Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Senate Bill 158

Commercial driver licenses. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 18, 2015. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 14, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 6, 2015

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 16, 2015

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 123

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 18, 2015: “Published 12-17-2015”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes a number of miscellaneous changes to the statutes related to commercial motor vehicles (CMVs), including the following:

1. Current law prohibits inattentive driving of a motor vehicle, which means that a driver of a motor vehicle may not be so engaged or occupied as to interfere with the safe driving of the vehicle. Current law also specifically prohibits a person who holds a probationary license or instruction permit from driving a motor vehicle while using a cellular or other wireless telephone, except to report an emergency.

Read the full summary

This bill specifically prohibits a person from driving a CMV while using a cellular telephone or other wireless telephone, except to report an emergency.

2. Under current law, a person's operator's license may be cancelled for a variety of reasons. For example, a license may be cancelled if the Department of Transportation (DOT) finds that the application for the license contained a material false statement or if a license has been altered and returned to DOT for cancellation.

This bill specifies that the license of a person who secures, or attempts to secure, a license or endorsement by hiring or permitting another to appear in the person's place to take an examination or otherwise gaining or attempting to gain a passing score in an examination by fraud or otherwise obtain a commercial driver license (CDL) or CDL endorsement by fraud may be cancelled by DOT.

3. Under current law, if DOT has good cause to believe that a licensed operator is not qualified to be licensed, DOT may require the licensee to submit to an examination. After the examination, DOT may take any necessary action, including cancelling the license or permitting the licensee to retain the license subject to restrictions.

Under this bill, if DOT receives credible information that a person holding a CDL committed fraud related to the issuance of the CDL, DOT must require the person to submit to an examination.

4. Under current law, a person licensed to drive a CMV may be disqualified from operating a CMV for several reasons. Among these, a person may be disqualified upon being convicted of certain traffic-related offenses that are classified as "serious traffic violations." A person who is convicted of committing two serious traffic violations within a three-year period is disqualified from operating a CMV for 60 days and a person who is convicted of committing three serious traffic violations within a three-year period is disqualified from operating a CMV for 120 days.

Under this bill, driving a motor vehicle while composing or sending a text message and driving a CMV while using a cellular or other wireless phone are classified as serious traffic violations.

Also under this bill, a person whose CDL is cancelled because the person secured, or attempted to secure, a license or endorsement by hiring or permitting another to appear in the person's place to take an examination or otherwise gained or attempted to gain a passing score in an examination by fraud or otherwise obtain a CDL or CDL endorsement by fraud, is disqualified from operating a CMV for one year.

5. Under current law, a person may be issued a CDL that is subject to certain standard restrictions. Under current law, these standard restrictions are a prohibition from operating a CMV in interstate commerce and a restriction from operating a CMV that is equipped with air brakes.

This bill adds several standard restrictions that may be included on a CDL.

These restrictions indicate that a person is prohibited from one of the following:

operating a CMV equipped with a manual transmission, operating certain large passenger vehicles, operating tractor-trailer CMVs, operating a CMV equipped with full air brakes, or operating any CMV without a medical variance.

This bill also does all of the following:

1. Incorporates certain federal regulations regarding the documentation necessary to receive, and restrictions on, a CDL and requires the labeling of certain CDLs as nondomiciled licenses.

2. Modifies the standards for determining which vehicles are air brake equipped.

3. Changes the period of an instruction permit to operate CMVs or school buses from 6 months to 180 days.

4. Modifies the definition of "tank vehicle" and limits the operation of tank vehicles by persons holding an instruction permit.

5. Requires on-site inspections of third-party driver skills testers biennially rather than annually and permits scoring drivers along with the third-party tester during skills tests as an acceptable manner of evaluating the performance of these testers.

Who's behind it

Jerry Petrowski, a Republican, is its ⁠.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 5 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 18, 2015

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 18, 2015

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 123.

  3. Dec 14, 2015

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 16, 2015

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Nov 16, 2015

    The Assembly passed it too.

  6. Nov 9, 2015

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Nov 6, 2015

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Nov 6, 2015

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Oct 14, 2015

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Oct 14, 2015

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Oct 14, 2015

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Sep 15, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. May 28, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. May 14, 2015

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs.

  15. May 14, 2015

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 14, 2015 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representatives Spiros, Ripp and A. Ott

  2. May 14, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs

  3. May 28, 2015 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 15, 2015 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski

  5. Jul 6, 2015 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Marklein

  6. Sep 15, 2015 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Oct 13, 2015 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Oct 14, 2015 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Oct 14, 2015 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Oct 14, 2015 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 14, 2015 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-6-2015 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  16. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Nov 9, 2015 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Nov 12, 2015 · Assembly

    Referred to calendar of 11-16-2015 pursuant to Assembly Rule 93

  22. Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Representative Meyers added as a cosponsor

  27. Nov 16, 2015 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Nov 17, 2015 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  29. Dec 1, 2015 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Dec 14, 2015 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-14-2015

  31. Dec 18, 2015 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-16-2015. 2015 Wisconsin Act 123

  32. Dec 18, 2015 · Senate

    Published 12-17-2015

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote