiciled licenses.
2. Modifies the standards for determining which vehicles are air brake equipped.
3. Changes the period of an instruction permit to operate CMVs or school buses from 6 months to 180 days.
4. Modifies the definition of "tank vehicle" and limits the operation of tank vehicles by persons holding an instruction permit.
5. Requires on-site inspections of third-party driver skills testers biennially rather than annually and permits scoring drivers along with the third-party tester during skills tests as an acceptable manner of evaluating the performance of these testers.
Who's behind it
Jerry Petrowski, a Republican, is its .
4 more lawmakers .
See all 5 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Beth Meyers · Democrat, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2015
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2015
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2015
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Dec 18, 2015
The new law was published.
-
Dec 18, 2015
The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 123.
-
Dec 14, 2015
Sent to the governor.
-
Nov 16, 2015
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Nov 16, 2015
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Nov 9, 2015
The Assembly received it.
-
Nov 6, 2015
The Senate passed it.
-
Nov 6, 2015
The Senate adopted it.
-
Oct 14, 2015
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 14, 2015
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 14, 2015
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Sep 15, 2015
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 28, 2015
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 14, 2015
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs.
-
May 14, 2015
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- May 14, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representatives Spiros, Ripp and A. Ott
- May 14, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs
- May 28, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 15, 2015 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Jul 6, 2015 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Marklein
- Sep 15, 2015 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 13, 2015 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 14, 2015 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 14, 2015 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 14, 2015 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 14, 2015 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 5, 2015 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-6-2015 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 9, 2015 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 12, 2015 · Assembly
Referred to calendar of 11-16-2015 pursuant to Assembly Rule 93
- Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly
Representative Meyers added as a cosponsor
- Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 17, 2015 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Dec 1, 2015 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Dec 14, 2015 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 12-14-2015
- Dec 18, 2015 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 12-16-2015. 2015 Wisconsin Act 123
- Dec 18, 2015 · Senate
Published 12-17-2015
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote